GCC Help

• Thread Index

• lions and tigers and LDFLAGS, oh my!
  • From: "Poor Yorick" <org.gnu.gcc.help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Understanging the use of inline funtions
  • From: "Tobias Föhst" <foehst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: static array of strings?
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Request about adding a new micro support
  • From: Alessio Igor Bogani <alessioigorbogani@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: structure packing
  • From: Mohamed Shafi <shafitvm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ok to add -fPIC to non shared library?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 32-bit libraries in 64-bit build.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• static array of strings?
  • From: "Sean Draine" <seandr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: structure packing
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling stdc++ with strong symbol versioning
  • From: Michael Dehmlow <dehmlowm@xxxxxxxxx>
• warning: '0' flag used with '%p' printf format
  • From: John Breitenbach <breiten@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• ok to add -fPIC to non shared library?
  • From: Tim Pushor <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 32-bit libraries in 64-bit build.
  • From: Michael Meissner <meissner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 32-bit libraries in 64-bit build.
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: inline assembly issue
  • From: Tomek <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• inline assembly issue
  • From: tysunset <yi.tang@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling stdc++ with strong symbol versioning
  • From: Michael Dehmlow <dehmlowm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling stdc++ with strong symbol versioning
  • From: Michael Dehmlow <dehmlowm@xxxxxxxxx>
• structure packing
  • From: Mohamed Shafi <shafitvm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Issue on Solaris box
  • From: santosh k <sanushks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Issue on Solaris box
  • From: Philip Herron <herron.philip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Wrong delete called for exported class that has virtual destructor.
  • From: Wallace Wang <Wallace.Wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Issue on Solaris box
  • From: santosh k <sanushks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling stdc++ with strong symbol versioning
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• good c flags for Atom N270?
  • From: Pavel Dudrenov <dudrenov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling stdc++ with strong symbol versioning
  • From: Michael Dehmlow <dehmlowm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building GCC 4.0.4 on 64 bit Linux
  • From: Michael Meissner <meissner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling stdc++ with strong symbol versioning
  • From: Michael Dehmlow <dehmlowm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Building GCC 4.0.4 on 64 bit Linux
  • From: Brendon Costa <brendon.j.costa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling stdc++ with strong symbol versioning
  • From: Michael Dehmlow <dehmlowm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.4.0 build Make command fails
  • From: Tony Wetmore <tony.wetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.4.0 build Make command fails
  • From: jjrkeenan@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: 32-bit libraries in 64-bit build.
  • From: Michael Meissner <meissner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 32-bit libraries in 64-bit build.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 32-bit libraries in 64-bit build.
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: 32-bit libraries in 64-bit build.
  • From: Michael Meissner <meissner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 32-bit libraries in 64-bit build.
  • From: Brian McGrew <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 32-bit libraries in 64-bit build.
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx: [PATCH 0/3] tracepoints: delay argument evaluation]
  • From: Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 32-bit libraries in 64-bit build.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• 32-bit libraries in 64-bit build.
  • From: Brian McGrew <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx: [PATCH 0/3] tracepoints: delay argument evaluation]
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Wrong delete called for exported class that has virtual destructor.
  • From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
• Wrong delete called for exported class that has virtual destructor.
  • From: Wallace Wang <Wallace.Wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling stdc++ with strong symbol versioning
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems compiling library
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• problems compiling library
  • From: Wilbert Weijer <wilbert@xxxxxxxx>
• Compiling stdc++ with strong symbol versioning
  • From: Michael Dehmlow <dehmlowm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: IPO over multiple source files
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Uninitilised variable detection in C++
  • From: Axel Freyn <axel-freyn@xxxxxx>
• Uninitilised variable detection in C++
  • From: naveen yadav <yad.naveen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Uninitilised variable detection in C++
  • From: naveen yadav <yad.naveen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: built gcc-4.4.0, most tests failed, is it usable?
  • From: Amitava Dutta <ad_101@xxxxxxxxx>
• IPO over multiple source files
  • From: sroy <sroy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Configuration problem: not recognizing MPFR
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Trouble Migrating from Windows to Linux
  • From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Trouble Migrating from Windows to Linux
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Trouble Migrating from Windows to Linux
  • From: James Cobban <jamescobban@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• compiling with uclibc?
  • From: Jim Hauxwell <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Front-ends
  • From: Philip Herron <herron.philip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Front-ends
  • From: Andi Hellmund <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Front-ends
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Front-ends
  • From: Philip Herron <herron.philip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: failure building - cc1.exe requires an allocation of 3.5GB?
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• failure building - cc1.exe requires an allocation of 3.5GB?
  • From: Jim Hauxwell <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Configuration problem: not recognizing MPFR
  • From: Damian Rouson <damian@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Configuration problem: not recognizing MPFR
  • From: Philip Herron <herron.philip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: built gcc-4.4.0, most tests failed, is it usable?
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: built gcc-4.4.0, most tests failed, is it usable?
  • From: Amitava Dutta <ad_101@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Configuration problem: not recognizing MPFR
  • From: Damian Rouson <damian@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.4.0
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Configuration problem: not recognizing MPFR
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Build on macosx - gcc4.4.0
  • From: Philip Herron <herron.philip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.4.0
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.4.0
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.4.0
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.4.0
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.4.0
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.4.0
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Configuration problem: not recognizing MPFR
  • From: Damian Rouson <damian@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Configuration problem: not recognizing MPFR
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Configuration problem: not recognizing MPFR
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.4.0 libstdc++ build failed
  • From: Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.4.0 libstdc++ build failed
  • From: "M R Swami Reddy" <MR.Swami.Reddy@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Configuration problem: not recognizing MPFR
  • From: Damian Rouson <damian@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Configuration problem: not recognizing MPFR
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Configuration problem: not recognizing MPFR
  • From: Damian Rouson <damian@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.4.0
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.4.0
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.4.0 libstdc++ build failed
  • From: Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@xxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-4.4.0 libstdc++ build failed
  • From: "M R Swami Reddy" <MR.Swami.Reddy@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.4.0
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.4.0
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: built gcc-4.4.0, most tests failed, is it usable?
  • From: Amitava Dutta <ad_101@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: built gcc-4.4.0, most tests failed, is it usable?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• built gcc-4.4.0, most tests failed, is it usable?
  • From: Amitava Dutta <ad_101@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.4.0 build fails
  • From: "M R Swami Reddy" <MR.Swami.Reddy@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.4.0
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.4.0
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.4.0
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.4.0
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Custom calling convention
  • From: Vladimir Kuznetsov <ks.vladimir@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: PRE_DEC, POST_INC, how to ?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Disabling warning: suggest parentheses around && within ||
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.4.0 build fails
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.4.0
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Custom calling convention
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Disabling warning: suggest parentheses around && within ||
  • From: Andre Majorel <aym-ccg@xxxxxxxxx>
• PRE_DEC, POST_INC, how to ?
  • From: Florent DEFAY <spira.inhabitant@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Disabling warning: suggest parentheses around && within ||
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Disabling warning: suggest parentheses around && within ||
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Disabling warning: suggest parentheses around && within ||
  • From: Andre Majorel <aym-ccg@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-4.4.0 build fails
  • From: "M R Swami Reddy" <MR.Swami.Reddy@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Custom calling convention
  • From: Vladimir Kuznetsov <ks.vladimir@xxxxxxxxx>
• Building gcc-4.4.0
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Custom calling convention
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Custom calling convention
  • From: Vladimir Kuznetsov <ks.vladimir@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does 'const' make structure pointers incompatible?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Why does 'const' make structure pointers incompatible?
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: default template class argument confuses g++?
  • From: andre maute <andre.maute@xxxxxx>
• Re: PPC GCC Inline assembly help
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• default template class argument confuses g++?
  • From: "Andreas Buykx" <andreas.buykx@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ctype constructor - wrong code generated
  • From: "M R Swami Reddy" <MR.Swami.Reddy@xxxxxxx>
• Re: how to switch between different versions shared libraires?
  • From: Yinon Ehrlich <yinon.me@xxxxxxxxx>
• how to switch between different versions shared libraires?
  • From: 明覺 <shi.minjue@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ctype constructor - wrong code generated
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: add new optimization pass to the GCC optimizations
  • From: Andi Hellmund <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is this a feature ?
  • From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Warning for non-portable integer operations?
  • From: Mark Dickinson <dickinsm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Is this a feature ?
  • From: "raok@xxxxxxx" <raok@xxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc optimization option flags
  • From: "M R Swami Reddy" <MR.Swami.Reddy@xxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc optimization option flags
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc optimization option flags
  • From: "M R Swami Reddy" <MR.Swami.Reddy@xxxxxxx>
• ctype constructor - wrong code generated
  • From: "M R Swami Reddy" <MR.Swami.Reddy@xxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc optimization option flags
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: PPC GCC Inline assembly help
  • From: eija_flight <ajie.dirgantara@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc optimization option flags
  • From: "M R Swami Reddy" <MR.Swami.Reddy@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Installation of Compiler Help needed
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Warning for non-portable integer operations?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Installation of Compiler Help needed
  • From: AndrewMcHorney <andrewmchorney@xxxxxxx>
• add new optimization pass to the GCC optimizations
  • From: charfi asma <charfiasma@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: understanding a warning in RTEMS
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: understanding a warning in RTEMS
  • From: Nicholas Sherlock <n.sherlock@xxxxxxxxx>
• understanding a warning in RTEMS
  • From: Chris Johns <chrisj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Warning for non-portable integer operations?
  • From: Mark Dickinson <dickinsm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: PPC GCC Inline assembly help
  • From: Michael Meissner <meissner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Disabling warning: suggest parentheses around && within ||
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Disabling warning: suggest parentheses around && within ||
  • From: Andre Majorel <aym-ccg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Optimization Problem With Data Conversion
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Optimization Problem With Data Conversion
  • From: Raymond Lu <songyulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: OpenMP (gomp) crash at gomp_resolve_num_threads - gcc 4.4
  • From: Dan S <d.a.n.stowell+gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc optimization option flags
  • From: "M R Swami Reddy" <MR.Swami.Reddy@xxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc optimization option flags
  • From: "M R Swami Reddy" <MR.Swami.Reddy@xxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc optimization option flags
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc optimization option flags
  • From: "M R Swami Reddy" <MR.Swami.Reddy@xxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc optimization option flags
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc optimization option flags
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc optimization option flags
  • From: "M R Swami Reddy" <MR.Swami.Reddy@xxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc optimization option flags
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc optimization option flags
  • From: "M R Swami Reddy" <MR.Swami.Reddy@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with flag -fvisibility=hidden and share library
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Linking Libraries?
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Linking Libraries?
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Problem with flag -fvisibility=hidden and share library
  • From: José Luis Pulido Burbano <josel2820@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Linking Libraries?
  • From: Gre7g Luterman <gre7g.luterman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Linking Libraries?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc able to output identifiers?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: PPC GCC Inline assembly help
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Linking Libraries?
  • From: Gre7g Luterman <gre7g.luterman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: "Undefined reference to ..." Errors
  • From: John Farmer <news02@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: instruction ordering
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: "Undefined reference to ..." Errors
  • From: Andi Hellmund <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: instruction ordering
  • From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: instruction ordering
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc able to output identifiers?
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.4.0 build on Solaris 9 on Sparc failing at 3rd stage
  • From: Amitava Dutta <ad_101@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc able to output identifiers?
  • From: Rainer Hochschild <RainerHochschild@xxxxxx>
• Re: instruction ordering
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: instruction ordering
  • From: marian <marian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: instruction ordering
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: instruction ordering
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: instruction ordering
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• instruction ordering
  • From: marian <marian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: PPC GCC Inline assembly help
  • From: eija_flight <ajie.dirgantara@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gnatmake broken on cross-compilation
  • From: xorquewasp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: GIMPLE_OMP_FOR statements
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GIMPLE_OMP_FOR statements
  • From: Aravinda <aravindakidambi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc Plugin: error: ‘FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER’ undeclared
  • From: Aravinda <aravindakidambi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: "Undefined reference to ..." Errors
  • From: John Farmer <news02@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: excluding files from generating profile data
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• excluding files from generating profile data
  • From: Matt <matt@xxxxxxx>
• Re: "Undefined reference to ..." Errors
  • From: John Farmer <news02@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: "Undefined reference to ..." Errors
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• "Undefined reference to ..." Errors
  • From: John Farmer <news02@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: FW: -fprofile-generate.
  • From: Holger Blasum <hbl@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BE] How to query attributes of a function being called?
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help with libmpfr
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Befriending a private member function
  • From: Herwig, Björn <herwig@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help with libmpfr
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BE] How to query attributes of a function being called?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: PPC GCC Inline assembly help
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Befriending a private member function
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BE] How to query attributes of a function being called?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: __attribute__((alias())) for variables?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Help with libmpfr
  • From: Carol LePage <polymnia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.4.0-RC bootstrap failed on i686-pc-solaris2.10
  • From: Rainer Orth <ro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Migration from GCC3.4.3 to GCC4.1.2
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Migration from GCC3.4.3 to GCC4.1.2
  • From: ruks <rukmanisivakumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Migration from GCC3.4.3 to GCC4.1.2
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Migration from GCC3.4.3 to GCC4.1.2
  • From: ruks <rukmanisivakumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BE] How to query attributes of a function being called?
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• PPC GCC Inline assembly help
  • From: eija_flight <ajie.dirgantara@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Befriending a private member function
  • From: Herwig, Björn <herwig@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BE] How to query attributes of a function being called?
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• [Fwd: Re: __attribute__((alias())) for variables?]
  • From: Rabih Chrabieh <chrabieh@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Issue with pointer redirection in inherited clauses
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: __attribute__((alias())) for variables?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pragma directive or predefined for source charset?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BE] How to query attributes of a function being called?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Issue with pointer redirection in inherited clauses
  • From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Issue with pointer redirection in inherited clauses
  • From: Tyler Earman <rem.intellegare@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Issue with pointer redirection in inherited clauses
  • From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Issue with pointer redirection in inherited clauses
  • From: Tyler Earman <rem.intellegare@xxxxxxxxx>
• FW: -fprofile-generate.
  • From: "Cadieux, Yves" <yves.cadieux@xxxxxx>
• __attribute__((alias())) for variables?
  • From: Rabih Chrabieh <chrabieh@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.4.0-RC bootstrap failed on i686-pc-solaris2.10
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does gcc allow implicit conversion from const T* to T* (in C)?
  • From: Sebastian Mach <phresnel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: Why does gcc allow implicit conversion from const T* to T* (in C)?
  • From: Sebastian Mach <phresnel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Pragma directive or predefined for source charset?
  • From: Christopher Jones <cpj_public@xxxxxxx>
• [BE] How to query attributes of a function being called?
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does gcc allow implicit conversion from const T* to T* (in C)?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does gcc allow implicit conversion from const T* to T* (in C)?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fwd: gcc instruction scheduling makes things worse?
  • From: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GIMPLE_OMP_FOR statements
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc Plugin: error: ‘FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER’ undeclared
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.4.0-RC bootstrap failed on i686-pc-solaris2.10
  • From: Rainer Orth <ro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error making cross compiler, gcc 4.4.0, FreeBSD 7.2
  • From: xorquewasp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: GCC compliing from archived sources
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC compliing from archived sources
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC compliing from archived sources
  • From: Stulov Dmitry <stulovd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does gcc optimize "if (constant)" inside while loops?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reducing shared object file size
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Why does gcc allow implicit conversion from const T* to T* (in C)?
  • From: Sebastian Mach <phresnel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error making cross compiler, gcc 4.4.0, FreeBSD 7.2
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Error making cross compiler, gcc 4.4.0, FreeBSD 7.2
  • From: xorquewasp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: GIMPLE_OMP_FOR statements
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• GIMPLE_OMP_FOR statements
  • From: Aravinda <aravindakidambi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Reducing shared object file size
  • From: Marcus Clyne <maccaday@xxxxxxxxx>
• Gcc Plugin: error: ‘FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER’ undeclared
  • From: Aravinda <aravindakidambi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Does gcc optimize "if (constant)" inside while loops?
  • From: Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc & Coldfire
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ 4.x.x chokes when using -fprofile-arcs
  • From: nads <salehi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: usage of properties fields in opt_pass
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: When to use Thumb ?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc & Coldfire
  • From: Gre7g Luterman <gre7g.luterman@xxxxxxxxx>
• usage of properties fields in opt_pass
  • From: Aravinda <aravindakidambi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc & Coldfire
  • From: Matthew Lai <cyberfish@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc & Coldfire
  • From: Gre7g Luterman <gre7g.luterman@xxxxxxxxx>
• When to use Thumb ?
  • From: givemecode <samdomville@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fwd: SSE2 instructions with GCC compiler on windows
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does GCC store pointers in .text segments?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C/C++ Calling assembler
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: C/C++ Calling assembler
  • From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Problem with gcc-4.4.0 with Cortex-m3 and cortex-a9 cpu
  • From: "Ramana Radhakrishnan" <ramana.radhakrishnan@xxxxxxx>
• Problem with gcc-4.4.0 with Cortex-m3 and cortex-a9 cpu
  • From: Nitin Garg <nitingarg98@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: new port's validation
  • From: Michael Meissner <meissner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• C/C++ Calling assembler
  • From: "Michael" <michael.yacc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC -dumpmachine informations available as macros ?
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC -dumpmachine informations available as macros ?
  • From: Vincent De Groote <list.encelade@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Migration from GCC3.4.3 to GCC4.1.2
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [target.h] FUNCTION_ARG et al. called with type=NULL_TREE causes problems.
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: asm with C expression operands (i386)
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [target.h] FUNCTION_ARG et al. called with type=NULL_TREE causes problems.
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Adding the address of an exception/interrupt handler to the vector table
  • From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [target.h] FUNCTION_ARG et al. called with type=NULL_TREE causes problems.
  • From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Migration from GCC3.4.3 to GCC4.1.2
  • From: ruks <rukmanisivakumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] gcc, g++ and dwarf
  • From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fwd: SSE2 instructions with GCC compiler on windows
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Why does GCC store pointers in .text segments?
  • From: Jim Rodriguez <jrodriguez@xxxxxxxx>
• asm with C expression operands (i386)
  • From: Tomek <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Adding the address of an exception/interrupt handler to the vector table
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ability to disable 32-byte alignment of bss/data symbols with size > 32 bytes
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc: "decContext.c:38:43: error: string.h: No such file or directory"
  • From: Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.4.0-RC bootstrap failed on i686-pc-solaris2.10
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Saving/restoring MIPS t-registers on 32-bit systems
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Saving/restoring MIPS t-registers on 32-bit systems
  • From: David VomLehn <dvomlehn@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Saving/restoring MIPS t-registers on 32-bit systems
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Saving/restoring MIPS t-registers on 32-bit systems
  • From: David VomLehn <dvomlehn@xxxxxxxxx>
• Adding the address of an exception/interrupt handler to the vector table
  • From: John Farmer <news02@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.4.0-RC bootstrap failed on i686-pc-solaris2.10
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [target.h] FUNCTION_ARG et al. called with type=NULL_TREE causes problems.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [target.h] FUNCTION_ARG et al. called with type=NULL_TREE causes problems.
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• OpenMP (gomp) crash at gomp_resolve_num_threads - gcc 4.4
  • From: Dan S <d.a.n.stowell+gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [target.h] FUNCTION_ARG et al. called with type=NULL_TREE causes problems.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why "global" variable can't be processed properly?
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: __label__ , internal compiler error:segmentation fault
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why "global" variable can't be processed properly?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiled simulator
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why "global" variable can't be processed properly?
  • From: "Robin.Horde" <robinhorde@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why "global" variable can't be processed properly?
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why "global" variable can't be processed properly?
  • From: "Robin.Horde" <robinhorde@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Ability to disable 32-byte alignment of bss/data symbols with size > 32 bytes
  • From: Yuly Finkelberg <yuly.finkelberg@xxxxxxxxx>
• [target.h] FUNCTION_ARG et al. called with type=NULL_TREE causes problems.
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Register Usage
  • From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@xxxxxxx>
• __label__ , internal compiler error:segmentation fault
  • From: sumanth <sumanth.gundapneni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Register Usage
  • From: John Farmer <news02@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Migration from GCC3.4.3 to GCC4.1.2
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Migration from GCC3.4.3 to GCC4.1.2
  • From: ruks <rukmanisivakumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Register Usage
  • From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Register Usage
  • From: John Farmer <news02@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Register Usage
  • From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@xxxxxxx>
• Compiled simulator
  • From: "Renuka Selvaraj" <renukaselvaraj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: which compiler will it use?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Register Usage
  • From: John Farmer <news02@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• which compiler will it use?
  • From: jerry zhai <jerry.z.mystery@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Doing without GCC's statement-blocks-as-expressions extension
  • From: Nicholas Sherlock <n.sherlock@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Doing without GCC's statement-blocks-as-expressions extension
  • From: Nicholas Sherlock <n.sherlock@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Register Usage
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does -march affect binary compatibility?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Register Usage
  • From: John Farmer <news02@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Does -march affect binary compatibility?
  • From: Joseph Garvin <joseph.h.garvin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Register Usage
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Doing without GCC's statement-blocks-as-expressions extension
  • From: Robert William Fuller <hydrologiccycle@xxxxxxxxx>
• Register Usage
  • From: John Farmer <news02@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: sorry to trouble, but I have no idea about this
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Generation of GENERIC tree
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Core dump on Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm)
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Doing without GCC's statement-blocks-as-expressions extension
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why "global" variable can't be processed properly?
  • From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why "global" variable can't be processed properly?
  • From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• sorry to trouble, but I have no idea about this
  • From: jerry zhai <jerry.z.mystery@xxxxxxxxx>
• Generation of GENERIC tree
  • From: "Renuka Selvaraj" <renukaselvaraj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Difference between -Os and -O2
  • From: Nicholas Sherlock <n.sherlock@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Difference between -Os and -O2
  • From: "Hieu Le Trung" <hieult@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Difference between -Os and -O2
  • From: "Hieu Le Trung" <hieult@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Core dump on Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm)
  • From: Shiladitya Biswas <shiladitya.biswas@xxxxxxxxx>
• Doing without GCC's statement-blocks-as-expressions extension
  • From: Nicholas Sherlock <n.sherlock@xxxxxxxxx>
• Why "global" variable can't be processed properly?
  • From: "Robin.Horde" <robinhorde@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: new port's validation
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Post-processing executable and obj files
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: core dump
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc, g++ and dwarf
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile for Freescale MCF5275
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: new port's validation
  • From: Florent DEFAY <spira.inhabitant@xxxxxxxxx>
• Post-processing executable and obj files
  • From: "Valdimir Volynsky" <vvv@xxxxx>
• Re: Difference between -Os and -O2
  • From: David Favro <gcc-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Port GCC to Mac OS9?
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems Building ppl-0.10.2 with g++-4.4.0 on Open Solaris 2008.11
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Difference between -Os and -O2
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• core dump
  • From: Porwal_Ashutosh@xxxxxxx
• gcc, g++ and dwarf
  • From: ranjith kumar <ranjithproxy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Difference between -Os and -O2
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile for Freescale MCF5275
  • From: "Michael Tsao" <michael.tsao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Difference between -Os and -O2
  • From: Nicholas Sherlock <n.sherlock@xxxxxxxxx>
• Difference between -Os and -O2
  • From: "Hieu Le Trung" <hieult@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems Building ppl-0.10.2 with g++-4.4.0 on Open Solaris 2008.11
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Port GCC to Mac OS9?
  • From: Jay Hill <jayman30usa2@xxxxxx>
• Re: Problems Building ppl-0.10.2 with g++-4.4.0 on Open Solaris 2008.11
  • From: Roberto Bagnara <bagnara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems Building ppl-0.10.2 with g++-4.4.0 on Open Solaris 2008.11
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems Building ppl-0.10.2 with g++-4.4.0 on Open Solaris 2008.11
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems Building ppl-0.10.2 with g++-4.4.0 on Open Solaris 2008.11
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems Building ppl-0.10.2 with g++-4.4.0 on Open Solaris 2008.11
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Problems Building ppl-0.10.2 with g++-4.4.0 on Open Solaris 2008.11
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C parsing + register allocation
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C parsing + register allocation
  • From: Philip Herron <herron.philip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Disabling the use of precompiled .gch headers
  • From: László Monda <laci@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Disabling the use of precompiled .gch headers
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Disabling the use of precompiled .gch headers
  • From: László Monda <laci@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Disabling the use of precompiled .gch headers
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C parsing + register allocation
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: export symbols
  • From: Andi Hellmund <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Disabling the use of precompiled .gch headers
  • From: László Monda <laci@xxxxxxxx>
• C parsing + register allocation
  • From: Philip Herron <herron.philip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-gdb compatibilty
  • From: sumanth <sumanth.gundapneni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: portability of __m128i static initializers between gcc and Microsoft C
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: portability of __m128i static initializers between gcc and Microsoft C
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: portability of __m128i static initializers between gcc and Microsoft C
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to get trunk revision in the gcc configuration output?
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• how to get trunk revision in the gcc configuration output?
  • From: IainS <developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: TYPE_DECL nodes and what type they represent
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• portability of __m128i static initializers between gcc and Microsoft C
  • From: "Blower, Melanie" <melanie.blower@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: new port's validation
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: internal compiler error: in avail_expr_eq, at tree-ssa-dom.c:2055
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• TYPE_DECL nodes and what type they represent
  • From: David Philippi <philippi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: what optimization can be expected?
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: internal compiler error: in avail_expr_eq, at tree-ssa-dom.c:2055
  • From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: what optimization can be expected?
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: what optimization can be expected?
  • From: Burlen Loring <burlen.loring@xxxxxxxxx>
• new port's validation
  • From: Florent DEFAY <spira.inhabitant@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: memory addressed by memory, error
  • From: Florent DEFAY <spira.inhabitant@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 16 bits char string from C to FORTRAN
  • From: Steve Kargl <sgk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• 16 bits char string from C to FORTRAN
  • From: Americo Barbosa da Cunha Junior <americo.cunhajr@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: export symbols
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: internal compiler error: in avail_expr_eq, at tree-ssa-dom.c:2055
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: what optimization can be expected?
  • From: Miles Bader <miles@xxxxxxx>
• Re: internal compiler error: in avail_expr_eq, at tree-ssa-dom.c:2055
  • From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• export symbols
  • From: Alberich de megres <alberich2k5@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.4.0,
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: internal compiler error: in avail_expr_eq, at tree-ssa-dom.c:2055
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc: x86: using fs and gs.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: regarding symbol table
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: regarding symbol table
  • From: Andi Hellmund <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• GFortran Preprocessing
  • From: "Randolph, Christian [USA]" <randolph_christian@xxxxxxx>
• Re: what optimization can be expected?
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• what optimization can be expected?
  • From: burlen <burlen.loring@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-4.4.0,
  • From: Kate Minola <kate01123@xxxxxxxxx>
• internal compiler error: in avail_expr_eq, at tree-ssa-dom.c:2055
  • From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: regarding symbol table
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to statically link a shared object
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Urgent Question regarding GCOV
  • From: Jayashree Ramani <rjayashree@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc: x86: using fs and gs.
  • From: pingved@xxxxxxxxx
• How to statically link a shared object
  • From: Mustafa4LP <mustafa.hussain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• regarding symbol table
  • From: ranjith kumar <ranjithproxy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: QUery regarding target macros ELIMINABLE_REGS and CAN_ELIMINATE.
  • From: sumanth <sumanth.gundapneni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: QUery regarding target macros ELIMINABLE_REGS and CAN_ELIMINATE.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: QUery regarding target macros ELIMINABLE_REGS and CAN_ELIMINATE.
  • From: sumanth <sumanth.gundapneni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems catching std::runtime_error in a .so built with -fPIC
  • From: Hasan Mahmood <hasan.mahm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to compile libstdc++.a libgcc.a with -fPIC ?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: More than 2Gb of static memory with powerpc64
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Urgent Question regarding GCOV
  • From: Ben Elliston <bje@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems catching std::runtime_error in a .so built with -fPIC
  • From: Hasan Mahmood <hasan.mahm@xxxxxxxxx>
• How to compile libstdc++.a libgcc.a with -fPIC ?
  • From: Ulrich Holtmann <Ulrich.Holtmann@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compilation error with gcc4.3 wchar.h:335: first defined here collect2: ld returned 1 exit status *** Error code 1 clearmake: Error: Build script failed for
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems catching std::runtime_error in a .so built with -fPIC
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make gcc-check error exec: expect: not found
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• make gcc-check error exec: expect: not found
  • From: Aravinda <aravindakidambi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Compilation error with gcc4.3 wchar.h:335: first defined here collect2: ld returned 1 exit status *** Error code 1 clearmake: Error: Build script failed for
  • From: linux linux <compile.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Token pasting/concatenation question
  • From: Pavel Dudrenov <dudrenov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Token pasting/concatenation question
  • From: Jon Drukman <jdrukman@xxxxxxxxx>
• problems catching std::runtime_error in a .so built with -fPIC
  • From: Hasan Mahmood <hasan.mahm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What optimizaton flags should i use (g++-4.3.3,Linux,Core2Duo)?
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: building non-shared dynamic binaries on x86-64 linux-elf
  • From: Mathieu Lacage <mathieu.lacage@xxxxxxxxx>
• Urgent Question regarding GCOV
  • From: Jayashree Ramani <rjayashree@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: building non-shared dynamic binaries on x86-64 linux-elf
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: building non-shared dynamic binaries on x86-64 linux-elf
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc -march=nocona -mtune=nocona --help=target
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: building non-shared dynamic binaries on x86-64 linux-elf
  • From: Mathieu Lacage <mathieu.lacage@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: QUery regarding target macros ELIMINABLE_REGS and CAN_ELIMINATE.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc -march=nocona -mtune=nocona --help=target
  • From: Oleg Kravchenko <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc -march=nocona -mtune=nocona --help=target
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.4.0-RC bootstrap failed on i686-pc-solaris2.10
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: QUery regarding target macros ELIMINABLE_REGS and CAN_ELIMINATE.
  • From: sumanth <sumanth.gundapneni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc -march=nocona -mtune=nocona --help=target
  • From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: building non-shared dynamic binaries on x86-64 linux-elf
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc -march=nocona -mtune=nocona --help=target
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.4.0-RC bootstrap failed on i686-pc-solaris2.10
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: QUery regarding target macros ELIMINABLE_REGS and CAN_ELIMINATE.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: building non-shared dynamic binaries on x86-64 linux-elf
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• building non-shared dynamic binaries on x86-64 linux-elf
  • From: Mathieu Lacage <mathieu.lacage@xxxxxxxxx>
• More than 2Gb of static memory with powerpc64
  • From: Tiago Pereira <tiagomdp@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc -march=nocona -mtune=nocona --help=target
  • From: Oleg Kravchenko <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
• 4.4.0-RC bootstrap failed on i686-pc-solaris2.10
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: QUery regarding target macros ELIMINABLE_REGS and CAN_ELIMINATE.
  • From: "venkat" <venkat@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: QUery regarding target macros ELIMINABLE_REGS and CAN_ELIMINATE.
  • From: sumanth <sumanth.gundapneni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: QUery regarding target macros ELIMINABLE_REGS and CAN_ELIMINATE.
  • From: "venkat" <venkat@xxxxxxxxx>
• QUery regarding target macros ELIMINABLE_REGS and CAN_ELIMINATE.
  • From: sumanth <sumanth.gundapneni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: SEH again
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Mixing C and Fortran90 with GNU compilers: problems !
  • From: Sébastien Le Roux <s.le-roux@xxxxxxxxx>
• SEH again
  • From: "Vincent R." <forumer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling 4.3.3 on Tru64 V5.1b
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can I build gcc 4.2.4 for 64 bit Intel Solaris 10 on a 64 bit Linux machine?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems with compiling with gcc-4.3.2: no matching function/candidates are
  • From: Axel Freyn <axel-freyn@xxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling 4.3.3 on Tru64 V5.1b
  • From: Didier Godefroy <dg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Problems with compiling with gcc-4.3.2: no matching function/candidates are
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Problems with compiling with gcc-4.3.2: no matching function/candidates are
  • From: Miguel Lordelo <miguellordelo@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling 4.3.3 on Tru64 V5.1b
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: memory addressed by memory, error
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem linking to wrong class
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling 4.3.3 on Tru64 V5.1b
  • From: Didier Godefroy <dg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem linking to wrong class
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Problem linking to wrong class
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling 4.3.3 on Tru64 V5.1b
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can I build gcc 4.2.4 for 64 bit Intel Solaris 10 on a 64 bit Linux machine?
  • From: <randux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem linking to wrong class
  • From: Brian Peschel <brianp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling GCC with plug-in support
  • From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem linking to wrong class
  • From: Brian Peschel <brianp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can I build gcc 4.2.4 for 64 bit Intel Solaris 10 on a 64 bit Linux machine?
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Compiling 4.3.3 on Tru64 V5.1b
  • From: Didier Godefroy <dg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can I build gcc 4.2.4 for 64 bit Intel Solaris 10 on a 64 bit Linux machine?
  • From: <randux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem linking to wrong class
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• memory addressed by memory, error
  • From: Florent DEFAY <spira.inhabitant@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Aligning on some odd address?
  • From: Philipp Marek <philipp.marek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What optimizaton flags should i use (g++-4.3.3,Linux,Core2Duo)?
  • From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• How does gcc compile source code just like *(ptr base + offset) ?
  • From: 房陈 <fancyfly08@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What optimizaton flags should i use (g++-4.3.3,Linux,Core2Duo)?
  • From: "Martin Ettl" <ettl.martin@xxxxxx>
• Re: Problem linking to wrong class
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Compiling GCC with plug-in support
  • From: Aravinda <aravindakidambi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: equivalent of LD_LIBRARY_PATH to specify header file locations
  • From: kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem linking to wrong class
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: equivalent of LD_LIBRARY_PATH to specify header file locations
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What optimizaton flags should i use (g++-4.3.3,Linux,Core2Duo)?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cross compiler problem: cannot find crt1.o
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can I build gcc 4.2.4 for 64 bit Intel Solaris 10 on a 64 bit Linux machine?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem linking to wrong class
  • From: Brian Peschel <brianp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc: "decContext.c:38:43: error: string.h: No such file or directory"
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem linking to wrong class
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Problem linking to wrong class
  • From: Brian Peschel <brianp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• equivalent of LD_LIBRARY_PATH to specify header file locations
  • From: kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Aligning on some odd address?
  • From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Aligning on some odd address?
  • From: Philipp Marek <philipp.marek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What optimizaton flags should i use (g++-4.3.3,Linux,Core2Duo)?
  • From: Matthew Lai <cyberfish@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What optimizaton flags should i use (g++-4.3.3,Linux,Core2Duo)?
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• What optimizaton flags should i use (g++-4.3.3,Linux,Core2Duo)?
  • From: "Martin Ettl" <ettl.martin@xxxxxx>
• Cross compiler problem: cannot find crt1.o
  • From: Vincent De Groote <list.encelade@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++0x strongly typed enums
  • From: Chris Spencer <spencercw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++0x strongly typed enums
  • From: "Jay I." <jay.27182818@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can I build gcc 4.2.4 for 64 bit Intel Solaris 10 on a 64 bit Linux machine?
  • From: <randux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can I build gcc 4.2.4 for 64 bit Intel Solaris 10 on a 64 bit Linux machine?
  • From: <randux@xxxxxxxxx>
• C++0x strongly typed enums
  • From: Chris Spencer <spencercw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: symbols not resolved... symbols not generated?
  • From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error in dlopen()
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• error in dlopen()
  • From: ranjith kumar <ranjithproxy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Building gcc: "decContext.c:38:43: error: string.h: No such file or directory"
  • From: Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: can someone give me help on translating GNU C extensions to Chinese?
  • From: "mildsim" <whcui1987@xxxxxxxxx>
• configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: symbols not resolved... symbols not generated?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ld: error no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• symbols not resolved... symbols not generated?
  • From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ld: error no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.
  • From: LinuxUser9 <bvrit_abc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ld: error no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: invalid cast of an rvalue expression
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: can someone give me help on translating GNU C extensions to Chinese?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• ld: error no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.
  • From: LinuxUser9 <bvrit_abc@xxxxxxxxx>
• invalid cast of an rvalue expression
  • From: adam99 <adamquestion@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: std::thread segfault
  • From: Matthew Lai <cyberfish@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• can someone give me help on translating GNU C extensions to Chinese?
  • From: "mildsim" <whcui1987@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Aligning on some odd address?
  • From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reload pass ignores constraints. Why?
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: supporting multiple versions of GCC with a single shared object release?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can I build gcc 4.2.4 for 64 bit Intel Solaris 10 on a 64 bit Linux machine?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: query -gcc compiler for MIPS 24 KEc
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: supporting multiple versions of GCC with a single shared object release?
  • From: mario guerra <emailformario@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can I build gcc 4.2.4 for 64 bit Intel Solaris 10 on a 64 bit Linux machine?
  • From: kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@xxxxxxxxx>
• Can I build gcc 4.2.4 for 64 bit Intel Solaris 10 on a 64 bit Linux machine?
  • From: <randux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: std::thread segfault
  • From: Timothy Brownawell <tbrownaw@xxxxxxxxx>
• query -gcc compiler for MIPS 24 KEc
  • From: manjunatha srinivasan <manjunatha.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Aligning on some odd address?
  • From: Philipp Marek <philipp.marek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error building on OS X
  • From: Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request for subscription.
  • From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: symbol lookup error: undefined symbol
  • From: Andi Hellmund <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request for subscription.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: PowerPc architecture and VLE code
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: symbol lookup error: undefined symbol
  • From: Andi Hellmund <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: supporting multiple versions of GCC with a single shared object release?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Aligning on some odd address?
  • From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Aligning on some odd address?
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Request for subscription.
  • From: that bbgun <bbgunthat@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error building on OS X
  • From: dan hitt <dan.hitt@xxxxxxxxx>
• PowerPc architecture and VLE code
  • From: Rosario M <rosariomartorana@xxxxxxxxx>
• Regarding environment variable GCOV_PREFIX
  • From: vrukesh panse <vrukesh.panse@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Aligning on some odd address?
  • From: Philipp Marek <philipp.marek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Aligning on some odd address?
  • From: Fabian Cenedese <Cenedese@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Aligning on some odd address?
  • From: Fabian Cenedese <Cenedese@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error building on OS X
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Aligning on some odd address?
  • From: Philipp Marek <philipp.marek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Error building on OS X
  • From: Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reload pass ignores constraints. Why?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: supporting multiple versions of GCC with a single shared object release?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Retrieve label name
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: supporting multiple versions of GCC with a single shared object release?
  • From: mario guerra <emailformario@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: supporting multiple versions of GCC with a single shared object release?
  • From: mario guerra <emailformario@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reload pass ignores constraints. Why?
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Retrieve label name
  • From: "Vincent R." <forumer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 16-bit compiler
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Retrieve label name
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C thread local storage support
  • From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C thread local storage support
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: supporting multiple versions of GCC with a single shared object release?
  • From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• 16-bit compiler
  • From: Shayne Rich <spectreeng@xxxxxxxxx>
• Retrieve label name
  • From: "Vincent R." <forumer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Shared library linking to Static library
  • From: Roopa V <roopa.v1@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reload pass ignores constraints. Why?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reload pass ignores constraints. Why?
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• C thread local storage support
  • From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Weird assembler error
  • From: "Vincent R." <forumer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Shared library linking to Static library
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pthread - Segmentation fault
  • From: Nicholas Sherlock <n.sherlock@xxxxxxxxx>
• pthread - Segmentation fault
  • From: gopi bhimavarapu <gopimallikharjun@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Shared library linking to Static library
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Shared library linking to Static library
  • From: Roopa V <roopa.v1@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: supporting multiple versions of GCC with a single shared object release?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: supporting multiple versions of GCC with a single shared object release?
  • From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• supporting multiple versions of GCC with a single shared object release?
  • From: mario guerra <emailformario@xxxxxxxxx>
• std::thread segfault
  • From: Matthew Lai <cyberfish@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reload pass ignores constraints. Why?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC v4.4.0 Platform Support and Backwards Compatibility
  • From: "Myers Andrew NGA-AES USA CTR" <Andrew.Myers.ctr@xxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC v4.4.0 Platform Support and Backwards Compatibility
  • From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reload pass ignores constraints. Why?
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: check that a member function really operates on an object of the expected type
  • From: Erik <esigra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: check that a member function really operates on an object of the expected type
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC v4.4.0 Platform Support and Backwards Compatibility
  • From: "Myers Andrew NGA-AES USA CTR" <Andrew.Myers.ctr@xxxxxxx>
• Problem Building libiberty Under Cygwin
  • From: "John Burling" <john@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC v4.4.0 Platform Support and Backwards Compatibility
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: check that a member function really operates on an object of the expected type
  • From: Erik <esigra@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC v4.4.0 Platform Support and Backwards Compatibility
  • From: "Myers Andrew NGA-AES USA CTR" <Andrew.Myers.ctr@xxxxxxx>
• GCC v4.4.0 Platform Support and Backwards Compatibility
  • From: "Myers Andrew NGA-AES USA CTR" <Andrew.Myers.ctr@xxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC v4.4.0 Platform Support and Backwards Compatibility
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Mixing C and Fortran90 with GNU compilers: problems !
  • From: Sébastien Le Roux <s.le-roux@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC v4.4.0 Platform Support and Backwards Compatibility
  • From: "Myers Andrew NGA-AES USA CTR" <Andrew.Myers.ctr@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Shared library linking to Static library
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reload pass ignores constraints. Why?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: check that a member function really operates on an object of the expected type
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Statically linked shared library
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Shared library linking to Static library
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Shared library linking to Static library
  • From: Roopa V <roopa.v1@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Statically linked shared library
  • From: Kolesar <asim.husanovic@xxxxxxxxx>
• Reload pass ignores constraints. Why?
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• check that a member function really operates on an object of the expected type
  • From: Erik <esigra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: specify default options for gcc
  • From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• specify default options for gcc
  • From: kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Questions about the SSA reversion for formal parameters
  • From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: The default C++ headers install place
  • From: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: The default C++ headers install place
  • From: Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -ansi flag slows down fma() operation
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• g++ 4.x.x chokes when using -fprofile-arcs
  • From: nads <salehi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: symbol lookup error: undefined symbol
  • From: Germán Diago <germandiago@xxxxxxxxx>
• -ansi flag slows down fma() operation
  • From: "Martin Ettl" <ettl.martin@xxxxxx>
• symbol lookup error: undefined symbol
  • From: Germán Diago <germandiago@xxxxxxxxx>
• Questions about the SSA reversion for formal parameters
  • From: QiangHuang <qianghuang87@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Extra 8 bytes on stack in gcc 4.3 (64-bit)
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: Re: fma operation::Result
  • From: "Martin Ettl" <ettl.martin@xxxxxx>
• Running the gcc-4.3.3 testsuite
  • From: Kristis Makris <kristis.makris@xxxxxxx>
• merge gcc builds?
  • From: Mike Watters <valholla75@xxxxxxxxx>
• fma operation
  • From: "Martin Ettl" <ettl.martin@xxxxxx>
• RE: Extra 8 bytes on stack in gcc 4.3 (64-bit)
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to generate a PC- relative load instruction.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to generate a PC- relative load instruction.
  • From: sumanth <sumanth.gundapneni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Extra 8 bytes on stack in gcc 4.3 (64-bit)
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Extra 8 bytes on stack in gcc 4.3 (64-bit)
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alpha cross-compiler
  • From: Niran Soundararajan <soundara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Alpha cross-compiler
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• getting the program counter from sparc64 for gcc/glibc
  • From: Mark Farnell <mark.farnell@xxxxxxxxx>
• Alpha cross-compiler
  • From: Niran Soundararajan <soundara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to generate a PC- relative load instruction.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How to generate a PC- relative load instruction.
  • From: sumanth <sumanth.gundapneni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• ICE in final make of gcc-4.5-20090327
  • From: suma sharma <sumasamyukta@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: arm inline assembly constraint for coprocessor registers
  • From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@xxxxxxx>
• Re: tree browser
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• tree browser
  • From: Allen Jackson <jackalle@xxxxxxx>
• Re: arm inline assembly constraint for coprocessor registers
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC options for Intel Atom processors
  • From: Tim Prince <TimothyPrince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• arm inline assembly constraint for coprocessor registers
  • From: John Breitenbach <breiten@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'
  • From: "Riccardo FABBRIS" <riccardo.fabbris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'" on 64bit boxes
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: return address in __cyg_profile_func_exit
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'" on 64bit boxes
  • From: dan hitt <dan.hitt@xxxxxxxxx>
• Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'" on 64bit boxes
  • From: "Riccardo FABBRIS" <riccardo.fabbris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• return address in __cyg_profile_func_exit
  • From: Laurent Burgy <laurent.burgy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC options for Intel Atom processors
  • From: Morgan Wesström <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reg GCC macros for exception handling.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: different friend functions behaviour
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Reg GCC macros for exception handling.
  • From: "venkat" <venkat@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC options for Intel Atom processors
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC options for Intel Atom processors
  • From: Morgan Wesström <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ICE with crx-elf-gcc 4.5.0 20090407
  • From: "M R Swami Reddy" <MR.Swami.Reddy@xxxxxxx>
• Re: different friend functions behaviour
  • From: Fabio Tesser <fabio.tesser@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help with compiling GCC Extension module
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: relocation truncated to fit: R_SPARC_DISP32 .gnu.linkonce.t._ZNSt6vectorISsSaISsEEC1Ev
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help with compiling GCC Extension module
  • From: Aravinda <aravindakidambi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: relocation truncated to fit: R_SPARC_DISP32 .gnu.linkonce.t._ZNSt6vectorISsSaISsEEC1Ev
  • From: kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: different friend functions behaviour
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: relocation truncated to fit: R_SPARC_DISP32 .gnu.linkonce.t._ZNSt6vectorISsSaISsEEC1Ev
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: relocation truncated to fit: R_SPARC_DISP32 .gnu.linkonce.t._ZNSt6vectorISsSaISsEEC1Ev
  • From: kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@xxxxxxxxx>
• different friend functions behaviour
  • From: Fabio Tesser <fabio.tesser@xxxxxxxxx>