Hi all, Andrew Haley a écrit :
True. Either way, a test case will tell us. Speculation is pointless; let's see the code.
While trying to slim down my current code to a comprehensive test-case, I found out that my original bug can also be "fixed" by moving the "utils_atom_get_property" function inside the same source file as the one calling it.
I made a dozen git branches in my code to test various ways of building my code : static lib + program_LDFLAGS, static lib + program_LDADD, libtool helper lib + program_LDADD, one big executable. All of them fail identically.
Only moving the actual function code to the calling source file solves the bug.
So, would that make it a linker bug? Are there ways to make sure that gcc is not part of the problem?
Thanks to all of you for your answers, they're greatly appreciated :) -- Rémi Cardona LRI, INRIA remi.cardona@xxxxxx remi@xxxxxxxxxx
