Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From: Frank Murphy <frankly3d@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:38:32 +0100
In-reply-to: <FA1A8250-760F-4350-8B4E-FA6B8566F33B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b5pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.4.b3pre.hg.6a6386c16e98.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b3pre ThunderBrowse/3.2.5

On 22/06/09 08:32, Jesse Keating wrote:


Maybe, freeze all updates nearing a GA,


And keep them frozen indefinitely?

--
Jes


Duh!, forgot the coffee.

That would get the early adopters,
then nearing EOL of current eg 9.
Only allow updates for 11.
Same when 10 is EOL.
Just update most recent release

Frank

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: Jesse Keating

References:
- Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: Bharath
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: drago01
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: Michael Schwendt
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: Nathanael D. Noblet
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: Dave Jones
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: Jesse Keating
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: Frank Murphy
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
  - From: Jesse Keating

Prev by Date: Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
Next by Date: Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
Previous by thread: Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
Next by thread: Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]