On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Matthew Garrett<mjg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 07:17:12PM -0500, Matthew Woehlke wrote: >> Matthew Garrett wrote: >>> Gnome in Fedora simply gets more development effort, has more >>> documentation based around it and therefore deserves to be the default. >>> Pretending that KDE has the same level of support does nothing to >>> benefit KDE. >> >> There is a self-fulfilling prophecy in there. > > It's not the project's role to lift non-default software to the same > level of involvement as the default software. Why /should/ KDE be > treated equally? When I look at a directory listing and see Fedora-11-x86_64-Live.iso Fedora-11-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso it is pretty clear to KDE users which image they want. How about we give the poor Gnome users the same courtesy and indicate which image includes what they are looking for? Why should KDE be treated better? John -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
