Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From: Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:42:41 +0530
In-reply-to: <4A433048.9070309@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Red Hat
Reply-to: sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b5pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.4.b3pre.hg.6a6386c16e98.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b3pre

On 06/25/2009 01:37 PM, Simon Andrews wrote:

> 
> 1) All of our servers have to access the internet via a proxy.  At least
> within the Anaconda UI there doesn't appear to be any support for
> configuring proxies so I'm forced into kickstart / shells / extra boot
> options to upgrade?

Do you have a RFE filed on this?

Rahul

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: Simon Andrews

References:
- Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: Bharath
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: drago01
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: Michael Schwendt
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: Nathanael D. Noblet
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: Dave Jones
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: Jesse Keating
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: Kevin Kofler
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: Simon Andrews
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: Kevin Kofler
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: Simon Andrews

Prev by Date: Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
Next by Date: Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
Previous by thread: Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
Next by thread: Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]