On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 09:31:32AM +0200, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Jun 22, 2009, at 9:26, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> On 06/22/2009 12:54 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: >> >>> >>> Not possible while we allow people to keep making updates to the >>> older >>> releases. Those updates quickly become version ( not just release >>> even >>> ) higher than the static copies on the release medium and repos. >> >> Is there any proposed solution to this problem? We can't just continue >> to break upgrade paths and call it the way things are done. >> >> Rahul >> > > If you have any ideas I'd like to hear them. A super epoch has already > been suggested but that just masks the problem and may cause unwanted > downgrades. Any solution either involves severly limiting what kind of > updates can be done or requiring network access during upgrades. How about something in bodhi that checks you aren't introducing this problem, forcing you to push a higher NVR package to $nextrelease first before you can push it to updates? Considering these updates are supposed to be for our 'stable' release, having them be in $nextrelease first seems like a good idea anyway. Dave -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
