Re: doubt regarding package name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Having subpackages that do not have the SRPM name as a prefix is terrible on tools adn scripts and should be avoided.
>
> Why not lzma-sdk-java   lzma-sdk-sharp  etc.?
>

I think that's a problem of those tools/scripts and not of this package.

lzma-sdk-java is good but on the other hand, lzma's java SDK is called
"SevenZip". Why not just use "SevenZip"? I don't think it mixes up
with 7-zip, as the summaries are very different. Package summaries
show up pretty much everywhere including "yum search foo".

I'd like to remind everyone that unlike perl, tcl/tk, ... ; the word
"java" doesn't need to take part in java package names.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux