Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Maik Beckmann" <beckmann.maik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:49:14 -0500
Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200806260153.29971.beckmann.maik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200806260153.29971.beckmann.maik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Maik Beckmann
<beckmann.maik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 25 Juni 2008 20:47:49 schrieb John Love-Jensen:
>> Hi Maik,

I just noticed Maik's gcc-4.3.1 was built under the gcc-4.3.1 source
tree (disgregarding gcc instructions).  Could that be part of the
problem?

-Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
  - From: Maik Beckmann

References:
- Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
  - From: Maik Beckmann

Prev by Date: Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
Next by Date: Re: error: array subscript is not an integer
Previous by thread: Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
Next by thread: Re: [gcc-4.3.1][c++] weird segfault with -O3 in constructor of a global object
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux