-----Original Message----- From: "Timothy C Prince" <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: martin.kaul@xxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:22:57 +0000 Subject: Re: AW: STL without libstdc++ -----Original Message----- From: "Kaul, Martin" <martin.kaul@xxxxxxxx> To: <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:15:48 +0200 Subject: AW: STL without libstdc++ Hi > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx]Im > Auftrag von Michael T > > I would like to ask whether it is possible to use the STL > with g++ without > having the object code depend on libstdc++? Take a look to http://www.dietmar-kuehl.de/cxxrt/ Together with http://sourceware.org/newlib/ you also do not need libstd __________________________ Does newlib support C++ exceptions mainly with sjlj; if so, is that considered disadvantageous compared with libstdc++ ? I suppose these alternate libraries are considered mainly for targets where libstdc++ isn't supported. ___________________ For the targets where I've seen newlib used, libstdc++ is built on top of it, so there's no STL support without libstdc++. libstdc++ may be linked statically, so that that it is not required at run time. Tim Prince
