Fedora Development Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: EXTERNAL: firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs
  • From: Wells, Roger K.
• Re: firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs
  • From: Martin Stransky
• Re: clang segmentation fault on armv7hf
  • From: Richard Shaw
• firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: clang segmentation fault on armv7hf
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Fedora 30 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Mohan Boddu
• Re: clang segmentation fault on armv7hf
  • From: John Reiser
• Fedora Rawhide-20190402.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190402.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Orphaning packages
  • From: Kiara Navarro
• Re: Modularity UX Questions
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: Modularity UX Questions
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Modularity UX Questions
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Modularity UX Questions
  • From: Lukas Ruzicka
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Kamil Paral
• Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Modularity UX Questions
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Modularity UX Questions
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Sphinx and xindy
  • From: Jerry James
• [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
  • From: nils
• Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Orphaned packages to be retired
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190401.0
  • From: noreply
• Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Fedora 30-20190401.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal:
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190401.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Modularity UX Questions
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: clang segmentation fault on armv7hf
  • From: Tom Stellard
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190401.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora Rawhide-20190401.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2019-04-01)
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Jonathan Wakely
• Re: clang segmentation fault on armv7hf
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Fedora 30 Beta Go/No-Go meeting
  • From: Mamoru TASAKA
• [HEADS UP][SUDO] changing default sudoers file
  • From: Marek Tamaskovic
• Re: Stewardship SIG: Initial report and plans for the future
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: [stewardship-sig] Stewardship SIG: Initial report and plans for the future
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: [stewardship-sig] Stewardship SIG: Initial report and plans for the future
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: [stewardship-sig] Stewardship SIG: Initial report and plans for the future
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• [Review needed] oidn package
  • From: Luya Tshimbalanga
• Re: clang segmentation fault on armv7hf
  • From: John Reiser
• Re: dnf crashes make fedpkg / mock unusable
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• PSA: workaround for segfault when running dnf update in F30
  • From: Jonathan Dieter
• Re: provider bad repo (network) or bug development ?
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: dnf crashes make fedpkg / mock unusable
  • From: James Cassell
• Re: VirtualBox 6 and Vagrant in Fedora 29
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: dnf crashes make fedpkg / mock unusable
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• clang segmentation fault on armv7hf
  • From: Richard Shaw
• dnf crashes make fedpkg / mock unusable
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190331.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: provider bad repo (network) or bug development ?
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Fedora Rawhide-20190331.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• provider bad repo (network) or bug development ?
  • From: Cătălin George Feștilă
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190330.n.3 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Fedora 30-20190330.n.3 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• VirtualBox 6 and Vagrant in Fedora 29
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Branched 20190330.n.3 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: rawhide
• [Test-Announce] 2019-04-01 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 30 Blocker Review Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• [Test-Announce] 2019-04-01 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: latest rubygem-puppet-lint for F29 is from F23???
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: sway SIG
  • From: Till Hofmann
• Re: [stewardship-sig] Stewardship SIG: Initial report and plans for the future
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Need assistance to build luxcorerender due to boost
  • From: Luya Tshimbalanga
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Christopher
• Stewardship SIG: Initial report and plans for the future
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Policy regarding redundant dependencies
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: latest rubygem-puppet-lint for F29 is from F23???
  • From: John Florian
• Re: latest rubygem-puppet-lint for F29 is from F23???
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• latest rubygem-puppet-lint for F29 is from F23???
  • From: John Florian
• Re: RPM strip scripts and executables as shared objects
  • From: Robert Marcano
• Re: RPM strip scripts and executables as shared objects
  • From: Josh Stone
• Fedora 30-20190329.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: RPM strip scripts and executables as shared objects
  • From: Robert Marcano
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190329.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: RPM strip scripts and executables as shared objects
  • From: Tom Hughes
• RPM strip scripts and executables as shared objects
  • From: Robert Marcano
• Introduction for GSoC: Koundinya
  • From: Venkata Rama Koundinya Lanka
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: [stewardship-sig] Re: Announcing the Stewardship SIG: Maintenance for High-Priority orphans
  • From: Jakub Jelen
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Announcing the Stewardship SIG: Maintenance for High-Priority orphans
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Announcing the Stewardship SIG: Maintenance for High-Priority orphans
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Student Introduction
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Przemek Klosowski
• Re: Need assistance to build luxcorerender due to boost
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Christopher
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Anitya not working again?
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Fedora Packaging Location & Symlinks Question
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Fedora GPG signing/verifying question
  • From: Michael Zhang
• Re: F31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Include several modules in the EFI build of Grub2 for security use-cases
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Fedora Packaging Location & Symlinks Question
  • From: Michael Zhang
• Re: Fedora GPG signing/verifying question
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Fedora GPG signing/verifying question
  • From: Michael Zhang
• Re: Proposal: Stewardship Group / SIG for taking care of otherwise "module-only" packages
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• mythes-eo package
  • From: Carmen Bianca Bakker
• Need assistance to build luxcorerender due to boost
  • From: Luya Tshimbalanga
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: strange failures with gcc-9.0.1-0.11.fc31.x86_64
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Re: strange failures with gcc-9.0.1-0.11.fc31.x86_64
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: strange failures with gcc-9.0.1-0.11.fc31.x86_64
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH vs rpath and libtool
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: M A Young
• Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH vs rpath and libtool
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Proposal: Stewardship Group / SIG for taking care of otherwise "module-only" packages
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Proposal: Stewardship Group / SIG for taking care of otherwise "module-only" packages
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• LD_LIBRARY_PATH vs rpath and libtool
  • From: Ingvar Hagelund
• Re: Proposal: Stewardship Group / SIG for taking care of otherwise "module-only" packages
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Proposal: Stewardship Group / SIG for taking care of otherwise "module-only" packages
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: pkgconfig usage
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: strange failures with gcc-9.0.1-0.11.fc31.x86_64
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: [Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 30 Beta Go/No-Go meeting
  • From: Silvia Sánchez
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Orphaning python-Lektor
  • From: Sasa Savic
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: pkgconfig usage
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• pkgconfig usage
  • From: Luya Tshimbalanga
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2019-03-28 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Jonathan Wakely
• Re: sway SIG
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Martin Gansser
• Re: Strange C++ error with GCC 9.0.1
  • From: Peter Lemenkov
• Re: sway SIG
  • From: qrsBRWN
• Re: Proposal: Stewardship Group / SIG for taking care of otherwise "module-only" packages
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated
  • From: David Dykstra
• Re: Proposal: Stewardship Group / SIG for taking care of otherwise "module-only" packages
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: sway SIG
  • From: Jeff Peeler
• Re: Is SELinux enforcing on the koji builders?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: ACTION NEEDED: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 1 week)
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: ACTION NEEDED: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 1 week)
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: ACTION NEEDED: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 1 week)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: ACTION NEEDED: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 1 week)
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: Strange C++ error with GCC 9.0.1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely
• Re: Strange C++ error with GCC 9.0.1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely
• Re: Strange C++ error with GCC 9.0.1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely
• Re: Policy regarding redundant dependencies
  • From: Georg Sauthoff
• Re: Strange C++ error with GCC 9.0.1
  • From: J. Scheurich
• Fedora Rawhide-20190327.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190327.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Orphaning python-Lektor
  • From: Charalampos Stratakis
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
• rubygem-curb license change from Ruby to MIT
  • From: Pavel Valena
• Re: Strange C++ error with GCC 9.0.1
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: Strange C++ error with GCC 9.0.1
  • From: Peter Lemenkov
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Chris Adams
• Re: Multiple Review Requests for one source package?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Policy regarding redundant dependencies
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Is SELinux enforcing on the koji builders?
  • From: Lubomír Sedlář
• Re: Strange C++ error with GCC 9.0.1
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• [Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 30 Beta Go/No-Go meeting
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Strange C++ error with GCC 9.0.1
  • From: Peter Lemenkov
• Student Introduction
  • From: Hemant Kumar Singh
• Re: Is SELinux enforcing on the koji builders?
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Martin Gansser
• strange failures with gcc-9.0.1-0.11.fc31.x86_64
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Non-responsive maintainer - Micah Roth
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Martin Gansser
• Re: Older Fedora AMIs to be deleted
  • From: Sayan Chowdhury
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Martin Gansser
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Jakub Jelen
• fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Martin Gansser
• Re: Announcing the Stewardship SIG: Maintenance for High-Priority orphans
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Kamil Paral
• Re: Announcing the Stewardship SIG: Maintenance for High-Priority orphans
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated
  • From: Jakub Cajka
• Re: Announcing the Stewardship SIG: Maintenance for High-Priority orphans
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Is SELinux enforcing on the koji builders?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Older Fedora AMIs to be deleted
  • From: Sayan Chowdhury
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: John M. Harris, Jr.
• Re: Is SELinux enforcing on the koji builders?
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Wolfgang Ulbrich
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Adam Jackson
• Fedora 30-20190326.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Packaging Question - Open Liberty
  • From: Michael Zhang
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190326.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Fedora 30 Beta 1.8 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• soname bump on libprojectM without announcement in rawhide
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• soname bump on libprojectM with announcement in rawhide
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Policy regarding redundant dependencies
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Policy regarding redundant dependencies
  • From: Georg Sauthoff
• Add internationalization support to "Command completed." string.
  • From: Peter Pan
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Candidate Beta-1.8 Available Now!
  • From: rawhide
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: mcatanzaro
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: New Repo failed with "The Pagure project already exists"
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• New Repo failed with "The Pagure project already exists"
  • From: Christophe de Dinechin
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• ACTION NEEDED: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 1 week)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Jonathan Wakely
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
  • From: nils
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• F31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Include several modules in the EFI build of Grub2 for security use-cases
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Bugzilla (?) component for Fedora cloud images
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Bugzilla (?) component for Fedora cloud images
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2019-03-25)
  • From: Justin Forbes
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Steven Bonneville
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: R P Herrold
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: New member on the block; Introducing Apprise
  • From: Chris
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Adam Williamson
• HEADS UP: PyYAML 5.1 in all Fedoras
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: New member on the block; Introducing Apprise
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Review swaps (Golang packages)
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: [modularity] Bringing order to the confusing module stream and profile names
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• gegl04 update in rawhide and f30
  • From: Josef Ridky
• Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2019-03-25)
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Jan Pokorný
• Re: Is SELinux enforcing on the koji builders?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Bugzilla (?) component for Fedora cloud images
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Is SELinux enforcing on the koji builders?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Is SELinux enforcing on the koji builders?
  • From: John M. Harris, Jr.
• Re: Is SELinux enforcing on the koji builders?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Is SELinux enforcing on the koji builders?
  • From: Jerry James
• Fedora 30-20190324.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190324.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190324.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora Rawhide-20190324.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30
  • From: Glenn Johnson
• Fedora 30 Beta 1.7 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Candidate Beta-1.7 Available Now!
  • From: rawhide
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190323.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora Rawhide-20190323.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 30-20190323.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190323.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: Packaging HTML/Javascript "application" for visualizing some json data
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Re: Packaging HTML/Javascript "application" for visualizing some json data
  • From: John Reiser
• Packaging HTML/Javascript "application" for visualizing some json data
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Re: Multiple Review Requests for one source package?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: two Ceph updates for f28, f29, stuck in pending testing for six days
  • From: Ken Dreyer
• Re: New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• [Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2019-03-25 Fedora QA Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• [Test-Announce] 2019-03-25 @ ** 16:00 ** UTC - Fedora 30 Blocker Review Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: two Ceph updates for f28, f29, stuck in pending testing for six days
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Owen Taylor
• Fedora 30-20190322.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190322.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: Packit is released: Packaging as a Service
  • From: Luke Hinds
• F31 System-Wide Change proposal: F31 Mass Python 2 Package Removal
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190322.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora Rawhide-20190322.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Orhpaning rubygem-jnunemaker-matchy
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Beta is No-Go, today's Go/No-Go meeting is canceled
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Kamil Dudka
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: Multiple Review Requests for one source package?
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Kamil Dudka
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: two Ceph updates for f28, f29, stuck in pending testing for six days
  • From: Kaleb Keithley
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• soname update - libqalculate
  • From: Mukundan Ragavan
• Fedora testing-20190321.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 30-20190321.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Packaging Question - Open Liberty
  • From: Michael Zhang
• Re: Packaging Question - Open Liberty
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190321.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: Packaging Question - Open Liberty
  • From: Adam Williamson
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Beta Go/No-Go decision is delayed 1 day
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Packaging Question - Open Liberty
  • From: Michael Zhang
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190321.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: sway SIG
  • From: Fabio Alessandro Locati
• Fedora Rawhide-20190321.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Packit is released: Packaging as a Service
  • From: Dusty Mabe
• Packit is released: Packaging as a Service
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Stephan Bergmann
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Candidate Beta-1.4 Available Now!
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Can we please stop enforcing Signed-off-by commits?
  • From: Peter Hutterer
• Fedora 30 Beta 1.4 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Candidate Beta-1.4 Available Now!
  • From: rawhide
• Re: Looking for an advice on file location in Fedora
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Can we please stop enforcing Signed-off-by commits?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Fedora Rawhide-20190320.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190320.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• [Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 30 Beta Go/No-Go meeting
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Multiple Review Requests for one source package?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Looking for an advice on file location in Fedora
  • From: Michal Ruprich
• Re: Looking for an advice on file location in Fedora
  • From: Michal Ruprich
• Re: Looking for an advice on file location in Fedora
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Looking for an advice on file location in Fedora
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Announcing the Stewardship SIG: Maintenance for High-Priority orphans
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Announcing the Stewardship SIG: Maintenance for High-Priority orphans
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Announcing the Stewardship SIG: Maintenance for High-Priority orphans
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Announcing the Stewardship SIG: Maintenance for High-Priority orphans
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Looking for an advice on file location in Fedora
  • From: Michal Ruprich
• Announcing the Stewardship SIG: Maintenance for High-Priority orphans
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
• Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190318.0
  • From: noreply
• Re: Self Introduction: Hirotaka Wakabayashi
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Deciding on Fedora Go (Golang) packaging future
  • From: Jakub Cajka
• Re: RHEL8 and Mageia7 available in Copr
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Very late Fedora 30 change considered: Mono 5
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Help us test FedoraReview on Python 3
  • From: José Abílio Matos
• Orphaning rubygem-map
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: [Fwd: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 2 weeks)]
  • From: Stelian Iancu
• Re: Self Introduction: Hirotaka Wakabayashi
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: RHEL8 and Mageia7 available in Copr
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: RHEL8 and Mageia7 available in Copr
  • From: Gerd Hoffmann
• Re: [Fwd: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 2 weeks)]
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
  • From: nils
• Re: [Fwd: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 2 weeks)]
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: [Fwd: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 2 weeks)]
  • From: Gerald Henriksen
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: sway SIG
  • From: Jan Pokorný
• Re: Copr is going to remove build data from end-of-life chroots
  • From: Jakub Kadlcik
• Re: Deciding on Fedora Go (Golang) packaging future
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: hdf5, netcdf, and vtk updates coming to Rawhide today
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: sway SIG
  • From: Jim Perrin
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190318.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: sway SIG
  • From: Timothée Floure
• Fedora Rawhide-20190318.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Reviewing a package with an rpmfusion dependency
  • From: Ben Rosser
• Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2019-03-18)
  • From: Justin Forbes
• Re: Reviewing a package with an rpmfusion dependency
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Help us test FedoraReview on Python 3
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• [Fwd: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 2 weeks)]
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: sway SIG
  • From: Zachary Snyder
• Re: sway SIG
  • From: Jan Staněk
• Re: hdf5, netcdf, and vtk updates coming to Rawhide today
  • From: Richard Shaw
• sway SIG
  • From: Till Hofmann
• Re: /dev/net/tun no longer exists in F31 rawhide ?
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: /dev/net/tun no longer exists in F31 rawhide ?
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: /dev/net/tun no longer exists in F31 rawhide ?
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Re: /dev/net/tun no longer exists in F31 rawhide ?
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: /dev/net/tun no longer exists in F31 rawhide ?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: [HEADS UP] Eclipse dropping 32-bit arches
  • From: Mat Booth
• /dev/net/tun no longer exists in F31 rawhide ?
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Removing "hawkey.Repo" class from pythonX-hawkey
  • From: Jaroslav Rohel
• libargon2 soname change
  • From: Milan Broz
• Orphaning rubygem-kaminari
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 2 weeks)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2019-03-18)
  • From: Justin Forbes
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Self Introduction: Hirotaka Wakabayashi
  • From: Hirotaka Wakabayashi
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Jakub Jelen
• Re: Deciding on Fedora Go (Golang) packaging future
  • From: Jakub Cajka
• Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Sphinx and xindy
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Sphinx and xindy
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: state of fedora-review?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: frozen approved review
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: frozen approved review
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: frozen approved review
  • From: Peter Robinson
• frozen approved review
  • From: Didier Fabert
• Re: rpmlint: new "executable stack" warnings on rawhide
  • From: Björn 'besser82' Esser
• Orphaning nodejs packages
  • From: Piotr Popieluch
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190317.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora Rawhide-20190317.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: rpmlint: new "executable stack" warnings on rawhide
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: rpmlint: new "executable stack" warnings on rawhide
  • From: John Reiser
• rpmlint: new "executable stack" warnings on rawhide
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Deciding on Fedora Go (Golang) packaging future
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Fedora 30-20190316.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• License change of R-gsl: GPLv2+ to GPLv3
  • From: Elliott Sales de Andrade
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190316.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• mxml license change
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190316.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora Rawhide-20190316.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• hdf5, netcdf, and vtk updates coming to Rawhide today
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: [Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2019-03-18 Fedora QA Meeting
  • From: Silvia Sánchez
• Re: Fedora 30 Beta blocker status mail #4
  • From: Leigh Scott
• Re: Fedora 30 Beta blocker status mail #4
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Gerald Henriksen
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Re: Fedora 30 Beta blocker status mail #4
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Fedora 30 Beta Release Readiness meeting
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Fedora 30 Beta blocker status mail #4
  • From: Ben Cotton
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Beta Go/No-Go meeting
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: John Florian
• [Test-Announce] 2019-03-18 @ ** 16:00 ** UTC - Fedora 30 Blocker Review Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• [Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2019-03-18 Fedora QA Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Retiring v8-314
  • From: Samuel Rakitničan
• Re: Retiring v8-314
  • From: Samuel Rakitničan
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Non-responsive maintainer Chris Lalancette (clalance)
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Self-introduction: Christophe de Dinechin
  • From: Christophe de Dinechin
• Fedora 30-20190315.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Michal Domonkos
• Re: I've orphaned spec2scl
  • From: Jan Staněk
• Retiring v8-314
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: John M. Harris, Jr.
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Re: Help us test FedoraReview on Python 3
  • From: José Abílio Matos
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Roberto Ragusa
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Branched 20190315.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: rawhide
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Michal Domonkos
• Re: Packaging .c files in a non-devel package
  • From: Christophe de Dinechin
• Re: Concurrent changelogs - merge or nix?
  • From: Alexander Ploumistos
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Samuel Rakitničan
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Michal Domonkos
• Re: Concurrent changelogs - merge or nix?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Introduction
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Concurrent changelogs - merge or nix?
  • From: Alexander Ploumistos
• Re: Sphinx and xindy
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Reviewing a package with an rpmfusion dependency
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Reviewing a package with an rpmfusion dependency
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Sphinx and xindy
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Sphinx and xindy
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Sphinx and xindy
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
• Fedora Rawhide-20190314.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Packaging .c files in a non-devel package
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• Re: Introduction
  • From: J. Scheurich
• Introduction
  • From: Ruchit Vithani
• Fedora 30-20190314.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: bug sandbox with Fedora 29 - many errors
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• Re: gcc again, only on i686 and f29+ hidden symbol cpu_model referenced by dso
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: No builds of v8-314 for f30 and f31
  • From: Samuel Rakitničan
• Re: Updating Rawhide vs GPG keys
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Help us test FedoraReview on Python 3
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• bug sandbox with Fedora 29 - many errors
  • From: Cătălin George Feștilă
• Re: Open Source Conference Albania - CFP is open
  • From: Silva Arapi
• Re: Tracking translation status of a package built in koji
  • From: Sundeep Anand
• Re: Sphinx and xindy
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Open Source Conference Albania - CFP is open
  • From: Alexander Bokovoy
• Re: Open Source Conference Albania - CFP is open
  • From: Silva Arapi
• Re: [modularity] Bringing order to the confusing module stream and profile names
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: [modularity] Bringing order to the confusing module stream and profile names
  • From: Alexander Bokovoy
• Re: Sphinx and xindy
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Open Source Conference Albania - CFP is open
  • From: Silva Arapi
• Re: Help us test FedoraReview on Python 3
  • From: José Abílio Matos
• Re: [modularity] Bringing order to the confusing module stream and profile names
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: [modularity] Bringing order to the confusing module stream and profile names
  • From: Alexander Bokovoy
• Re: [modularity] Bringing order to the confusing module stream and profile names
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Building modules take forever
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• I've orphaned spec2scl
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Packaging .c files in a non-devel package
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: gcc again, only on i686 and f29+ hidden symbol cpu_model referenced by dso
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: On not bumping the epoch in ceph-14, f30 and f31/rawhide
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: On not bumping the epoch in ceph-14, f30 and f31/rawhide
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: On not bumping the epoch in ceph-14, f30 and f31/rawhide
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Roberto Ragusa
• Building modules take forever
  • From: Igor Gnatenko
• Re: Sphinx and xindy
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: gcc again, only on i686 and f29+ hidden symbol cpu_model referenced by dso
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Packaging .c files in a non-devel package
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: On not bumping the epoch in ceph-14, f30 and f31/rawhide
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Packaging .c files in a non-devel package
  • From: Christophe de Dinechin
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Help us test FedoraReview on Python 3
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Follow-up to fix ispc built
  • From: Luya Tshimbalanga
• Re: On not bumping the epoch in ceph-14, f30 and f31/rawhide
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: [modularity] Bringing order to the confusing module stream and profile names
  • From: Alexander Bokovoy
• Re: gcc again, only on i686 and f29+ hidden symbol cpu_model referenced by dso
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: EPEL: Python34 moving to Python36
  • From: Chris
• Re: Help us test FedoraReview on Python 3
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Orcan Ogetbil
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Allowing Epoch to be reset between releases
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Help us test FedoraReview on Python 3
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Orcan Ogetbil
• Re: [modularity] Bringing order to the confusing module stream and profile names
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: No builds of v8-314 for f30 and f31
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: John M. Harris, Jr.
• No builds of v8-314 for f30 and f31
  • From: Samuel Rakitničan
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Christopher
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: Chromium C++ help needed
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Christopher
• Re: Chromium C++ help needed
  • From: mcatanzaro
• Re: Chromium C++ help needed
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: Chromium C++ help needed
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Sphinx and xindy
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: EPEL: Python34 moving to Python36
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Theodore Papadopoulo
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Ben Rosser
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: mcatanzaro
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Nicolas Chauvet
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Richard Hughes
• EPEL: Python34 moving to Python36
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Chromium C++ help needed
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Chromium C++ help needed
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Michael Cronenworth
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Randy Barlow
• Re: Updating Rawhide vs GPG keys
  • From: Colin Walters
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: Downgrading glibc from Rawhide removed /bin/sh (!)
  • From: Florian Weimer
• [modularity] Bringing order to the confusing module stream and profile names
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Kalev Lember
• Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Neal Gompa
• /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Issue with an update, need advice Re: [Fedora Update] [comment] papirus-icon-theme-20190302-1.fc30
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Updating Rawhide vs GPG keys
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Updating Rawhide vs GPG keys
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: Issue with an update, need advice Re: [Fedora Update] [comment] papirus-icon-theme-20190302-1.fc30
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Updating Rawhide vs GPG keys
  • From: Jan Pokorný
• Re: gcc again only on i686 and f29+ hidden symbol cpu_model referenced by dso
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Jakub Jelen
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing
  • From: Zdenek Dohnal
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Tom Hughes
• gcc again only on i686 and f29+ hidden symbol cpu_model referenced by dso
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Alexander Bokovoy
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G
  • From: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
• Fedora Rawhide-20190312.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Christopher
• Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Randy Barlow
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: Can't push to batched an Fedora 30 update?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Updating Rawhide vs GPG keys
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Updating Rawhide vs GPG keys
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Chromium C++ help needed
  • From: Gary Gatling
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)
  • From: Christopher
• Re: Debian and Fedora distro development
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot