Re: problem with symlinks during libstdc++ build (was: gcc-help Digest 18 Jun 2008 01:13:58 -0000 Issue 2753)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Bob,

* Bob Walters wrote on Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 07:05:05AM CEST:
> On Jun 17, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
>>> It looks as if the "($LN_S) $? ." command is failing.
>>
>> Can you show how exactly they fail?  Remove the @ preceding the
>> commands and the 2>/dev/null to see what happens, and post the output
>> of the failure, please.
>
> I removed the two bits/gslice links, and the stamp-bits file as an  
> experiment.

>  Switched back to the std Makefile (with $?)
>
> make showed:
>
> mkdir -p ./bits
> cd ./bits && ln -s /Users/bobw/Desktop/gcc.svn/gcc/libstdc++-v3/ 
> include/bits/basic_string.h /Users/bobw/Desktop/gcc.svn/gcc/libstdc++- 
> v3/include/bits/cpp_type_traits.h /Users/bobw/Desktop/gcc.svn/gcc/ 
> libstdc++-v3/include/bits/deque.tcc /Users/bobw/Desktop/gcc.svn/gcc/ 
> libstdc++-v3/include/bits/fstream.tcc /Users/bobw/Desktop/gcc.svn/gcc/ 
> libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_deque.h /Users/bobw/Desktop/gcc.svn/gcc/ 
[...]
> libstdc++-v3/include/bits/vector.tcc .
> ln: ./basic_string.h: File exists
[...]
> make: [stamp-bits] Error 1 (ignored)
>
> Everything above looks right, except that the two gslice headers are not 
> in $? argument list, as you can see.  I confirmed that they are in  
> ${bits_headers}, and the files exist in the source dirs.   Changing the 
> $? argument in the make to ${bit_headers} results in a much longer  
> command containing all the source files in ${bit_headers} producing the 
> correct links.

That's weird, though.  $? lists all prerequisites that are newer than
the target, in this case stamp-bits.  If the target does not exist, $?
should list all prerequisites.

Please check whether your Apple-built make 3.81 has patches compared to
upstream.  FWIW, I tried 3.79, 3.79.1, 3.80, and 3.81, on
i686-pc-linux-gnu, and all of them worked with the experiment you
described above.  Done to exclude that this bug which looks related:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?16051> isn't the cause.

Does make perchance find a stray stamp-bits file in a VPATH search (that
may come from, say, an earlier, non-VPATH build)?  You can use
  make -d stamp-bits

in order to find out.

Thanks,
Ralf

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux