I love how "the other side" keeps ignoring that we have a
chicken-and-egg situation here.
We have two problems:
1. Fedora has trouble attracting KDE developers.
2. Fedora presents Gnome as "better".
Okay, it's been argued into the ground that #2 is justified by #1. The
problem is, #1 is *also* justified by #2. Neither of the justifications
is going to disappear until the opposing problem disappears. Refusing to
do anything is just going to maintain the status-quo ("vicious cycle",
and all that).
In order to break the cycle, it is necessary to have the courage to
simply attack one of the problems, trusting that treating the symptom
will, in such case, allow the justifications ('underlying causes", if
you will) to sort themselves out.
Now... one of these can be addressed much more easily than the other. Do
I really need to point out which one?
Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 04:22:34AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Why? The natural choice for KDE users right now is either OpenSuse or
Kubuntu. Why would these users choose Fedora instead?
...because Kubuntu lags quite behind Fedora in recentness (and as a
result, feature) and OpenSuse is Novell-affiliated.
(And let's please leave it at "some people will avoid *suse because of
Novell", without getting into whether or not they /should/.)
The alternative is to provide enough resources to be able to hire
several full time KDE developers.
(If you happen to find such resources, please let me know; I'd be
interested ;-).)
--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
...yzarc gniog ylwols era uoY
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
