Jesse Keating wrote: > Yes, if I didn't like the patch, or how it was done, I didn't accept it. > Just like any other upstream. Did I use your exact code when I did it > myself two weeks later? Probably not. Speaking of rel-eng patches, what happened to my patch to the EVR checker to properly support testing repos (e.g. updates-testing, but the code is general enough to also work for things like RPM Fusion's or EPEL's testing repos)? http://repo.calcforge.org/f10/check-upgrade-paths.py.diff > And they're well within their right, as an upstream project, to reject > such things. Just because the patch works great on one branch doesn't > mean it'll work the same on another. They are the ones to decide that. > This is how opensource development works. But the thing is, in the cases kanarip is talking about, Fedora Unity tried it and it did work… :-) Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
