Re: dropping autogenerated dependency on pkg-config

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:29:06AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 5:04 AM Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On So, 28.04.19 20:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > currently, we autogenerate a dependency on pkg-config for all rpms
> > > that ship a .pc file. "dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/pkg-config"
> > > returns 4632 entries on my laptop.
> >
> > You probably need some base RPM to own the dir /usr/lib64/pkgconfig then,
> > which is currently owned by pkgconf-pkg-config, no?
> >
> 
> Correct. pkgconf-pkg-config owns all the base paths for pkgconfig content.

Or simply co-own the directory from all packages that put files there.
Systemd does this already, and explicitly skips the dependency on pkg-config.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux