Re: ok to add -fPIC to non shared library?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Tim Pushor <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ok to add -fPIC to non shared library?
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 23:39:35 -0700
Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4A15A142.6060008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Tim Pushor's message of "Thu\, 21 May 2009 12\:45\:22 -0600")
References: <4A15A142.6060008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)

Tim Pushor <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I'll cut to the chase - is it ok to include -fPIC compiling C code to
> be included in a static library?

Yes.

However, the resulting executable will run slightly slower.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ok to add -fPIC to non shared library?
  - From: Tim Pushor

References:
- ok to add -fPIC to non shared library?
  - From: Tim Pushor

Prev by Date: Re: 32-bit libraries in 64-bit build.
Next by Date: Re: structure packing
Previous by thread: ok to add -fPIC to non shared library?
Next by thread: Re: ok to add -fPIC to non shared library?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux