On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Rex Dieter<rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Rahul, I question the point of ... making laundry lists of pros, cons, bugs > of desktop X vs Y... I'm sure folks can come up with a similar list of > gnome (or other) related negative items, or kde-only features too but I > question it's constructiveness. > > My only comments here: > > 1. The desktop spin *is* gnome for cryin out loud. Seriously, common sense > is just screaming in my head to call a spade a spade. > > 2. A bigger question to me is what does it mean to be the "default" > desktop. All this "it's the default because..." comments make me wonder if > folks are just grasping for reasons to justify the status quo. Where or how > is this documented anywhere? If it isn't, shouldn't it be? Whatever desktop RH employees are paid to work on to satisfy their biggest RHEL customers needs. Or what they *think* their biggest RHEL customers want. I think the question you need to ask is why they must force this onto the Fedora *community* OS when the community is clearly objecting to it. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
