Re: intializing the variables and compling with optimization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



J M Sharath Bharadwaj bharadwaj wrote:
Is GCC going to perform a better optimization, if I am going to
initialize the variable explicitly. I am asking this because I was
reading the GCC online doc for warning options like as in
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/cgi-bin/info2www?(gcc.info)Warning%20Options

Maybe you need to give some example code to explain the question you are trying to ask.

The optional warning for uninitialized automatic variables may catch programming errors that involve actual use of uninitialized values, but more often it generates false warnings where the compiler fails to understand the flow of control and doesn't realize no possible path through the code uses the uninitialized value.

Many programmers add an unnecessary initial value to variables, so they can eliminate the false warning while leaving that type of warning enabled (for its benefits when the code really is wrong). In most cases adding an unnecessary initialization will make the code slightly less optimized. I'm sure one could construct some strange example in which adding an unnecessary initialization would make the code more optimal, but it would need to be pretty strange.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux