Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Jun 26, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:

Seth Vidal wrote:


On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Roberto Ragusa wrote:

Seth Vidal wrote:

and if you can make this happen every time with 3.2.23 if you could
please run:

time yum -d 3 list updates | grep 'time:'

You were not talking to me, but I tried and
look at this: (added -C to avoid net access)

# time yum -C -d 3 list updates --disablerepo=atrpms\* | grep 'time:'
Config time: 0.271
repo time: 0.001
pkgsack time: 86.684

and you're POSITIVE nothing is being downloaded here? Nothing at all?

Run it again, please and capture all the output and post it to a pastebin.


I have a hint and it points to the "same rpms in more than one repo"
hypothesis.

yum -d 5 lists a lot of

excluding for cost: firefox-3.0.11-1.fc10.i386 from updates
excluding for cost: gnome-session-2.24.3-1.fc10.i386 from updates
[...]

I see something related to cost handling fixes in the yum Changelog.

My guess is that elements are removed from an array one at a time
and everything after that is moved back one position.
Or some inefficiency of that kind.

You may be able to reproduce it by configuring two updates repos.

The performance change occurred between 3.2.21-2 and 3.2.22-5 based on testing on koji f10 downloads.

joe


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux