Seth Vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: >>> However, I don't think there's anything to worry about here. The only >>> reason that we ship mono *at all* is that we're covered by some OIN >>> patents on it. I'm not sure which OIN patents those are, but >>> essentially if Microsoft wants to pick that fight, >> >> ... it's not OIN patents, it's that mono is in the OIN list of protected >> packages. Just clarifying. > > Does OIN cover the specific version we're carrying? I thought OIN was > version specific. It covers a specific version of a package, and the functionality provided by that version in any successive release of that package. So, even though libX11 was split out of the xorg-x11 package after the OIN package list was approved, it's still covered. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
