GCC Help

• Thread Index

• What's wrong with this class temlate's typedef?
  • From: Rob <spamrefuse@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: malloc always returns null
  • From: Ted Phares <tphares@xxxxxxxx>
• Linking fortran with C libs
  • From: "Vardhan, Sundara (GE Infra, Energy)" <sundara.vardhan@xxxxxx>
• m68k-elf: Zeroed area in ELF file
  • From: Christian Meusel <christian.meusel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: struct->struct->class in C++ no constructor
  • From: "Wesley Smith" <wesley.hoke@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: struct->struct->class in C++ no constructor
  • From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: struct->struct->class in C++ no constructor
  • From: "Chris Jefferson" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• struct->struct->class in C++ no constructor
  • From: "Wesley Smith" <wesley.hoke@xxxxxxxxx>
• Need Help - const - ROM-Area
  • From: "Michael Daiss" <daiss@xxxxxx>
• powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 c++ build failure
  • From: Steve Edwards <edwardss@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: malloc always returns null
  • From: Duane Ellis <duane-gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: malloc always returns null
  • From: Ted Phares <tphares@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: malloc always returns null
  • From: Duane Ellis <duane-gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: malloc always returns null
  • From: Ted Phares <tphares@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: runtime link path and g++
  • From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• runtime link path and g++
  • From: "Wesley Smith" <wesley.hoke@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: poisoned "malloc"
  • From: "Wesley Smith" <wesley.hoke@xxxxxxxxx>
• re: malloc always returns null
  • From: Duane Ellis <duane-gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: malloc always returns null
  • From: Ted Phares <tphares@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: visibility and -Wl,--version-script
  • From: "Mathieu Lacage" <mathieu.lacage@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ intermediate bytecode
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: malloc always returns null
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ intermediate bytecode
  • From: "Dario Saccavino" <kathoum@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: visibility and -Wl,--version-script
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: visibility and -Wl,--version-script
  • From: "Mathieu Lacage" <mathieu.lacage@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: visibility and -Wl,--version-script
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• visibility and -Wl,--version-script
  • From: "Mathieu Lacage" <mathieu.lacage@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Testing and Verifying GCC Compiler Reproducibility
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• malloc always returns null
  • From: Ted Phares <tphares@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Testing and Verifying GCC Compiler Reproducibility
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Testing and Verifying GCC Compiler Reproducibility
  • From: "Michael Gould" <mgould@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Writing a thread-safe library without pulling in pthreads
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Writing a thread-safe library without pulling in pthreads
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: poisoned "malloc"
  • From: "Stephan Zimmer" <st.zimmer@xxxxxx>
• Re: Writing a thread-safe library without pulling in pthreads
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Writing a thread-safe library without pulling in pthreads
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: poisoned "malloc"
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Performance with debug information
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: debugging segfault before main.
  • From: Karl Hiramoto <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Performance with debug information
  • From: "Marc Messiaen" <marc.messiaen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: debugging segfault before main.
  • From: "Andrew Bell" <andrew.bell.ia@xxxxxxxxx>
• Writing a thread-safe library without pulling in pthreads
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Porting of gcc 4.2.3 to AIX
  • From: "Vardhan, Sundara (GE Infra, Energy)" <sundara.vardhan@xxxxxx>
• FW: Porting of gcc 4.2.3 to AIX
  • From: "Vardhan, Sundara (GE Infra, Energy)" <sundara.vardhan@xxxxxx>
• Re: Porting of gcc 4.2.3 to AIX
  • From: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Porting of gcc 4.2.3 to AIX
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with program :S
  • From: Philipp Thomas <pth@xxxxxxx>
• Porting of gcc 4.2.3 to AIX
  • From: "Vardhan, Sundara (GE Infra, Energy)" <sundara.vardhan@xxxxxx>
• debugging segfault before main.
  • From: Karl Hiramoto <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ intermediate bytecode
  • From: Jim Cobban <jcobban@xxxxxxxx>
• Problem with program :S
  • From: "Luis Molina" <lufemo@xxxxxxxxx>
• How to generate warning when converting from int to unsigned implicitly or vice versa?
  • From: "Peng Yu" <pengyu.ut@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Issues when trying to compile gcc on AIX
  • From: "Vardhan, Sundara (GE Infra, Energy)" <sundara.vardhan@xxxxxx>
• Re: gcc -o Foo Foo.java Doesn't Produce Foo
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc -o Foo Foo.java Doesn't Produce Foo
  • From: Eus <eus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Issues when trying to compile gcc on AIX
  • From: "Vardhan, Sundara (GE Infra, Energy)" <sundara.vardhan@xxxxxx>
• in same interest maybe?
  • From: "Jason mclaughlin" <mcjason@xxxxxxxxx>
• ARC Tangetnt-A4 core 7
  • From: Giuseppe Monteleone <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• poisoned "malloc"
  • From: Stephan Zimmer <st.zimmer@xxxxxx>
• Re: gcc -o Foo Foo.java Doesn't Produce Foo
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.3.0 on AIX
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc -o Foo Foo.java Doesn't Produce Foo
  • From: Eus <eus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.3.0 on AIX
  • From: "Vardhan, Sundara (GE Infra, Energy)" <sundara.vardhan@xxxxxx>
• Re: int64_t == long long
  • From: Philipp Thomas <pth@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Untarring gcc 4.3.0 in AIX
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Untarring gcc 4.3.0 in AIX
  • From: "Vardhan, Sundara (GE Infra, Energy)" <sundara.vardhan@xxxxxx>
• Re: int64_t == long long
  • From: Yang Zhang <yanghatespam@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment of large structures in GCC
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment of large structures in GCC
  • From: Alexey Neyman <stilor@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Installation of gcc 4.3.0 on AIX
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment of large structures in GCC
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcj static link fails
  • From: "J. M. Bogaard" <martijn@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: intializing the variables and compling with optimization
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ intermediate bytecode
  • From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Installation of gcc 4.3.0 on AIX
  • From: "Vardhan, Sundara (GE Infra, Energy)" <sundara.vardhan@xxxxxx>
• RE: Alignment of large structures in GCC
  • From: Alexey Neyman <stilor@xxxxxxx>
• RE: Alignment of large structures in GCC
  • From: "Nicholas Miller" <Nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ intermediate bytecode
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• C++ intermediate bytecode
  • From: Optymizer Sez <optymizer@xxxxxxxxx>
• Alignment of large structures in GCC
  • From: Alexey Neyman <stilor@xxxxxxx>
• Re: confused using swprintf and wstring
  • From: "James Gregory" <james.jrg@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: gmp/mpfr/macosx
  • From: Jay <jayk123@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Fwd: questions about gcc PIC port]
  • From: "Jason Cipriani" <jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: single virtual inheritance
  • From: Martin Krischik <krischik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: confused using swprintf and wstring
  • From: Joel Dice <dicej@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• single virtual inheritance
  • From: "- -" <snzzbk@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems compiling gcc under Max OS X
  • From: Nicholas Miller <nicholas.d.miller@xxxxxxx>
• confused using swprintf and wstring
  • From: "James Gregory" <james.jrg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Including <iostream> affects whether or not program freezes?
  • From: "James Gregory" <james.jrg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems compiling gcc under Max OS X
  • From: Dan Allen <danallen46@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Including <iostream> affects whether or not program freezes?
  • From: "James Gregory" <james.jrg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Including <iostream> affects whether or not program freezes?
  • From: "James Gregory" <james.jrg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems compiling gcc under Max OS X
  • From: "Chris Jefferson" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems compiling gcc under Max OS X
  • From: Nicholas Miller <nicholas.d.miller@xxxxxxx>
• Re: intializing the variables and compling with optimization
  • From: Robert William Fuller <hydrologiccycle@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems compiling gcc under Max OS X
  • From: Dan Allen <danallen46@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: intializing the variables and compling with optimization
  • From: "J M Sharath Bharadwaj bharadwaj" <sharathjm.bharadwaj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems compiling gcc under Max OS X
  • From: "Chris Jefferson" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• problems compiling gcc under Max OS X
  • From: Nicholas Miller <nicholas.d.miller@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Keeping assert's active when not in debug mode?
  • From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
• Keeping assert's active when not in debug mode?
  • From: "Christian Convey" <christian.convey@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to write this insn define?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found
  • From: Herbert Saal <herbertsg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: intializing the variables and compling with optimization
  • From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: intializing the variables and compling with optimization
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• intializing the variables and compling with optimization
  • From: "J M Sharath Bharadwaj bharadwaj" <sharathjm.bharadwaj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Question to movsi3.
  • From: "Yves Kurz" <yves.kurz@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc is not responding
  • From: Rudra Banerjee <bnrj.rudra@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc is not responding
  • From: Rudra Banerjee <bnrj.rudra@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC-4.3.1 source from mirror - no configure file
  • From: "Ellis Robin (Bundaberg)" <Robin.Ellis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found
  • From: Herbert Saal <herbertsg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [Fwd: questions about gcc PIC port]
  • From: Platone Ilia <plato@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• AIX - collect2: ld returned 12 exit status
  • From: "Shlomy Marom" <shlomym@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• PING:Reason behind not implementing some instructions of H8SX targets in H8300 port
  • From: "Deepen Mantri" <Deepen.Mantri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Downloading gcc sources ?
  • From: Sharath Manjunatha <shamanju@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Downloading gcc sources ?
  • From: Sharath Manjunatha <shamanju@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC-4.3.1 source from mirror - no configure file
  • From: "Rupert Wood" <me@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: bitset
  • From: "Rupert Wood" <me@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Downloading gcc sources ?
  • From: "Rupert Wood" <me@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Downloading gcc sources ?
  • From: "James Gregory" <james.jrg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Including <iostream> affects whether or not program freezes?
  • From: "James Gregory" <james.jrg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Downloading gcc sources ?
  • From: Sharath Manjunatha <shamanju@xxxxxxxxx>
• bitset
  • From: Rudra Banerjee <bnrj.rudra@xxxxxxxxx>
• How to write this insn define?
  • From: "Ruan Beihong" <ruanbeihong@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC-4.3.1 source from mirror - no configure file
  • From: "Ellis Robin (Bundaberg)" <Robin.Ellis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC-4.3.1 source from mirror - no configure file
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC-4.3.1 source from mirror - no configure file
  • From: "Ellis Robin (Bundaberg)" <Robin.Ellis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• questions about gcc PIC port
  • From: Platone Ilia <plato@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Gcc 4.3.1 installed , butproblem is with the asseembler
  • From: gcc_help <pganesh@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: bitset in C
  • From: Dan Hipschman <dsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Including <iostream> affects whether or not program freezes?
  • From: Burlen Loring <burlen.loring@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Including <iostream> affects whether or not program freezes?
  • From: "Chris Jefferson" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Including <iostream> affects whether or not program freezes?
  • From: "James Gregory" <james.jrg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: directory separators in compiler generated assembly code
  • From: "Joe Tilton" <jhtilton@xxxxxxxxx>
• Little Endian vs Big Endian
  • From: "Vardhan, Sundara (GE Infra, Energy)" <sundara.vardhan@xxxxxx>
• Passing information from analysis pass to assembly code
  • From: Timothy M Jones <tjones1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Including <iostream> affects whether or not program freezes?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Including <iostream> affects whether or not program freezes?
  • From: "Andrew Bell" <andrew.bell.ia@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: gcc for AIX
  • From: "Eric Fernandez" <efernandez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc for AIX
  • From: "Vardhan, Sundara (GE Infra, Energy)" <sundara.vardhan@xxxxxx>
• Re: Including <iostream> affects whether or not program freezes?
  • From: Lionel B <lionelb.nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
• bitset in C
  • From: Rudra Banerjee <bnrj.rudra@xxxxxxxxx>
• rambling about cross build inefficiencies, unclarities, and pie-in-the-sky
  • From: Jay <jayk123@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Including <iostream> affects whether or not program freezes?
  • From: "James Gregory" <james.jrg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: directory separators in compiler generated assembly code
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcj static link fails
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
• gcj static link fails
  • From: "J. M. Bogaard" <martijn@xxxxxxxxxx>
• directory separators in compiler generated assembly code
  • From: "Joe Tilton" <jhtilton@xxxxxxxxx>
• how to configure for 64bit default on ia64-hp-hpux11*
  • From: Michael Haubenwallner <michael.haubenwallner@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-3.2.3 installation failed on RHEL5 -64 bit machine
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-3.2.3 installation failed on RHEL5 -64 bit machine
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-3.2.3 installation failed on RHEL5 -64 bit machine
  • From: ithelp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Optimization, inline functions
  • From: "Lawrence Crowl" <crowl@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mips64
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mips64
  • From: Erik Peterson <EPeterson@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mips64
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• mips64
  • From: Erik Peterson <epeterson@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unable to install gcc-3.2.3 on RHEL-4 64 bit machine
  • From: ithelp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Correct inline assembly constraint for X86 sar instruction
  • From: Gregor Jasny <jasny@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unable to install gcc-3.2.3 on RHEL-4 64 bit machine
  • From: ithelp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: backtrace from a SIGSEGV handler
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• EB40 eval board unresolved symbol
  • From: Lee Marshall <leeguy92@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• backtrace from a SIGSEGV handler
  • From: "Arne Steinarson" <asteinarson@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unexplained behavior on bool variable
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to have gcc generate assembler code with C source listed?
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to have gcc generate assembler code with C source listed?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Unexplained behavior on bool variable
  • From: Guilherme Müller <gmuller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.3 generates less efficient code than gcc 4.1 or 4.2
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to have gcc generate assembler code with C source listed?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to have gcc generate assembler code with C source listed?
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unable to install gcc-3.2.3 on RHEL-4 64 bit machine
  • From: ithelp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Unable to install gcc-3.2.3 on RHEL-4 64 bit machine
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unable to install gcc-3.2.3 on RHEL-4 64 bit machine
  • From: ithelp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Unable to install gcc-3.2.3 on RHEL-4 64 bit machine
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Unable to install gcc-3.2.3 on RHEL-4 64 bit machine
  • From: ithelp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Optimization, inline functions
  • From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to have gcc generate assembler code with C source listed?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How to have gcc generate assembler code with C source listed?
  • From: "Chen (陈) Jun (军)" <chjfth@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: OpenMP and Cygwin
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Optimization, inline functions
  • From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
• Optimization, inline functions
  • From: "Lee, Newbie" <utmw0@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Are there static stack analysis tools for MIPS?
  • From: Nicholas Sherlock <n.sherlock@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.3 generates less efficient code than gcc 4.1 or 4.2
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: OpenMP and Cygwin
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• OpenMP and Cygwin
  • From: Ami Marowka <amimar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.3 generates less efficient code than gcc 4.1 or 4.2
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.3 generates less efficient code than gcc 4.1 or 4.2
  • From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.3 generates less efficient code than gcc 4.1 or 4.2
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.3 generates less efficient code than gcc 4.1 or 4.2
  • From: Michael Meissner <gnu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.3 generates less efficient code than gcc 4.1 or 4.2
  • From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.3 generates less efficient code than gcc 4.1 or 4.2
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: using inline functions
  • From: neuuubie <utmw0@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Are there static stack analysis tools for MIPS?
  • From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: using inline functions
  • From: Michael Meissner <meissner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.3 generates less efficient code than gcc 4.1 or 4.2
  • From: Michael Meissner <gnu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• using inline functions
  • From: neuuubie <utmw0@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Assembler instructions not being created correctly for mutiplication in GCC
  • From: MichaelMontcalm <philbertflange@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Assembler instructions not being created correctly for mutiplication in GCC
  • From: MichaelMontcalm <philbertflange@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Assembler instructions not being created correctly for mutiplication in GCC
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Assembler instructions not being created correctly for mutiplication in GCC
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Assembler instructions not being created correctly for mutiplication in GCC
  • From: MichaelMontcalm <philbertflange@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Assembler instructions not being created correctly for mutiplication in GCC
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Assembler instructions not being created correctly for mutiplication in GCC
  • From: MichaelMontcalm <philbertflange@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Assembler instructions not being created correctly for mutiplication in GCC
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Assembler instructions not being created correctly for mutiplication in GCC
  • From: MichaelMontcalm <philbertflange@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Assembler instructions not being created correctly for mutiplication in GCC
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Assembler instructions not being created correctly for mutiplication in GCC
  • From: MichaelMontcalm <philbertflange@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.3 generates less efficient code than gcc 4.1 or 4.2
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Assembler instructions not being created correctly for mutiplication in GCC
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Assembler instructions not being created correctly for mutiplication in GCC
  • From: MichaelMontcalm <philbertflange@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: x86 32-bits compiler use on a 64-bits machine ?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: x86 32-bits compiler use on a 64-bits machine ?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: x86 32-bits compiler use on a 64-bits machine ?
  • From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: x86 32-bits compiler use on a 64-bits machine ?
  • From: Christophe LYON <christophe.lyon@xxxxxx>
• Re: A question about GCC license
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• A question about GCC license
  • From: "Shlomy Marom" <shlomym@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: x86 32-bits compiler use on a 64-bits machine ?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• x86 32-bits compiler use on a 64-bits machine ?
  • From: Christophe LYON <christophe.lyon@xxxxxx>
• Re: int64_t == long long
  • From: Yang Zhang <yanghatespam@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: int64_t == long long
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: int64_t == long long
  • From: Yang Zhang <yanghatespam@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: int64_t == long long
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• segfault in cc1 during compilation
  • From: Jason Stover <jhs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [C++] IPv6 compatibility
  • From: Sven Eschenberg <eschenb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: int64_t == long long
  • From: Yang Zhang <yanghatespam@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: int64_t == long long
  • From: "Wesley Smith" <wesley.hoke@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: int64_t == long long
  • From: Yang Zhang <yanghatespam@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: int64_t == long long
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• int64_t == long long
  • From: Yang Zhang <yanghatespam@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What am I missing?
  • From: JJ <jj3666@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What am I missing?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What am I missing?
  • From: "Andrew Bell" <andrew.bell.ia@xxxxxxxxx>
• What am I missing?
  • From: JJ <jj3666@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc is not doing anything
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc is not doing anything
  • From: Rudra Banerjee <bnrj.rudra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile Error - Upgrading gcc version
  • From: "Luis Molina" <lufemo@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Efficently scanning a bit array
  • From: "Andrew Bell" <andrew.bell.ia@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Efficently scanning a bit array
  • From: "Chris Jefferson" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Efficently scanning a bit array
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: free (static_array)
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Efficently scanning a bit array
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: objdump says 'no recognized debugging informatio'
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• objdump says 'no recognized debugging informatio'
  • From: Sharath Manjunatha <shamanju@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: free (static_array)
  • From: rkiesling <rkiesling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Efficently scanning a bit array
  • From: "Chris Jefferson" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Enable inline functions & Turning trigraph off
  • From: Eus <eus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: why does gcc fail to compile `printf("1 -- " __FUNCTION__ "\n")' ?
  • From: Dan Hipschman <dsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• why does gcc fail to compile `printf("1 -- " __FUNCTION__ "\n")' ?
  • From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pthread and OpenMP deadlock
  • From: Emmanuel Hislen <emmanuel.hislen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Compile Error - Upgrading gcc version
  • From: "Luis Molina" <lufemo@xxxxxxxxx>
• Pthread and OpenMP deadlock
  • From: Emmanuel Hislen <emmanuel.hislen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building the toolchain
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building the toolchain
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [C++] IPv6 compatibility
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [C++] IPv6 compatibility
  • From: "Rick Otten" <rotten@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.x without libiconv
  • From: Glenn Burkhardt <gbburkhardt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: getting gcc mailing list archives
  • From: Eus <eus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Enable inline functions & Turning trigraph off
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Difference between two optimization settings
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: warnings about empty function bodies.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: macros and defines used in file
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: Rémi Cardona <remi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• macros and defines used in file
  • From: "Jędrzej Dudkiewicz" <jedrzej.dudkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: recompiling dlopen'ed modules crashes application
  • From: Jacob Ole Juul Kolding <dacobi@xxxxxxxxx>
• recompiling dlopen'ed modules crashes application
  • From: Jacob Ole Juul Kolding <dacobi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Enable inline functions & Turning trigraph off
  • From: Itay Yatsiv <iyatsiv@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems to install gcc
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: getting gcc mailing list archives
  • From: Eus <eus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Include path problem
  • From: Cooper Clauson <ceclauson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• problems to install gcc
  • From: Kay Schröer <Kay.Schroeer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Difference between two optimization settings
  • From: Thomas Heinz <thomasheinz@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Difference between two optimization settings
  • From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Difference between two optimization settings
  • From: Thomas Heinz <thomasheinz@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Converting Directx8 LIB to a DLL
  • From: "corey taylor" <corey.taylor@xxxxxxxxx>
• Converting Directx8 LIB to a DLL
  • From: Michael Hutton <michael.hutton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re:[Bug libstdc++/31413] FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_date/wchar_t/4.cc execution test
  • From: ad <dtom77@xxxxxxxxx>
• Building the toolchain
  • From: "Rob Emanuele" <poorarm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Gfortran warnings & exits
  • From: Logan Sailer <lsailer@xxxxxxx>
• Re: make check returns error
  • From: rkiesling <rkiesling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make check returns error
  • From: ad <dtom77@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -lm not required when including functions from math.h
  • From: Harvey Muller <hlmuller@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -lm not required when including functions from math.h
  • From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• -lm not required when including functions from math.h
  • From: Harvey Muller <hlmuller@xxxxxxxxx>
• warnings about empty function bodies.
  • From: "Ramana Radhakrishnan" <ramana.r@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: __sync_val_compare_and_swap_16
  • From: Robert Lemmen <robertle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make check returns error
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: __sync_val_compare_and_swap_16
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• __sync_val_compare_and_swap_16
  • From: Robert Lemmen <robertle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 64-bit enums and left shift operator - invalid code or GCC bug?
  • From: Jens Kilian <jens.kilian@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 64-bit enums and left shift operator - invalid code or GCC bug?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 64-bit enums and left shift operator - invalid code or GCC bug?
  • From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• 64-bit enums and left shift operator - invalid code or GCC bug?
  • From: Jens Kilian <jjk@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Q. about POD with const member (or g++ vs. Comeau)
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error : Unrecognizable insn
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Q. about POD with const member (or g++ vs. Comeau)
  • From: Stefan Naewe <stefan.naewe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Q. about POD with const member (or g++ vs. Comeau)
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make check returns error
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: const void* and goto *expr
  • From: "Igor Bukanov" <igor@xxxxxxxx>
• Error : Unrecognizable insn
  • From: Mosfet <forumer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Q. about POD with const member (or g++ vs. Comeau)
  • From: Stefan Naewe <stefan.naewe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
  • From: Maik Beckmann <beckmann.maik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: const void* and goto *expr
  • From: Eus <eus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: getting gcc mailing list archives
  • From: Eus <eus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
  • From: Maik Beckmann <beckmann.maik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• make check returns error
  • From: ad <dtom77@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with gprof profiling when using cross compiler
  • From: Mark Ahlenius <m_ahlenius@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• function argument error
  • From: "Fern Moon" <fernmoon@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
  • From: Maik Beckmann <beckmann.maik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
  • From: Maik Beckmann <beckmann.maik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: array subscript is not an integer
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
  • From: Maik Beckmann <beckmann.maik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc linking
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
  • From: Maik Beckmann <beckmann.maik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
  • From: Maik Beckmann <beckmann.maik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: array subscript is not an integer
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
  • From: Maik Beckmann <beckmann.maik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
  • From: Maik Beckmann <beckmann.maik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc linking
  • From: "Dima Sorkin" <dima.sorkin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: array subscript is not an integer
  • From: "Manal Helal" <manalorama@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
  • From: Maik Beckmann <beckmann.maik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
  • From: Maik Beckmann <beckmann.maik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: array subscript is not an integer
  • From: "Manal Helal" <manalorama@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ delete operator
  • From: Kevin Gilbert <kevin952@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
  • From: Maik Beckmann <beckmann.maik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: A question about complier for C++
  • From: Fan Lu <carboy.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: A question about complier for C++
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: A question about complier for C++
  • From: Fan Lu <carboy.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: A question about complier for C++
  • From: Fan Lu <carboy.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: A question about complier for C++
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• A question about complier for C++
  • From: Fan Lu <carboy.lu@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Assembly generation chnages between compiler versions
  • From: Sharath Manjunatha <shamanju@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Assembly generation chnages between compiler versions
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Assembly generation chnages between compiler versions
  • From: Sharath Manjunatha <shamanju@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: array subscript is not an integer
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ delete operator
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Assembly generation chnages between compiler versions
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Assembly generation chnages between compiler versions
  • From: Sharath Manjunatha <shamanju@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: Rémi Cardona <remi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Assembly generation chnages between compiler versions
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Assembly generation chnages between compiler versions
  • From: Sharath Manjunatha <shamanju@xxxxxxxxx>
• getting gcc mailing list archives
  • From: Mojmir Svoboda <mojmir.svoboda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• C++ delete operator
  • From: Kevin Gilbert <kevin952@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: array subscript is not an integer
  • From: "Manal Helal" <manalorama@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 32 bit pointers on X86_64 architecture
  • From: Maurizio Vitale <maurizio.vitale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: const void* and goto *expr
  • From: "Igor Bukanov" <igor@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: const void* and goto *expr
  • From: Dan Hipschman <dsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 32 bit pointers on X86_64 architecture
  • From: Maurizio Vitale <maurizio.vitale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• const void* and goto *expr
  • From: "Igor Bukanov" <igor@xxxxxxxx>
• gcc linking
  • From: mcwalker@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 32 bit pointers on X86_64 architecture
  • From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 32 bit pointers on X86_64 architecture
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 32 bit pointers on X86_64 architecture
  • From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• 32 bit pointers on X86_64 architecture
  • From: Maurizio Vitale <maurizio.vitale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GIMPLE example
  • From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: array subscript is not an integer
  • From: "Manal Helal" <manalorama@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: array subscript is not an integer
  • From: Jim Cobban <jcobban@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: array subscript is not an integer
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• error: array subscript is not an integer
  • From: "Manal Helal" <manalorama@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: please confirm serious objective-c bug in gcc-4.x.x
  • From: Robert William Fuller <hydrologiccycle@xxxxxxxxx>
• please confirm serious objective-c bug in gcc-4.x.x
  • From: Robert William Fuller <hydrologiccycle@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• GIMPLE example
  • From: "Fern Moon" <fernmoon@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: Rémi Cardona <remi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: Rémi Cardona <remi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: Rémi Cardona <remi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: Rémi Cardona <remi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Alignment issue on x86_64?
  • From: Rémi Cardona <remi.cardona@xxxxxx>
• Re: Portable "add with carry" loop for arbitrary precision arithmetic
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: heap fragmentation & operator new
  • From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: heap fragmentation & operator new
  • From: Burlen Loring <burlen.loring@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: glibc crashes: realloc(): invalid next size
  • From: "Shamir Stein" <shamir@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Portable "add with carry" loop for arbitrary precision arithmetic
  • From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: glibc crashes: realloc(): invalid next size
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: any way to disable a single *instance* of a GCC warning?
  • From: "Rainer Gerhards" <rgerhards@xxxxxxxxx>
• glibc crashes: realloc(): invalid next size
  • From: "Shamir Stein" <shamir@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: heap fragmentation & operator new
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: any way to disable a single *instance* of a GCC warning?
  • From: "Martin Guy" <martinwguy@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: any way to disable a single *instance* of a GCC warning?
  • From: "Rainer Gerhards" <rgerhards@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: any way to disable a single *instance* of a GCC warning?
  • From: "Rainer Gerhards" <rgerhards@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: any way to disable a single *instance* of a GCC warning?
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• any way to disable a single *instance* of a GCC warning?
  • From: "Rainer Gerhards" <rgerhards@xxxxxxxxx>
• Regarding GCOV cross-compilation support for ARM
  • From: "vrukesh panse" <vrukesh.panse@xxxxxxxxx>
• loop representation in gcc during parsing
  • From: Isil Dillig <isil@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Portable "add with carry" loop for arbitrary precision arithmetic
  • From: "Alexander Konovalenko" <alexkon@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: heap fragmentation & operator new
  • From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
• heap fragmentation & operator new
  • From: Burlen Loring <burlen.loring@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: vector of aligned elements
  • From: Eus <eus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dlopen from a child process to access parent process functions
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: program runs until end of subroutine!
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: program runs until end of subroutine!
  • From: "corey taylor" <corey.taylor@xxxxxxxxx>
• program runs until end of subroutine!
  • From: "fatemeh.mirjani" <f_mirjani@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: "Fast Fourier Transform of a Step-function in 3-dimonsional" please help me.
  • From: Vincent Torri <vtorri@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• "Fast Fourier Transform of a Step-function in 3-dimonsional" please help me.
  • From: "fatemeh.mirjani" <f_mirjani@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• dlopen from a child process to access parent process functions
  • From: Ravindra Jejurikar <jezziejezz@xxxxxxxxx>
• "relocation truncated to fit" error using Coldfire target.
  • From: "Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini" <luigi.mantellini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: #if does not work!
  • From: Unga <unga888@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: #if does not work!
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: #if does not work!
  • From: Unga <unga888@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: #if does not work!
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• #if does not work!
  • From: Unga <unga888@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should we remove java from the default bootstrap languages?
  • From: rkiesling <rkiesling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• 64 bit register use for inline assembly
  • From: "Derek Bouius" <dbouius@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re:Re:FRIEND_CLASS_TYPEDEF
  • From: Eus <eus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• vector of aligned elements
  • From: "massimiliano cialdi" <cialdi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Error while compiling libstdc++-v3 in gcc 4.3.1 on tru64 v5.1b
  • From: Didier Godefroy <dg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does gcc4 dislike this code?
  • From: Christopher Layne <clayne@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC and OpenMP
  • From: Sophia Han <ehan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: coldfire and soft-float
  • From: "Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini" <luigi.mantellini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: gmp.h: No such file or directory
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: gmp.h: No such file or directory
  • From: Martin Krischik <krischik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: gmp.h: No such file or directory
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: coldfire and soft-float
  • From: "Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini" <luigi.mantellini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• error: gmp.h: No such file or directory
  • From: Martin Krischik <krischik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.2.2 -O2 bug??
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: coldfire and soft-float
  • From: "Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini" <luigi.mantellini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: coldfire and soft-float
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: coldfire and soft-float
  • From: "Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini" <luigi.mantellini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does gcc4 dislike this code?
  • From: John Walsh <john.walsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: coldfire and soft-float
  • From: "Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini" <luigi.mantellini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: How do I resolve this warning
  • From: "Rupert Wood" <me@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.2.2 -O2 bug??
  • From: "CH Gowri Kumar - గౌరీ కుమార్" <gkumar007@xxxxxxxxx>
• How do I resolve this warning
  • From: smac5 <scott_mcdade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does gcc4 dislike this code?
  • From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does gcc4 dislike this code?
  • From: jlh <jlh@xxxxxx>
• Re: Why does gcc4 dislike this code?
  • From: walt <w41ter@xxxxxxxxx>
• Why does gcc4 dislike this code?
  • From: walt <w41ter@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does gcc4 dislike this code?
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: coldfire and soft-float
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Why does gcc4 dislike this code?
  • From: walt <wa1ter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: coldfire and soft-float
  • From: "Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini" <luigi.mantellini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: coldfire and soft-float
  • From: "Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini" <luigi.mantellini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with symlinks during libstdc++ build (was: gcc-help Digest 18 Jun 2008 01:13:58 -0000 Issue 2753)
  • From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@xxxxxx>
• Reason behind not implementing some instructions of H8SX targets in H8300 port
  • From: "Deepen Mantri" <Deepen.Mantri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: "Fast Fourier Transform of a step-function in 3-dimonsional"
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: coldfire and soft-float
  • From: "Martin Guy" <martinwguy@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: ld - NOCROSSREFS
  • From: John Walsh <john.walsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.2.2 -O2 bug??
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems with char * return from a function
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.2.2 -O2 bug??
  • From: Boris Boesler <baembel@xxxxxx>
• gcc-4.2.2 -O2 bug??
  • From: "CH Gowri Kumar - గౌరీ కుమార్" <gkumar007@xxxxxxxxx>
• "Fast Fourier Transform of a step-function in 3-dimonsional"
  • From: "fatemeh.mirjani" <f_mirjani@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-help Digest 18 Jun 2008 01:13:58 -0000 Issue 2753
  • From: Bob Walters <bob.s.walters@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems with char * return from a function
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: ld - NOCROSSREFS
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• coldfire and soft-float
  • From: "Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini" <luigi.mantellini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• ld - NOCROSSREFS
  • From: John Walsh <john.walsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.3.0 problem: Bootstrap comparison failure!
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.3.0 problem: Bootstrap comparison failure!
  • From: Javier Alarcón Pérez <javier.alarcon@xxxxxxxxxx>
• question on loop representation in CFGs (-fdump-tree-cfg)
  • From: Elena Vorobev <ElenaVorobev@xxxxxx>
• RE: STL without libstdc++
  • From: Michael T <raselmsh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with symlinks during libstdc++ build
  • From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@xxxxxx>
• Re:Re:FRIEND_CLASS_TYPEDEF
  • From: Eus <eus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: CPAN - ERROR: failed to install HTML::HeadParser
  • From: rkiesling <rkiesling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: CPAN - ERROR: failed to install HTML::HeadParser
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• CPAN - ERROR: failed to install HTML::HeadParser
  • From: Car54 <planetwealth@xxxxxxxxx>
• problem with symlinks during libstdc++ build
  • From: Bob Walters <bob.s.walters@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: std::string crasher - _S_empty_rep_storage hidden visibility bites my backside
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• bad gcno generation
  • From: Michael Morrell <morrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re: AW: STL without libstdc++
  • From: "Timothy C Prince" <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AW: STL without libstdc++
  • From: "Timothy C Prince" <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• std::string crasher - _S_empty_rep_storage hidden visibility bites my backside
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc include path problem?
  • From: vicpk4 <gavrilov_victor@xxxxxxx>
• AW: STL without libstdc++
  • From: "Kaul, Martin" <martin.kaul@xxxxxxxx>
• STL without libstdc++
  • From: Michael T <raselmsh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems with char * return from a function
  • From: Eus <eus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc include path problem?
  • From: Eus <eus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems with char * return from a function
  • From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems with char * return from a function
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems with char * return from a function
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: FRIEND_CLASS_TYPEDEF
  • From: Eus <eus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems with char * return from a function
  • From: Eus <eus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem compiling gcc 4.3.0:
  • From: Eus <eus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: gcc/contrib/CompareSumTests3 not working
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: gcc/contrib/CompareSumTests3 not working
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc/contrib/CompareSumTests3 not working
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Cross-compiling issue with GCC 4.3.1
  • From: <forumer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extern template and compile time
  • From: "Gael Guennebaud" <g.gael@xxxxxxx>
• extern template and compile time
  • From: <g.gael@xxxxxxx>
• RE: Wno-packed flag not working?
  • From: "John Morrison" <JMorrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it safe to save just part of registers in interrupt/exception handler?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how about performance of the program compiled by -O2 other than -Os?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it safe to save just part of registers in interrupt/exception handler?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Is it safe to save just part of registers in interrupt/exception handler?
  • From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Older version of GCC needed in CentOS 5.1
  • From: Mustafa Akgul <akgul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc include path problem?
  • From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help: problem with the gcc c++ 4.3.0 compiler
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how about performance of the program compiled by -O2 other than -Os?
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• how about performance of the program compiled by -O2 other than -Os?
  • From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to inform gcc not to save registers on entering a function?
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc include path problem?
  • From: vicpk4 <gavrilov_victor@xxxxxxx>
• How to inform gcc not to save registers on entering a function?
  • From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Wno-packed flag not working?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Wno-packed flag not working?
  • From: "John Morrison" <JMorrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: CMT option with gcc
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux 64 core dump issue (gcc 3.4.3 and gcc3.4.6)
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Older version of GCC needed in CentOS 5.1
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re: CMT option with gcc
  • From: "Timothy C Prince" <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: CMT option with gcc
  • From: vikas <pvssvikas@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: CMT option with gcc
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux 64 core dump issue (gcc 3.4.3 and gcc3.4.6)
  • From: "Bhat, Ajit" <abhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux 64 core dump issue (gcc 3.4.3 and gcc3.4.6)
  • From: "Bhat, Ajit" <abhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• CMT option with gcc
  • From: vikas <pvssvikas@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems with char * return from a function
  • From: Dan Hipschman <dsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems with char * return from a function
  • From: "corey taylor" <corey.taylor@xxxxxxxxx>
• Older version of GCC needed in CentOS 5.1
  • From: Car54 <planetwealth@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems with char * return from a function
  • From: Bob Smith <bsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• problems with char * return from a function
  • From: "Vardhan, Sundara (GE Infra, Energy)" <sundara.vardhan@xxxxxx>
• Re: -mfpmath=387 should enable x387 intrinsics on m64
  • From: "Jiri Hladky" <hladky.jiri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Problem compiling shared lib since 4.2.3
  • From: Bjoern Biesenbach <bjoern@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LIBRARY_PATH not used before /usr/lib anymore in gcc 4.2 and later?
  • From: Frederik Himpe <fhimpe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LIBRARY_PATH not used before /usr/lib anymore in gcc 4.2 and later?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LIBRARY_PATH not used before /usr/lib anymore in gcc 4.2 and later?
  • From: Frederik Himpe <fhimpe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: init code
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
• init code
  • From: <dreese@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LIBRARY_PATH not used before /usr/lib anymore in gcc 4.2 and later?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LIBRARY_PATH not used before /usr/lib anymore in gcc 4.2 and later?
  • From: Frederik <freggy@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Can CPP process only one "conditional" ?
  • From: "Young, Michael" <Michael.Young@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can CPP process only one "conditional" ?
  • From: adlv <amaury.delavaissiere@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: LIBRARY_PATH not used before /usr/lib anymore in gcc 4.2 and later?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LIBRARY_PATH not used before /usr/lib anymore in gcc 4.2 and later?
  • From: Frederik <freggy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LIBRARY_PATH not used before /usr/lib anymore in gcc 4.2 and later?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• LIBRARY_PATH not used before /usr/lib anymore in gcc 4.2 and later?
  • From: Frederik <freggy@xxxxxxxxx>
• FRIEND_CLASS_TYPEDEF
  • From: Kalugsky Uriy <urik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can CPP process only one "conditional" ?
  • From: Fabian Cenedese <Cenedese@xxxxxxxx>
• Can CPP process only one "conditional" ?
  • From: adlv <amaury.delavaissiere@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with gprof profiling when using cross compiler
  • From: "Martin Guy" <martinwguy@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: -mfpmath=387 should enable x387 intrinsics on m64
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• problem with gprof profiling when using cross compiler
  • From: m_ahlenius@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: New at c++
  • From: Lopezio <geral@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: New at c++
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• allowing #warning with -Werror
  • From: John Breitenbach <breiten@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• New at c++
  • From: Lopezio <geral@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Help: problem with the gcc c++ 4.3.0 compiler
  • From: Francois Mallinger <mallfra@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: MPFR lib path missing from compile command(s) duringconfiguration?
  • From: "Eric Lemings" <Eric.Lemings@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling instructions unclear gcc-4.3.0
  • From: "Nick England" <nickengland@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: MPFR lib path missing from compile command(s) during configuration?
  • From: rkiesling <rkiesling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Backtrace showing different value from stack?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Backtrace showing different value from stack?
  • From: "Philipp Marek" <philipp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: MPFR lib path missing from compile command(s) during configuration?
  • From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@xxxxxx>
• Getting errors while compilining code with G++ 4.1.2
  • From: Sachin Jadhav <sachinjadhav25@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: MPFR lib path missing from compile command(s) during configuration?
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: MPFR lib path missing from compile command(s) during configuration?
  • From: "Eric Lemings" <Eric.Lemings@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: MPFR lib path missing from compile command(s) during configuration?
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• MPFR lib path missing from compile command(s) during configuration?
  • From: "Eric Lemings" <Eric.Lemings@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to build gcc 4.3.1 using gcc 4.3.0?
  • From: Sven.Hartrumpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: G++/GCC not detetcing stupid errors in code.
  • From: Christopher Layne <clayne@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Opposite of -pedantic.
  • From: "Jason Cipriani" <jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx>
• Building 4.3.1
  • From: Didier Godefroy <dg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unresolved tree_code_type and tree_code_length
  • From: Didier Godefroy <dg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Limiting code size with -g2 with c++ template lib
  • From: Benoît Jacob <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Limiting code size with -g2 with c++ template lib
  • From: Benoît Jacob <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unresolved tree_code_type and tree_code_length
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Eliminating unused functions based on gcov output
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc3 ABI compatibility?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• 64-bit gcc-4.2.2 on SunOS 5.9 with gnu ld - incompatible crti.o
  • From: "Poor Yorick" <org.gnu.gcc.help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to build gcc 4.3.1 using gcc 4.3.0?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How to build gcc 4.3.1 using gcc 4.3.0?
  • From: Sven.Hartrumpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Unresolved tree_code_type and tree_code_length
  • From: Didier Godefroy <dg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling instructions unclear gcc-4.3.0
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Eliminating unused functions based on gcov output
  • From: "Amusing Muses" <amusingmuses@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: moving data between x87 and xmm registers
  • From: "Gautam Sewani" <gautamcool88@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling instructions unclear gcc-4.3.0
  • From: "Nick England" <nickengland@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling instructions unclear gcc-4.3.0
  • From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling instructions unclear gcc-4.3.0
  • From: "Nick England" <nickengland@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling instructions unclear gcc-4.3.0
  • From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling instructions unclear gcc-4.3.0
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Compiling instructions unclear gcc-4.3.0
  • From: "Nick England" <nickengland@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: moving data between x87 and xmm registers
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: moving data between x87 and xmm registers
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: moving data between x87 and xmm registers
  • From: "Frédéric Bastien" <nouiz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: moving data between x87 and xmm registers
  • From: "Gautam Sewani" <gautamcool88@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: moving data between x87 and xmm registers
  • From: "Gautam Sewani" <gautamcool88@xxxxxxxxx>
• problem compiling gcc 4.3.0:
  • From: Javier Alarcón Pérez <javier.alarcon@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about modifying gcc
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GOMP Threadprivate on Darwin/non-ELF
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• GOMP Threadprivate on Darwin/non-ELF
  • From: Matt Fago <fago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: "relocation overflow" and "relocation truncated to fit errors" for Fortran application with g77 compiler
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc3 ABI compatibility?
  • From: Michael VanLoon <michaelv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc3 ABI compatibility?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: moving data between x87 and xmm registers
  • From: "Frédéric Bastien" <nouiz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: "relocation overflow" and "relocation truncated to fit errors" for Fortran application with g77 compiler
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: moving data between x87 and xmm registers
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• "relocation overflow" and "relocation truncated to fit errors" for Fortran application with g77 compiler
  • From: "sameer sinha" <sinha.sam0201@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: nanosleep issue
  • From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• moving data between x87 and xmm registers
  • From: "Gautam Sewani" <gautamcool88@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: does gcc fortran test suite contains "64 bit gfortarn compiler test suite??"
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• nanosleep issue
  • From: "Vardhan, Sundara (GE Infra, Energy)" <sundara.vardhan@xxxxxx>
• Re: c++ and whole-program optimization
  • From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why g++ does not emit any information for a local variable in a template class member function?
  • From: "Peng Yu" <pengyu.ut@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc3 ABI compatibility?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc3 ABI compatibility?
  • From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc3 ABI compatibility?
  • From: Michael VanLoon <michaelv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Simplification of relational expressions
  • From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Simplification of relational expressions
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Simplification of relational expressions
  • From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Simplification of relational expressions
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why g++ does not emit any information for a local variable in a template class member function?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Simplification of relational expressions
  • From: Chris Thiel <cthiel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• c++ and whole-program optimization
  • From: "Philippe Suter" <psuter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc3 ABI compatibility?
  • From: Michael VanLoon <michaelv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where should libiberty.a be installed? (addendum)
  • From: IainS <developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where should libiberty.a be installed?
  • From: IainS <developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: undefined reference to `__w32_sharedptr_unexpected'
  • From: Aaron Patton <aaron.patton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where should libiberty.a be installed?
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where should libiberty.a be installed?
  • From: IainS <developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where should libiberty.a be installed?
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: code questions.
  • From: Tony Wetmore <tony.wetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: specialize a template function out of its namespace
  • From: Daniel Lohmann <daniel.lohmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++: declaration of a friend from within a namespace
  • From: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where should libiberty.a be installed?
  • From: IainS <developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• does gcc fortran test suite contains "64 bit gfortarn compiler test suite??"
  • From: "sameer sinha" <sinha.sam0201@xxxxxxxxx>
• specialize a template function out of its namespace
  • From: "Yunior Peralta González" <yperaltag@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: code questions.
  • From: "Scott Phuong" <mycleanjunk@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: code questions.
  • From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: code questions.
  • From: "Scott Phuong" <mycleanjunk@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: code questions.
  • From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
• code questions.
  • From: "Scott Phuong" <mycleanjunk@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where should libiberty.a be installed?
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Function Prototype Generation
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: undefined reference to `__w32_sharedptr_unexpected'
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: undefined reference to `__w32_sharedptr_unexpected'
  • From: Aaron Patton <aaron.patton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++: declaration of a friend from within a namespace
  • From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: undefined reference to `__w32_sharedptr_unexpected'
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: undefined reference to `__w32_sharedptr_unexpected'
  • From: Aaron Patton <aaron.patton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: undefined reference to `__w32_sharedptr_unexpected'
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: undefined reference to `__w32_sharedptr_unexpected'
  • From: Aaron Patton <aaron.patton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Where should libiberty.a be installed?
  • From: IainS <developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: undefined reference to `__w32_sharedptr_unexpected'
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• undefined reference to `__w32_sharedptr_unexpected'
  • From: Aaron Patton <aaron.patton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Function Prototype Generation
  • From: Bob Smith <bsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Can I set GCC to search sub-directories for includes.
  • From: Andrew SG Rojek <development.admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• g++: declaration of a friend from within a namespace
  • From: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Function Prototype Generation
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Function Prototype Generation
  • From: Bob Smith <bsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Cross-compiling gcc 4.3.0 to arm-wince-pe : Binutils error
  • From: <forumer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: build failt on darwin building gcc 3.4.6 with gcc-core and g++
  • From: "Thijs Burema" <thijsb.spam@xxxxxxxxx>
• error: conversion from... not supported by iconv
  • From: "Ian S. Worthington" <IanWorthington@xxxxxxx>
• install issue when configured with ; --program-suffix=-X.Y.Z
  • From: Iain D Sandoe <iain.sandoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Need help dealing with binary vendor-provided GCC
  • From: Alex Austin <alex.austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• compiling gcc-3.2 on opteron
  • From: Mustafa Akgul <akgul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Again: shared libraries and uncaught exceptions (OpenSolaris, x86, gcc-3.4.6)
  • From: ingo@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Problems with pointer-to-members
  • From: Guilherme Müller <gmuller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems with pointer-to-members
  • From: Richard Harvey Chapman <hchapman-gcc-help@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems with pointer-to-members
  • From: David Sveningsson <ext@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc Digest of: get.146919
  • From: Alex Turjan <aturjan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc Digest of: get.146919_146919
  • From: Alex Turjan <aturjan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Prevent libintl in /usr/local to be used
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>