RE: Assembly generation chnages between compiler versions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andrew,

I don't have any thing which gives me the set of changes made from 295 to
345, I am asking whether you have any.

Sharath.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Haley [mailto:aph@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 4:34 PM
> To: shamanju@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Assembly generation chnages between compiler versions
> 
> Sharath Manjunatha wrote:
> 
> >> The compiler has been substantially rewritten, with new 
> optimization 
> >> and code generation strategies.
> > 
> > Ok. I do see some changes in the end of function marker in the 
> > assembly output, between 2.95 and 3.4 compiler. The 2.95 
> compiler was 
> > using .Lef whereas 3.4 will use .-<function name>. Why this 
> has been 
> > changed, do you have any pointer which says about the major changes 
> > from 2.95 to 3.4 GCC compiler .
> 
> Which part of "substantially rewritten" do you find hard to 
> understand?
> 
> Andrew.
> 


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux