Re: instruction ordering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: instruction ordering
From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 07:50:02 -0700
Cc: "marian@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <marian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, GCC-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <01BB6C05-3F5C-4350-84F4-580492DD5D19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Segher,

> You mean -mcpu= .

I thought -mcpu was a deprecated synonym for -mtune.

Whereas -march implies -mtune, but is not a synonym for -mtune.

My understanding may be out of date.

Sincerely,
--Eljay

Follow-Ups:
- Re: instruction ordering
  - From: John (Eljay) Love-Jensen
- Re: instruction ordering
  - From: Tim Prince

References:
- Re: instruction ordering
  - From: Segher Boessenkool

Prev by Date: Re: instruction ordering
Next by Date: gcc able to output identifiers?
Previous by thread: Re: instruction ordering
Next by thread: Re: instruction ordering
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux