Re: ok to add -fPIC to non shared library?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Tim Pushor <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ok to add -fPIC to non shared library?
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 11:14:45 -0700
Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4A1AA42C.7010005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Tim Pushor's message of "Mon\, 25 May 2009 07\:59\:08 -0600")
References: <4A15A142.6060008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <m3ljopskt4.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <4A1AA42C.7010005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)

Tim Pushor <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> If you don't mind explaining a bit further, why exactly will it be slower?

http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/41

Ian

References:
- ok to add -fPIC to non shared library?
  - From: Tim Pushor
- Re: ok to add -fPIC to non shared library?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: ok to add -fPIC to non shared library?
  - From: Tim Pushor

Prev by Date: Re: ok to add -fPIC to non shared library?
Next by Date: how to compile GCC without "CLooG" ?
Previous by thread: Re: ok to add -fPIC to non shared library?
Next by thread: warning: '0' flag used with '%p' printf format
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux