Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Bill Nottingham  wrote:
> Kevin Kofler said:
>> > It's not a default if you're providing a choice.
>>
>> I see no reason why we can't provide a choice of 2 desktops.
>
> Because giving people a choice when they can't possibly make a good
> informed decision is horrible UI.
>

I am confused. How does this comply with the "it doesn't really
matter" argument which was the primary reasoning that was presented to
reject this proposal?

> If you've got someone new to Fedora, and they go to the page, asking
> them to choose between Mumble and Frotz (and Moof, and Wobble), with
> no other data (as exists right now on get-fedora, or even on the OpenSUSE
> page), there's no way they can make a useful decision, and it's only
> going to make their experience worse.
>

Could you elaborate on this? What will be worse? Will they just not
download Fedora because there are too many choices? Will we lose
potential users?

Best,
Orcan

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux