On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 9:38 PM, James Gregory <james.jrg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't understand assembler, but Actually it is clearly still C++ not assembler, I meant "I don't understand the resulting lower level code". James
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 9:38 PM, James Gregory <james.jrg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't understand assembler, but Actually it is clearly still C++ not assembler, I meant "I don't understand the resulting lower level code". James