Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 06/28/2009 10:32 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> >> Rahul, I question the point of ... making laundry lists of pros, cons, >> bugs >> of desktop X vs Y... I'm sure folks can come up with a similar list of >> gnome (or other) related negative items, or kde-only features too but I >> question it's constructiveness. > > The constructiveness if for KDE SIG and individuals to accept... I am not going there... la la la. >> 2. A bigger question to me is what does it mean to be the "default" >> desktop. All this "it's the default because..." comments make me wonder >> if >> folks are just grasping for reasons to justify the status quo. Where or >> how >> is this documented anywhere? If it isn't, shouldn't it be? > > Why single out desktop environments? Is the justifications for all of > our defaults documented anywhere? Shouldn't it be? Indeed, amen brother, but you've gotta start somewhere. -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
