> > And why below s390x does not have Fedora-Container-Base-*.tar.xz? > > Those are things that failed in the final RC2 compose of Fedora30. > > Since they were not release blocking, they... didn't block the release. > > ...snip... > > > > I change my question. > > Do you know who is creating this kind of multi arch container images? > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/30/Container/aarch64/images/ > > Those were all made by the Fedora 30 rc2 compose. > > pungi is the tool, and this: > https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/blob/f30/f/fedora-final.conf > was the config used. > > Does that answer the question? Yes, Kevin. Thank you for the info. What I do not understand is below DockerHub has Feodra 30 ppc64le, Fedora 29 armhfp that Fedora Project did not release. https://hub.docker.com/r/ppc64le/fedora/ Fedora 29, 30 https://hub.docker.com/r/arm32v7/fedora/ Fedora 29 (not 30) Anyway, as what I wanted is layer.tar in the image archive, maybe I will take it from DockerHub's image like this. $ docker pull arm32v7/fedora:29 $ docker save arm32v7/fedora:29 -o 29-armhfp.tar $ tar -xf 29-armhfp.tar $ ls -l */layer.tar -rw-r--r-- 1 jaruga jaruga 256970240 Feb 20 14:00 88edf58c1d5b3ee606b724b19ac4b4866b20ba93d15d5b330fc6cc29055b480b/layer.tar Thanks. Solved. -- Jun Aruga / He - His - Him jaruga@xxxxxxxxxx / IRC: jaruga _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
