Ian Lance Taylor skrev: > If you are instead holding a reference to a partially but not completely > destroyed object, then I agree that dynamic_cast can work correctly. > However, I personally don't see a sufficient reason to add yet another > compiler option to support an arguably broken programming style. > The purpose of the compiler option is certainly not to support a broken programming style, but to detect it! (I recently fixed 2 such bugs in a software with over 100 000 lines of C++ and would appreciate some help to see if there are more of them.)
