Ian Lance Taylor writes: > Thanks for investigating this. It sounds to me like you are saying that > gcc/configure.ac is incorrect in assuming that the i686-pc-solaris2.10 > linker always supports hidden symbols. If that is correct, then it > seems like a bug report would be appropriate. I could just reproduce the problem on mainline with a C-only build. I've got to further investigate what's going on here. I'm pretty sure the linker isn't the culprit, though: before I made the change, I verified with the Sun linker maintainers that .hidden support had been added to ld back in Solaris 9 days, and since there is only one ld, this cannot be the difference between the i386 (default) and i686 builds. This make take a few days, though. Thanks for the report. Rainer ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
