Adam Miller wrote: > Where can I find information about the vote on what agenda items the > KDE SIG wants you to bring to the FESCo table? I apparently missed out > on this. Given when KDE SIG meets and how short-term most FESCo stuff gets tabled, in most cases, the only place feedback can be provided is #fedora-kde. But anyway, holding KDE SIG votes on what I should vote for FESCo probably isn't a very productive use of our time in most cases. ;-) IMHO, you can usually trust me to know what's "the right thing" for our SIG, but if you want to provide feedback, please do check https://www.fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 a few hours before the meeting and bring the interesting item(s) up on #fedora-kde. Of course I won't guarantee that I'll share your personal position, in fact in cases like here where you defend positions like: > The problem with this is that you are now pushing two things blindly > at ignorant masses, so not only do they have no clue what their doing > because its a different operating system from what they are > (generally) used to but there are two "default" interfaces to it. How > does this make sense? I'm pretty unlikely to share those. ;-) But I doubt you'd get the majority of KDE SIG's members to agree with such a position either. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
