Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:

- A topic was brought up to FESCo. It was concerning an unease of an
important fraction of our members.

and I disagree with that fraction.


- You may not find it an important issue personally. But that doesn't
change the fact that there is an issue.

Actually, I disagree that it is an issue that was cause for [much] concern.


- As a steering committee member, you must prepare for the meetings
and try to come up with different solutions if you don't agree with a
proposal, since ignoring will only help to the growth rate of a
disease.


I had read the proposal. I didn't think it was necessary. I made an argument against it. Apparently, a quorum of fesco members agreed on that point.



This is the type of quality I expect from you and other FESCo members.
Do I expect too much?

Fedora contributors elected representatives. We evaluated what we were presented. We rejected the proposal. How is that NOT doing what is expected of us?

-sv

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux