Re: dropping %systemd_requires from most packages (guidelines change and mass package update proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 2:40 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Also, if for some reason I don't grok one absolutely needs to use the
> exact same spec file for Fedora 31+ and EPEL7 (which is based on F19),
> than keeping the dependency as it is now is also an option. One extra
> unneeded dependency is not the end of the world.
>
> Zbyszek

It's useful to have one spec file. Maintaining 2 or 3 spec files means
maintaining and keeping synchronized 2, or 3, synchronized git
branches or shoving in logic to detect different build configurations.
This kind of logic is already in practice for RHEL, EPEL, and Fedora
for many packages, even though it is often applied inconsistently.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux