Roberto Ragusa <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> igorleak hau idatzi zuen (2019 mai. 6, al. 15:34):
On 5/6/19 1:40 PM, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote:
> We found this bug before releasing, but it is not a release blocking bug (the upgrade criteria just cover clean n and n-1 upgrading to n+1 and this bug just happens whith continously upgraded systems since fc21 or lower)
Wait a moment, is n and n-1 defined to "installed from scratch n and n-1?".
Is this a precedent that n-installed is different than n-through-upgrades?
Regards.
--
Roberto Ragusa mail at robertoragusa.it
Technically speaking and for our releasing criteria yep, we block on fresh fc28/fc29 default installation of blocker package sets upgrades to fc30, previously upgraded fc28/fc29 are out of scope.
We do our best to support upgrading from previously upgraded systems, but they're not considered blocker bugs if clean default installations of n or n-1 are not affected
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
