Re: dropping %systemd_requires from most packages (guidelines change and mass package update proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Miro Hrončok wrote:

>> So long as EPEL (and Rawhide, tbh) are under the aegis of Fedora, it
>> would be nice at least /some/ effort was made not to toss over
>> incompatible changes, or a broad need for dist conditionals, across the
>> package ecosystem with such cavilerity.
> 
> It's called branches.

And that's fine, being able to easily share .spec's between branches is 
still nice-to-have.

I still personally use and rely on synchronized .spec's (in most branches) a 
*lot*, and will likely continue to do so at leaste until I fully grok and 
embrace modules.

-- Rex
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux