2008/6/27 Eus <eus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Yes, it is intended. But, neither the doc nor GCC has a bug. > Why? Because the goto operator can be considered as the following function: > void goto(const void *ptr); Right. This in retrospect is obvious. > I guess Intel folks walked the wrong path of not knowing that `const void *' is the superset of `void *'. Well, the doc can be read as impling goto(void *ptr). In any case, I will file a bug for ICC. Regards, Igor
