RE: STL without libstdc++

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks to all who answered.  Looking again at my own object code, whether using the STL introduces dependencies to libstdc++ seems to depend strongly on which features you use - some only depend on symbols which are also found in libsupc++.a, others have real dependencies - e.g. map depends on RB tree code in libstdc++, and something in my code (haven't checked what yet) depends on bad_alloc.  I also have a feeling though (which may or not be correct) that some templates are assumed to be instantiated in libstdc++, and that g++ will not always instantiate them when it finds them in .cc files.
_________________________________________________________________
Explore the seven wonders of the world
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+world&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux