On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Orcan Ogetbil<oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > - As a steering committee member, you must prepare for the meetings > and try to come up with different solutions if you don't agree with a > proposal, since ignoring will only help to the growth rate of a > disease. As I said during the meeting, I believe that this particular item is out of scope for FESCo. From the FESCo mission: "FESCo handles the process of accepting new features, the acceptance of new packaging sponsors, Special Interest Groups (SIGs) and SIG Oversight, the packaging process, handling and enforcement of maintainer issues and other technical matters related to the distribution and its construction." I really don't think that this falls into such a category. However, I'm willing to entertain discussion on it, because I think that the topic is important. As has been said elsewhere in this thread, there is no "separate but equal" doctrine in play here. GNOME gets more support than KDE in Fedora. Adam Miller brought up a great point on IRC - if I were a GNOME user using OpenSUSE, I would have no expectation that I'd be getting the same level of support and having the same experience as a KDE user on that distro. It is the way it is. Don't get me wrong, none of us is AGAINST KDE in any form or fashion, it's simply a fact of the condition that we're in at present. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
