Joe Nall wrote: > > On Jun 26, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > >> Seth Vidal wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Roberto Ragusa wrote: >>> >>>> Seth Vidal wrote: >>>>> >>>>> and if you can make this happen every time with 3.2.23 if you could >>>>> please run: >>>>> >>>>> time yum -d 3 list updates | grep 'time:' >>>> >>>> You were not talking to me, but I tried and >>>> look at this: (added -C to avoid net access) >>>> >>>> # time yum -C -d 3 list updates --disablerepo=atrpms\* | grep 'time:' >>>> Config time: 0.271 >>>> repo time: 0.001 >>>> pkgsack time: 86.684 >>> >>> and you're POSITIVE nothing is being downloaded here? Nothing at all? >>> >>> Run it again, please and capture all the output and post it to a >>> pastebin. >>> >> >> I have a hint and it points to the "same rpms in more than one repo" >> hypothesis. >> >> yum -d 5 lists a lot of >> >> excluding for cost: firefox-3.0.11-1.fc10.i386 from updates >> excluding for cost: gnome-session-2.24.3-1.fc10.i386 from updates >> [...] >> >> I see something related to cost handling fixes in the yum Changelog. >> >> My guess is that elements are removed from an array one at a time >> and everything after that is moved back one position. >> Or some inefficiency of that kind. >> >> You may be able to reproduce it by configuring two updates repos. > > The performance change occurred between 3.2.21-2 and 3.2.22-5 based on > testing on koji f10 downloads. from rpm -q -changelog yum: * Tue May 12 2009 Seth Vidal <skvidal at fedoraproject.org> - 3.2.22-5 from ChangeLog in yum tar.gz: 2009-04-13 James Antill <james@xxxxxxx> * yum/yumRepo.py: Fix cost sorting of repos. -- Roberto Ragusa mail at robertoragusa.it -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
