Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 07:17:12PM -0500, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Gnome in Fedora simply gets more development effort, has more  
>> documentation based around it and therefore deserves to be the default. 
>> Pretending that KDE has the same level of support does nothing to  
>> benefit KDE.
>
> There is a self-fulfilling prophecy in there.

It's not the project's role to lift non-default software to the same 
level of involvement as the default software. Why /should/ KDE be 
treated equally?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux