Re: Package with open and closed dual license

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Oh, sorry, I hadn't thought to try searching for previous threads about VeraCrypt in particular.

And, looking at it again, the dual license here is tricky, because it looks like the old TrueCrypt files are still TrueCrypt-licensed, while the new files are Apache-licensed. I wondered briefly about whether VeraCrypt had evolved enough that it would build if you just omitted the TrueCrypt files (unlikely) -- but worse: Many of the old TrueCrypt files have been modified, so license comments at the top claim *portions* of the file will have the old or the new license depending on who wrote which lines when. Eww :(

...Would it be allowed in RPM Fusion, then?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux