Linux RAID Storage

• Date Index

• Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array, (continued)
  • Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array, NeilBrown
    • Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array, Xavier Brochard
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array, Xavier Brochard
  • Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array, Xavier Brochard
  • Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array, Xavier Brochard
    • Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array, Roberto Spadim
      • Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array, Xavier Brochard
• [PATCH] platform_intel: support EFI SCU OEM variable, Labun, Marcin
  • Re: [PATCH] platform_intel: support EFI SCU OEM variable, NeilBrown
• i made sh*t can anyone help!?, Roberto Spadim
  • Re: i made sh*t can anyone help!?, Mathias Burén
    • Re: i made sh*t can anyone help!?, Roberto Spadim
      • Re: i made sh*t can anyone help!?, Roberto Spadim
        • Re: i made sh*t can anyone help!?, Roberto Spadim
          • Re: i made sh*t can anyone help!?, Roberto Spadim
            • Re: i made sh*t can anyone help!?, Roberto Spadim
              • Re: i made sh*t can anyone help!?, Roberto Spadim
                • Re: i made sh*t can anyone help!?, Roberto Spadim
• [PATCH] FIX: Do not count as backup devices, spare disks used for reshape, Adam Kwolek
  • Re: [PATCH] FIX: Do not count as backup devices, spare disks used for reshape, NeilBrown
    • RE: [PATCH] FIX: Do not count as backup devices, spare disks used for reshape, Kwolek, Adam
      • Re: [PATCH] FIX: Do not count as backup devices, spare disks used for reshape, NeilBrown
• [PATCH] imsm: FIX: indicate that metadada has to be written, Adam Kwolek
  • Re: [PATCH] imsm: FIX: indicate that metadada has to be written, NeilBrown
• [PATCH] FIX: Add spare throws exception (v2), Adam Kwolek
  • Re: [PATCH] FIX: Add spare throws exception (v2), NeilBrown
• [PATCH] FIX: Add spare throws exception, Adam Kwolek
• [PATCH 13/36] md,rcu: convert call_rcu(free_conf) to kfree_rcu(), Lai Jiangshan
• MD without LVM : should I reinstall ?, Thomas Carrié
  • Re: MD without LVM : should I reinstall ?, Mathias Burén
    • Re: MD without LVM : should I reinstall ?, Thomas Carrié
      • Re: MD without LVM : should I reinstall ?, Mathias Burén
        • Re: MD without LVM : should I reinstall ?, John Robinson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • MD without LVM : should I reinstall ?, Thomas Carrié
  • MD without LVM : should I reinstall ?, Thomas Carrié
    • Re: MD without LVM : should I reinstall ?, Roberto Spadim
• [PATCH] Retry writing 'inactive' state during stopping array, Krzysztof Wojcik
  • Re: [PATCH] Retry writing 'inactive' state during stopping array, NeilBrown
• How to implement raid1 repair, Jan Schmidt
  • Re: How to implement raid1 repair, Josef Bacik
    • Re: How to implement raid1 repair, Jan Schmidt
  • Re: How to implement raid1 repair, Chris Mason
    • Re: How to implement raid1 repair, Jan Schmidt
  • Message not available
    • Re: How to implement raid1 repair, Jan Schmidt
      • Re: How to implement raid1 repair, Chris Mason
        • Re: How to implement raid1 repair, Andrey Kuzmin
• inactive raid after kernel 2.6.32 update, Xavier Brochard
• [PATCH 04/13] dm: use list_move() instead of list_del()/list_add() combination, Kirill A. Shutemov
• md not flushing some pages, Alexander Dorokhine
• [PATCH 0/4] Raid0 metadata cannot be recognized, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 1/4] FIX: Ping monitor when mdmon is running only, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 2/4] FIX: Write metadata when mdmon is not running, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 4/4] FIX: ping_monitor() usage causes memory leaks, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 3/4] FIX: Handle has to be closed, Adam Kwolek
  • Re: [PATCH 0/4] Raid0 metadata cannot be recognized, NeilBrown
    • RE: [PATCH 0/4] Raid0 metadata cannot be recognized, Kwolek, Adam
• [PATCH] Update documentation for sync_min and sync_max entries, CoolCold
  • Re: [PATCH] Update documentation for sync_min and sync_max entries, NeilBrown
  • Re: [PATCH] Update documentation for sync_min and sync_max entries, CoolCold
    • Re: [PATCH] Update documentation for sync_min and sync_max entries, NeilBrown
• Doing 'echo repair > /sys/devices/virtual/block/md?/md/sync_action' does not result in mismatch_cnt of 0 on RAID-6?, Bas van Schaik
  • Re: Doing 'echo repair > /sys/devices/virtual/block/md?/md/sync_action' does not result in mismatch_cnt of 0 on RAID-6?, Robin Hill
    • Re: Doing 'echo repair > /sys/devices/virtual/block/md?/md/sync_action' does not result in mismatch_cnt of 0 on RAID-6?, Bas van Schaik
      • Re: Doing 'echo repair > /sys/devices/virtual/block/md?/md/sync_action' does not result in mismatch_cnt of 0 on RAID-6?, Robin Hill
        • Re: Doing 'echo repair > /sys/devices/virtual/block/md?/md/sync_action' does not result in mismatch_cnt of 0 on RAID-6?, Bas van Schaik
          • Re: Doing 'echo repair > /sys/devices/virtual/block/md?/md/sync_action' does not result in mismatch_cnt of 0 on RAID-6?, Rory Jaffe
• [PATCH 0/3] UT and error case changes, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 1/3] imsm: FIX: existing backup file fails unit tests, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 2/3] External metadata has to be restored to initial state in error case, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 3/3] imsm: Add metadata abort changes handler template, Adam Kwolek
  • Re: [PATCH 0/3] UT and error case changes, NeilBrown
    • RE: [PATCH 0/3] UT and error case changes, Kwolek, Adam
      • Re: [PATCH 0/3] UT and error case changes, NeilBrown
      • Something wrong with __prep_thunderdome in super-intel.c, NeilBrown
        • Re: Something wrong with __prep_thunderdome in super-intel.c, Dan Williams
          • RE: Something wrong with __prep_thunderdome in super-intel.c, Kwolek, Adam
            • Re: Something wrong with __prep_thunderdome in super-intel.c, Dan Williams
            • Re: Something wrong with __prep_thunderdome in super-intel.c, NeilBrown
          • Re: Something wrong with __prep_thunderdome in super-intel.c, NeilBrown
            • Re: Something wrong with __prep_thunderdome in super-intel.c, Dan Williams
• Q: imsm rapid recovery volume, Luca Berra
  • Re: Q: imsm rapid recovery volume, Roberto Spadim
    • RE: Q: imsm rapid recovery volume, Jiang, Dave
      • Re: Q: imsm rapid recovery volume, Luca Berra
        • RE: Q: imsm rapid recovery volume, Jiang, Dave
          • Re: Q: imsm rapid recovery volume, Luca Berra
            • Re: Q: imsm rapid recovery volume, NeilBrown
• Raid1 mismatches maybe associated to free space, Asdo
• Removed two drives (still valid and working) from raid-5 and need to add them back in., mtice
  • Re: Removed two drives (still valid and working) from raid-5 and need to add them back in., mtice
    • Re: Removed two drives (still valid and working) from raid-5 and need to add them back in., Phil Turmel
      • Re: Removed two drives (still valid and working) from raid-5 and need to add them back in., mtice
        • Message not available
          • Re: Removed two drives (still valid and working) from raid-5 and need to add them back in., mtice
            • RE: Removed two drives (still valid and working) from raid-5 and need to add them back in., Matthew Tice
• RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system, Rory Jaffe
  • Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system, Mikael Abrahamsson
    • Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system, Phil Turmel
      • Message not available
        • [PATCH] Add more warnings to --grow documentation (was: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system), Phil Turmel
      • Message not available
        • Message not available
          • Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system, Phil Turmel
            • Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system, Rory Jaffe
            • Message not available
              • Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system, Phil Turmel
                • Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system, Rory Jaffe
                  • Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system, Phil Turmel
                    • Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system, Rory Jaffe
                      • Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system, NeilBrown
                        • Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system, Rory Jaffe
• [PATCH] platfrom_intel: find OROM based on Intel AHCI and SAS driver device id, Labun, Marcin
  • Re: [PATCH] platfrom_intel: find OROM based on Intel AHCI and SAS driver device id, NeilBrown
• [PATCH 0/2] Checkpointing fixes, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 1/2] FIX: Last_checkpoint has to be initialized in per disk units, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 2/2] imsm: FIX: Store checkpoint in per disk units, Adam Kwolek
  • Re: [PATCH 0/2] Checkpointing fixes, NeilBrown
• BUG_ON() at shutdown time, Justin Maggard
• [PATCH] FIX: Last checkpoint is not initialized on reshape restart, Adam Kwolek
• Growing a raid array online with different capacity disks, jimbob palmer
  • Re: Growing a raid array online with different capacity disks, Mikael Abrahamsson
    • Re: Growing a raid array online with different capacity disks, jimbob palmer
      • Re: Growing a raid array online with different capacity disks, Roman Mamedov
        • Re: Growing a raid array online with different capacity disks, hansbkk
          • Re: Growing a raid array online with different capacity disks, Drew
• [PATCH] FIX: Unfreeze array on success only, Adam Kwolek
• [PATCH 0/9] Reshape restart from checkpoint, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 1/9] FIX: Load container content for container reshape continuation, Adam Kwolek
    • Re: [PATCH 1/9] FIX: Load container content for container reshape continuation, NeilBrown
  • [PATCH 2/9] FIX: Block reshaped array monitoring, Adam Kwolek
    • Re: [PATCH 2/9] FIX: Block reshaped array monitoring, NeilBrown
  • [PATCH 3/9] FIX: Make expansion counter usable, Adam Kwolek
    • Re: [PATCH 3/9] FIX: Make expansion counter usable, NeilBrown
  • [PATCH 4/9] imsm: FIX: Do not clean checkpoint for active reshape, Adam Kwolek
    • Re: [PATCH 4/9] imsm: FIX: Do not clean checkpoint for active reshape, NeilBrown
  • [PATCH 5/9] FIX: Unfreeze array on success only during reshape continuation, Adam Kwolek
    • Re: [PATCH 5/9] FIX: Unfreeze array on success only during reshape continuation, NeilBrown
  • [PATCH 6/9] FIX: Cannot continue reshape if mdmon is not run, Adam Kwolek
    • Re: [PATCH 6/9] FIX: Cannot continue reshape if mdmon is not run, NeilBrown
  • [PATCH 7/9] FIX: Array cannot be opened for writing on restart, Adam Kwolek
    • Re: [PATCH 7/9] FIX: Array cannot be opened for writing on restart, NeilBrown
  • [PATCH 8/9] FIX: Set 'active' array state before array configuration, Adam Kwolek
    • Re: [PATCH 8/9] FIX: Set 'active' array state before array configuration, NeilBrown
  • [PATCH 9/9] imsm : FIX: Assemble dirty array when reshape is in progress, Adam Kwolek
    • Re: [PATCH 9/9] imsm : FIX: Assemble dirty array when reshape is in progress, NeilBrown
• [PATCH 01/14] probe_roms: allow to probe expansion ROMs using vendor and device id., Labun, Marcin
• [PATCH 00/14] OROM/EFI support for Intel SAS and AHCI controllers in IMSM, Labun, Marcin
  • Re: [PATCH 00/14] OROM/EFI support for Intel SAS and AHCI controllers in IMSM, NeilBrown
• [PATCH 13/14] imsm: introduce SAS controller support in imsm metadata handler, Labun, Marcin
• [PATCH 12/14] imsm: move code for retrieving HBA to a function, Labun, Marcin
• [PATCH 08/14] imsm: do not publish OROM/EFI unsupported arrays, Labun, Marcin
• [PATCH 07/14] imsm: detail_platform_imsm displays AHCI and SAS controller information, Labun, Marcin
• [PATCH 05/14] read platform capabilities from EFI, Labun, Marcin
• [PATCH 04/14] Some guid manipulation utilities has been added., Labun, Marcin
• [PATCH 03/14] update of imsm_orom structure, Labun, Marcin
• [PATCH 02/14] Platform-intel: support for OROM SAS and AHCI controller, Labun, Marcin
  • Re: [PATCH 02/14] Platform-intel: support for OROM SAS and AHCI controller, Dan Williams
• [PATCH 14/14] platform_intel: support for OROM OEM capabilities, Labun, Marcin
• [PATCH 11/14] imsm: verify that component disks are attached to the same type of HBA, Labun, Marcin
• [PATCH 10/14] imsm: add maximum number of disk validation in RAID array, Labun, Marcin
• [PATCH 09/14] imsm: print-out error message when volume validation fails, Labun, Marcin
• [PATCH 06/14] imsm: remove unused parameters in function attach_hba_to_super, Labun, Marcin
• [PATCH 0/5] Make OLCE workeable, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 1/5] fix: array is reassembled inactive if stopped during resync, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 2/5] FIX: Set new raid disks when delta_disks is valid, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 3/5] FIX: Allow for takeover, Adam Kwolek
    • Re: [PATCH 3/5] FIX: Allow for takeover, NeilBrown
  • [PATCH 4/5] FIX: Remove delta_parity concept, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 5/5] FIX: Compute spares_needed basing on metadata info, Adam Kwolek
  • Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make OLCE workeable, NeilBrown
    • RE: [PATCH 0/5] Make OLCE workeable, Kwolek, Adam
      • Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make OLCE workeable, NeilBrown
    • RE: [PATCH 0/5] Make OLCE workeable, Kwolek, Adam
    • RE: [PATCH 0/5] Make OLCE workeable, Kwolek, Adam
• [PATCH 1/2] FIX: During reshape array is in active state, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 2/2] imsm: FIX: Mark checkpoint and array state clean during reshape, Adam Kwolek
• polishing up mdadm manpages: mdassemble(8), mdmon(8), Christoph Anton Mitterer
  • Re: polishing up mdadm manpages: mdassemble(8), mdmon(8), NeilBrown
    • Re: polishing up mdadm manpages: mdassemble(8), mdmon(8), Christoph Anton Mitterer
• [PATCH] fix: generated udev rules does not work due to incorrect line format, Hawrylewicz Czarnowski, Przemyslaw
  • Re: [PATCH] fix: generated udev rules does not work due to incorrect line format, NeilBrown
• RAID6 seemingly shrunk itself after hard power outage and rebuild with replacement disk, Robin H. Johnson
  • Re: RAID6 seemingly shrunk itself after hard power outage and rebuild with replacement disk, Stan Hoeppner
  • Re: RAID6 seemingly shrunk itself after hard power outage and rebuild with replacement disk, Phil Turmel
    • Re: RAID6 seemingly shrunk itself after hard power outage and rebuild with replacement disk, Phil Turmel
    • Re: RAID6 seemingly shrunk itself after hard power outage and rebuild with replacement disk, Robin H. Johnson
• Reshape restart questions., Kwolek, Adam
  • Re: Reshape restart questions., NeilBrown
    • RE: Reshape restart questions., Kwolek, Adam
• ideas - raid write, Roberto Spadim
  • Message not available
    • Re: ideas - raid write, Roberto Spadim
      • Re: ideas - raid write, Roberto Spadim
        • Re: ideas - raid write, Roberto Spadim
          • Message not available
            • Re: ideas - raid write, Roberto Spadim
              • Re: ideas - raid write, Roberto Spadim
• Increasing maxsect of md devices?, Bart Kus
  • Re: Increasing maxsect of md devices?, NeilBrown
    • Re: Increasing maxsect of md devices?, Bart Kus
• [PATCH] Enable error message in case of lack of spares for grow, Krzysztof Wojcik
  • Re: [PATCH] Enable error message in case of lack of spares for grow, NeilBrown
• [PATCH 0/9] Grow_continue() - single array., Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 1/9] FIX: Do not configure and start, already started reshape, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 3/9] imsm: FIX: Return blocks_per unit for general migration, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 4/9] imsm: FIX: After checkpoint mark array have to be clean, Adam Kwolek
    • Re: [PATCH 4/9] imsm: FIX: After checkpoint mark array have to be clean, NeilBrown
      • RE: [PATCH 4/9] imsm: FIX: After checkpoint mark array have to be clean, Kwolek, Adam
        • Re: [PATCH 4/9] imsm: FIX: After checkpoint mark array have to be clean, NeilBrown
          • RE: [PATCH 4/9] imsm: FIX: After checkpoint mark array have to be clean, Kwolek, Adam
  • [PATCH 2/9] FIX: Array during reshape cannot be configured, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 5/9] FIX: Continue reshape in the background, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 6/9] FIX: Verify Backup file name before reshape, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 7/9] FIX: Set 'new' geometry when assembling reshaped array, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 8/9] FIX: Block array monitoring when assembling reshaped array, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 9/9] imsm: FIX: Variables declaration cleanup, Adam Kwolek
  • Re: [PATCH 0/9] Grow_continue() - single array., NeilBrown
    • RE: [PATCH 0/9] Grow_continue() - single array., Kwolek, Adam
• RAID10 Performance, Aaron Sowry
  • Re: RAID10 Performance, Robin Hill
    • Re: RAID10 Performance, Keld Jørn Simonsen
  • Re: RAID10 Performance, Mark Knecht
    • Re: RAID10 Performance, Mathias Burén
  • Re: RAID10 Performance, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RAID10 Performance, Aaron Sowry
    • Re: RAID10 Performance, NeilBrown
  • RAID10 Performance, Adam Goryachev
    • Re: RAID10 Performance, Stan Hoeppner
      • Re: RAID10 Performance, Adam Goryachev
        • Re: RAID10 Performance, Stan Hoeppner
          • Re: RAID10 Performance, Adam Goryachev
            • Re: RAID10 Performance, Stan Hoeppner
              • Re: RAID10 Performance, Adam Goryachev
                • Re: RAID10 Performance, Stan Hoeppner
                  • Re: RAID10 Performance, Roberto Spadim
                  • Re: RAID10 Performance, Adam Goryachev
                    • Re: RAID10 Performance, Stan Hoeppner
    • Re: RAID10 Performance, Phil Turmel
• Failed RAID 6 array advice, jahammonds prost
  • Re: Failed RAID 6 array advice, Mikael Abrahamsson
  • Re: Failed RAID 6 array advice, NeilBrown
• Latency issues with MD-RAID, Jansen, Frank
  • Re: Latency issues with MD-RAID, NeilBrown
    • RE: Latency issues with MD-RAID, Jansen, Frank
• [PATCH 0/7] Grow_continue, use in assembly (cont.), Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 1/7] FIX: Verify Backup file name before reshape, Adam Kwolek
    • Re: [PATCH 1/7] FIX: Verify Backup file name before reshape, NeilBrown
      • RE: [PATCH 1/7] FIX: Verify Backup file name before reshape, Kwolek, Adam
  • [PATCH 2/7] FIX: reshape in md should wait for monitoring process (external metadata), Adam Kwolek
    • Re: [PATCH 2/7] FIX: reshape in md should wait for monitoring process (external metadata), NeilBrown
  • [PATCH 3/7] FIX: configure disks slot for expansion, Adam Kwolek
    • Re: [PATCH 3/7] FIX: configure disks slot for expansion, NeilBrown
      • RE: [PATCH 3/7] FIX: configure disks slot for expansion, Kwolek, Adam
  • [PATCH 4/7] Add block_subarray(), Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 6/7] Continue reshape after assembling array, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 5/7] FIX: Block monitor when starting array with reshape in progress, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 7/7] FIX: array is frozen after reshape, Adam Kwolek
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Grow_continue, use in assembly (cont.), NeilBrown
    • RE: [PATCH 0/7] Grow_continue, use in assembly (cont.), Kwolek, Adam
• Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create, Mike Viau
  • RE: Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create, Mike Viau
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create, Mike Viau
    • RE: Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create, Ken Drummond
      • RE: Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create, Mike Viau
        • RE: Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create, Mike Viau
          • RE: Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create, Ken Drummond
  • RE: Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create, Ken Drummond
    • RE: Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create, Mike Viau
      • Re: Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create, John Robinson
• [PATCH 0/5] Grow_continue() prepare for usage in assembly, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 1/5] FIX: Spelling error in dprintf output, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 2/5] FIX: Pass container name to reshape array for external meta data, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 3/5] FIX: Set readonly state in Grow_continue() when necessary, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 4/5] FIX: Continue reshape in the background, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 5/5] FIX: Do not configure and start, already started reshape, Adam Kwolek
  • Re: [PATCH 0/5] Grow_continue() prepare for usage in assembly, NeilBrown
    • RE: [PATCH 0/5] Grow_continue() prepare for usage in assembly, Kwolek, Adam
    • RE: [PATCH 0/5] Grow_continue() prepare for usage in assembly, Kwolek, Adam
• [PATCH] Warn the user about too small array size, Krzysztof Wojcik
  • RE: [PATCH] Warn the user about too small array size, Wojcik, Krzysztof
    • Re: [PATCH] Warn the user about too small array size, NeilBrown
• OK, Now this is really weird, Leslie Rhorer
  • Re: OK, Now this is really weird, Jeff Woods
    • RE: OK, Now this is really weird, Leslie Rhorer
      • Re: OK, Now this is really weird, Mathias Burén
        • Re: OK, Now this is really weird, NeilBrown
          • RE: OK, Now this is really weird, Leslie Rhorer
            • Re: OK, Now this is really weird, NeilBrown
        • RE: OK, Now this is really weird, Leslie Rhorer
• [PATCH] Partitions could be meaningful on single-drive RAID0, Krzysztof Wojcik
• auto-read-only question, Albert Pauw
  • Re: auto-read-only question, Robin Hill
• [PATCH] FIX: imsm: OROM does not recognize degraded arrays (V2), Krzysztof Wojcik
• stripe cache question, Piergiorgio Sartor
  • Re: stripe cache question, NeilBrown
    • Re: stripe cache question, Piergiorgio Sartor
      • Re: stripe cache question, NeilBrown
        • Re: stripe cache question, Piergiorgio Sartor
        • Re: stripe cache question, Piergiorgio Sartor
• [PATCH] FIX: imsm: OROM does not recognize degraded arrays, Krzysztof Wojcik
  • Re: [PATCH] FIX: imsm: OROM does not recognize degraded arrays, Dan Williams
    • RE: [PATCH] FIX: imsm: OROM does not recognize degraded arrays, Wojcik, Krzysztof
• -Y option patch, Albert Pauw
• Re: [PULL REQUEST] md and related patches for 2.6.38, Linus Torvalds
  • Re: [PULL REQUEST] md and related patches for 2.6.38, NeilBrown
    • Re: [PULL REQUEST] md and related patches for 2.6.38, Linus Torvalds
      • Re: [PULL REQUEST] md and related patches for 2.6.38, NeilBrown
• failed drive in raid 1 array, Roberto Nunnari
  • Re: failed drive in raid 1 array, Roberto Spadim
    • Re: failed drive in raid 1 array, Roberto Nunnari
      • Re: failed drive in raid 1 array, Roberto Spadim
        • Re: failed drive in raid 1 array, Roberto Nunnari
          • Re: failed drive in raid 1 array, Roberto Spadim
            • Re: failed drive in raid 1 array, Roberto Nunnari
              • Re: failed drive in raid 1 array, Iordan Iordanov
                • Re: failed drive in raid 1 array, Roberto Spadim
                  • Re: failed drive in raid 1 array, Iordan Iordanov
                    • Re: failed drive in raid 1 array, Roberto Spadim
    • Re: failed drive in raid 1 array, Albert Pauw
      • Re: failed drive in raid 1 array, Roberto Nunnari
        • Re: failed drive in raid 1 array, Roberto Nunnari
          • Re: failed drive in raid 1 array, Roberto Spadim
• failing a drive while RAID5 is initializing, Iordan Iordanov
  • Re: failing a drive while RAID5 is initializing, Robin Hill
    • Re: failing a drive while RAID5 is initializing, Iordan Iordanov
      • Re: failing a drive while RAID5 is initializing, Robin Hill
• [PATCH 0/4] Prepare assembled array for reshape (expansion), Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 1/4] FIX: disks added beyond array should be counted during reshape, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 2/4] FIX: Prevent reshape auto start during assembly for external metadata, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 3/4] FIX: Block monitor when starting array with reshape in progress, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 4/4] TBD: continue reshape after assembling array, Adam Kwolek
• Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock, Lasse Jensen
  • Re: Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock, Jaap Crezee
  • Message not available
    • Re: Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock, Lasse Jensen
      • Re: Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock, Iordan Iordanov
        • Re: Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock, John Robinson
  • Re: Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock, Lasse Jensen
• Two questions about stripe_cache_size, Patrick J. LoPresti
  • Re: Two questions about stripe_cache_size, NeilBrown
    • Re: Two questions about stripe_cache_size, Roberto Spadim
    • Re: Two questions about stripe_cache_size, Patrick J. LoPresti
      • Re: Two questions about stripe_cache_size, NeilBrown
        • Re: Two questions about stripe_cache_size, Roberto Spadim
        • Re: Two questions about stripe_cache_size, Patrick J. LoPresti
• raid10 - without stripe, Roberto Spadim
  • Re: raid10 - without stripe, NeilBrown
    • Re: raid10 - without stripe, Roberto Spadim
• removing AHCI SATA devices, Simon Mcnair
  • Re: removing AHCI SATA devices, Jeff Garzik
    • Re: removing AHCI SATA devices, Simon McNair
      • Re: removing AHCI SATA devices, hansbkk
      • Re: removing AHCI SATA devices, John Robinson
        • Re: removing AHCI SATA devices, Roberto Spadim
• Combining RAID6 and mdadm RAID10?, hansbkk
• [PATCH 0/3] Continue expansion after reboot, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 1/3] imsm: FIX: initalize reshape progress as it is stored in metatdata, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 2/3] imsm: FIX: Report correct array size during reshape, Adam Kwolek
  • [PATCH 3/3] FIX: Assemble device in reshape state with new disks number, Adam Kwolek
  • Re: [PATCH 0/3] Continue expansion after reboot, NeilBrown
    • RE: [PATCH 0/3] Continue expansion after reboot, Kwolek, Adam
    • RE: [PATCH 0/3] Continue expansion after reboot, Kwolek, Adam
      • Re: [PATCH 0/3] Continue expansion after reboot, NeilBrown
        • RE: [PATCH 0/3] Continue expansion after reboot, Kwolek, Adam
• Possible availability improvement, Michał Sawicz
  • Re: Possible availability improvement, Mikael Abrahamsson
• [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone, Piergiorgio Sartor
  • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone, Piergiorgio Sartor
  • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone, NeilBrown
    • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone, Piergiorgio Sartor
      • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone, NeilBrown
        • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone, Piergiorgio Sartor
          • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone, NeilBrown
            • [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone md device, Piergiorgio Sartor
              • Message not available
                • Message not available
                  • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone md device, Bas van Schaik
                    • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone md device, Piergiorgio Sartor
              • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone md device, NeilBrown
                • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone md device, Piergiorgio Sartor
            • [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone code cleanup, Piergiorgio Sartor
              • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone code cleanup, NeilBrown
                • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone code cleanup, Piergiorgio Sartor
                  • [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone fix component list parsing, Piergiorgio Sartor
                    • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone fix component list parsing, NeilBrown
                  • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone code cleanup, NeilBrown
                • [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone suspend array, Piergiorgio Sartor
                  • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone suspend array, NeilBrown
                    • [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone suspend array V2.0, Piergiorgio Sartor
                      • [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone suspend array V2.0, Piergiorgio Sartor
                        • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone suspend array V2.0, NeilBrown
                          • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone suspend array V2.0, Piergiorgio Sartor
                            • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone suspend array V2.0, Luca Berra
                              • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone suspend array V2.0, Piergiorgio Sartor
                            • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone suspend array V2.0, NeilBrown
                              • [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone man page, Piergiorgio Sartor
                                • Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone man page, NeilBrown
• New machine, new RAID, wrong device name..., Mark Knecht
  • Re: New machine, new RAID, wrong device name..., NeilBrown
    • Re: New machine, new RAID, wrong device name..., Mark Knecht
• [PATCH] set default chunk in validate_geometry, Czarnowska, Anna
  • Re: [PATCH] set default chunk in validate_geometry, NeilBrown
• Likely forced assemby with wrong disk during raid5 grow. Recoverable?, Claude Nobs
  • Re: Likely forced assemby with wrong disk during raid5 grow. Recoverable?, NeilBrown
    • Re: Likely forced assemby with wrong disk during raid5 grow. Recoverable?, Claude Nobs
      • Re: Likely forced assemby with wrong disk during raid5 grow. Recoverable?, Mathias Burén
      • Re: Likely forced assemby with wrong disk during raid5 grow. Recoverable?, NeilBrown
        • Re: Likely forced assemby with wrong disk during raid5 grow. Recoverable?, NeilBrown
        • Re: Likely forced assemby with wrong disk during raid5 grow. Recoverable?, Claude Nobs
          • Re: Likely forced assemby with wrong disk during raid5 grow. Recoverable?, NeilBrown
            • Re: Likely forced assemby with wrong disk during raid5 grow. Recoverable?, Claude Nobs
• Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?, Mathias Burén
  • Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?, Simon McNair
  • Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?, John Robinson
    • Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?, Phil Turmel
      • Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?, John Robinson
      • Message not available
        • Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?, Phil Turmel
          • Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?, John Robinson
      • Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?, Mathias Burén
        • Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?, Phil Turmel
          • Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?, Mathias Burén
            • Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?, Phil Turmel
              • Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?, Mathias Burén
              • Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?, John Robinson
                • Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?, Mathias Burén
          • Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?, Simon Mcnair
• mdadm ddf questions, Albert Pauw
  • Re: mdadm ddf questions, Albert Pauw
    • Re: mdadm ddf questions, NeilBrown
      • Re: mdadm ddf questions, Albert Pauw
        • Re: mdadm ddf questions, NeilBrown
          • More ddf container woes, Albert Pauw
            • Re: More ddf container woes, Albert Pauw
              • Re: More ddf container woes, NeilBrown
                • Re: More ddf container woes, Albert Pauw
                  • Re: More ddf container woes, NeilBrown
                    • Re: More ddf container woes, Albert Pauw
    • Re: mdadm ddf questions, NeilBrown
  • Re: mdadm ddf questions, NeilBrown
    • Re: mdadm ddf questions, Albert Pauw
• External bitmap, questions, Mathias Burén
  • Re: External bitmap, questions, NeilBrown
    • Re: External bitmap, questions, Mathias Burén
      • Re: External bitmap, questions, NeilBrown
        • Re: External bitmap, questions, Mathias Burén
      • Re: External bitmap, questions, Roman Mamedov
        • Re: External bitmap, questions, Mathias Burén
          • Re: External bitmap, questions, Roman Mamedov
• Recovery Optimization?, Jon Forrest
  • Re: Recovery Optimization?, Mathias Burén
  • Re: Recovery Optimization?, NeilBrown
• Raid selection questions (10 vs 6, n2 vs f2) on an 8 drive array, Larry Schwerzler
  • Re: Raid selection questions (10 vs 6, n2 vs f2) on an 8 drive array, Stan Hoeppner
    • Re: Raid selection questions (10 vs 6, n2 vs f2) on an 8 drive array, Keld Jørn Simonsen
      • Re: Raid selection questions (10 vs 6, n2 vs f2) on an 8 drive array, Larry Schwerzler
        • Re: Raid selection questions (10 vs 6, n2 vs f2) on an 8 drive array, Stan Hoeppner
          • Re: Raid selection questions (10 vs 6, n2 vs f2) on an 8 drive array, Simon Mcnair
    • Re: Raid selection questions (10 vs 6, n2 vs f2) on an 8 drive array, Larry Schwerzler
  • Re: Raid selection questions (10 vs 6, n2 vs f2) on an 8 drive array, Joe Landman
    • Re: Raid selection questions (10 vs 6, n2 vs f2) on an 8 drive array, Larry Schwerzler
  • Re: Raid selection questions (10 vs 6, n2 vs f2) on an 8 drive array, NeilBrown
• Removed drive from mdadm raid 5 array after reboot, Mike Viau
  • Re: Removed drive from mdadm raid 5 array after reboot, Michał Sawicz
    • Message not available
      • RE: Removed drive from mdadm raid 5 array after reboot, Mike Viau
• hdparm standby timeout stopped working, Marc Rechté
• mdadm / force parity checking of blocks on all reads?, Steve Costaras
  • Re: mdadm / force parity checking of blocks on all reads?, NeilBrown
    • Re: mdadm / force parity checking of blocks on all reads?, Roberto Spadim
    • Re: mdadm / force parity checking of blocks on all reads?, Steve Costaras
      • Re: mdadm / force parity checking of blocks on all reads?, John Robinson
• [PATCH 2/2] fix: memory leak in Create, Czarnowska, Anna
• [PATCH 1/2] modified message on failure to read metadata in Manage, Czarnowska, Anna
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] modified message on failure to read metadata in Manage, NeilBrown
• raid5/raid6 write performance question, Patrick J. LoPresti
  • Re: raid5/raid6 write performance question, Piergiorgio Sartor
  • Re: raid5/raid6 write performance question, David Brown
• Mixing mdadm versions, hansbkk
  • Re: Mixing mdadm versions, Phil Turmel
    • Re: Mixing mdadm versions, hansbkk
• [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size., NeilBrown
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size., Jeff Moyer
    • RE: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size., Kwolek, Adam
      • Re: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size., NeilBrown
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size., Jeff Moyer
    • Re: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size., NeilBrown
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size., Christoph Hellwig
    • Re: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size., NeilBrown
      • Re: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size., Andrew Patterson
        • Re: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size., NeilBrown
          • Re: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size., Andrew Patterson
            • Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size., James Bottomley
              • Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size., NeilBrown
                • Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size., James Bottomley
                  • Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size., NeilBrown
                    • Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size., Jeff Moyer
                      • Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size., NeilBrown
                        • Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size., Jeff Moyer
• RAID5 won't mount after reducing disks from 8 to 6, Matt Tehonica
  • Re: RAID5 won't mount after reducing disks from 8 to 6, Phil Turmel
    • Re: RAID5 won't mount after reducing disks from 8 to 6, Matt Tehonica
      • Re: RAID5 won't mount after reducing disks from 8 to 6, Phil Turmel
    • Re: RAID5 won't mount after reducing disks from 8 to 6, Keld Jørn Simonsen
    • Re: RAID5 won't mount after reducing disks from 8 to 6, Stan Hoeppner
  • Re: RAID5 won't mount after reducing disks from 8 to 6, NeilBrown
    • Re: RAID5 won't mount after reducing disks from 8 to 6, Matt Tehonica
      • Re: RAID5 won't mount after reducing disks from 8 to 6, NeilBrown
        • Re: RAID5 won't mount after reducing disks from 8 to 6, Matt Tehonica
        • Re: RAID5 won't mount after reducing disks from 8 to 6, Stan Hoeppner
      • Re: RAID5 won't mount after reducing disks from 8 to 6, Joe Landman
• Automate on-going checks?, Mark Knecht
  • Re: Automate on-going checks?, Roberto Spadim
• [PATCH] FIX: Seg Fault in incremental if BBM log detected, Krzysztof Wojcik
  • Re: [PATCH] FIX: Seg Fault in incremental if BBM log detected, NeilBrown
• [PATCH] FIX: sysfs_disk_to_scsi_id() adapted to current sysfs format, Krzysztof Wojcik
  • Re: [PATCH] FIX: sysfs_disk_to_scsi_id() adapted to current sysfs format, NeilBrown
    • RE: [PATCH] FIX: sysfs_disk_to_scsi_id() adapted to current sysfs format, Wojcik, Krzysztof
• Shouldn't --zero-superblock reset the UUID?, hansbkk
  • Re: Shouldn't --zero-superblock reset the UUID?, linbloke
    • Re: Shouldn't --zero-superblock reset the UUID?, NeilBrown
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Shouldn't --zero-superblock reset the UUID?, mirovis
  • Re: Shouldn't --zero-superblock reset the UUID?, mirovis
• md - cache, Roberto Spadim
  • Re: md - cache, Mathias Burén
  • Re: md - cache, Andre Tomt
    • Re: md - cache, Roberto Spadim
• reshape failure, Tobias McNulty
  • Re: reshape failure, NeilBrown
    • Re: reshape failure, Tobias McNulty
      • Re: reshape failure, NeilBrown
        • Re: reshape failure, Tobias McNulty
          • Re: reshape failure, Tobias McNulty
            • Re: reshape failure, NeilBrown
              • Re: reshape failure, Tobias McNulty
              • Message not available
                • Re: reshape failure, NeilBrown
                  • Re: reshape failure, Tobias McNulty
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Reshape Failure, Jason Moss
    • Re: Reshape Failure, Yu Kuai
      • Re: Reshape Failure, Jason Moss
        • Re: Reshape Failure, Yu Kuai
          • Re: Reshape Failure, Jason Moss
            • Re: Reshape Failure, Yu Kuai
              • Re: Reshape Failure, Jason Moss
                • Message not available
                  • Re: Reshape Failure, Jason Moss
                    • Re: Reshape Failure, Yu Kuai
                      • Re: Reshape Failure, Jason Moss
                        • Re: Reshape Failure, Yu Kuai
• Upgrading from RAID 5 to 6 or build native level 6?, Lasse Jensen
  • Re: Upgrading from RAID 5 to 6 or build native level 6?, Beolach
    • Re: Upgrading from RAID 5 to 6 or build native level 6?, Roman Mamedov
• File system corruption during setting new size (native/extarnal metatdat) after expansion, Kwolek, Adam
  • Re: File system corruption during setting new size (native/extarnal metatdat) after expansion, NeilBrown
    • RE: File system corruption during setting new size (native/extarnal metatdat) after expansion, Kwolek, Adam
      • Re: File system corruption during setting new size (native/extarnal metatdat) after expansion, NeilBrown
        • RE: File system corruption during setting new size (native/extarnal metatdat) after expansion, Kwolek, Adam
• md road-map: 2011, NeilBrown
  • Re: md road-map: 2011, Giovanni Tessore
    • Re: md road-map: 2011, Roberto Spadim
      • Re: md road-map: 2011, Robin Hill
        • Re: md road-map: 2011, Roberto Spadim
          • Re: md road-map: 2011, Roberto Spadim
            • Re: md road-map: 2011, NeilBrown
              • Re: md road-map: 2011, Roberto Spadim
  • Re: md road-map: 2011, Joe Landman
    • Re: md road-map: 2011, NeilBrown
      • Re: md road-map: 2011, Roman Mamedov
        • Re: md road-map: 2011, NeilBrown
          • Re: md road-map: 2011, Phil Turmel
        • Re: md road-map: 2011, Joe Landman
  • Re: md road-map: 2011, David Brown
    • Re: md road-map: 2011, NeilBrown
      • Re: md road-map: 2011, David Brown
        • Re: md road-map: 2011, NeilBrown
          • Re: md road-map: 2011, David Brown
            • Re: md road-map: 2011, NeilBrown
            • Re: md road-map: 2011, Keld Jørn Simonsen
              • Re: md road-map: 2011, David Brown
                • Re: md road-map: 2011, Keld Jørn Simonsen
                  • Re: md road-map: 2011, Giovanni Tessore
                    • Re: md road-map: 2011, Keld Jørn Simonsen
                      • Re: md road-map: 2011, Roberto Spadim
                      • Re: md road-map: 2011, Giovanni Tessore
                        • Re: md road-map: 2011, Keld Jørn Simonsen
                          • Re: md road-map: 2011, Roberto Spadim
                          • Re: md road-map: 2011, Giovanni Tessore
                            • Re: md road-map: 2011, Keld Jørn Simonsen
                              • Re: md road-map: 2011, Roberto Spadim
                                • Re: md road-map: 2011, Keld Jørn Simonsen
                                  • Re: md road-map: 2011, Roberto Spadim
  • Re: md road-map: 2011, Joe Landman
    • Re: md road-map: 2011, NeilBrown
  • Re: md road-map: 2011, Phil Turmel
    • Re: md road-map: 2011, NeilBrown
      • Re: md road-map: 2011, Phil Turmel
  • Re: md road-map: 2011, Piergiorgio Sartor
    • Re: md road-map: 2011, NeilBrown
      • Re: md road-map: 2011, Piergiorgio Sartor
      • Re: md road-map: 2011, Phil Turmel
        • Re: md road-map: 2011, NeilBrown
          • Re: md road-map: 2011, Phil Turmel
            • Re: md road-map: 2011, NeilBrown
              • Re: md road-map: 2011, Phil Turmel
              • Re: md road-map: 2011, Mr. James W. Laferriere
                • Re: md road-map: 2011, NeilBrown
            • Re: md road-map: 2011, Piergiorgio Sartor
  • Re: md road-map: 2011, Keld Jørn Simonsen
  • Re: md road-map: 2011, Daniel Reurich
• old filesystem label remaining after partition --add 'ed?, hansbkk
  • Re: old filesystem label remaining after partition --add 'ed?, Phil Turmel
    • Re: old filesystem label remaining after partition --add 'ed?, hansbkk
      • Re: old filesystem label remaining after partition --add 'ed?, Phil Turmel
• help with queue kernel information, Roberto Spadim
  • Re: help with queue kernel information, Roberto Spadim
• Samsung HD204UI (2TB F4EG) disk vs smart, Eyal Lebedinsky
  • Re: Samsung HD204UI (2TB F4EG) disk vs smart, Roman Mamedov
• failed to write superblock errors, and more!, Jon Nelson
  • Re: failed to write superblock errors, and more!, NeilBrown
• physical size of the device inconsistent with superblock, after RAID problems, Gavin Flower
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: physical size of the device inconsistent with superblock, after RAID problems, Gavin Flower
    • Re: physical size of the device inconsistent with superblock, after RAID problems, NeilBrown
  • Re: physical size of the device inconsistent with superblock, after RAID problems, Gavin Flower
• high throughput storage server?, Matt Garman
  • Re: high throughput storage server?, Doug Dumitru
    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Matt Garman
      • Re: high throughput storage server?, hansbkk
      • Re: high throughput storage server?, David Brown
        • Re: high throughput storage server?, Matt Garman
          • Re: high throughput storage server?, David Brown
      • Re: high throughput storage server?, Joe Landman
        • Re: high throughput storage server?, NeilBrown
          • Re: high throughput storage server?, Joe Landman
            • Re: high throughput storage server?, NeilBrown
        • Re: high throughput storage server?, Matt Garman
          • Re: high throughput storage server?, Joe Landman
            • Re: high throughput storage server? GPFS w/ 10GB/s throughput to the rescue, Stan Hoeppner
              • Re: high throughput storage server? GPFS w/ 10GB/s throughput to the rescue, Joe Landman
                • Re: high throughput storage server? GPFS w/ 10GB/s throughput to the rescue, Stan Hoeppner
                  • Re: high throughput storage server? GPFS w/ 10GB/s throughput to the rescue, Matt Garman
      • Re: high throughput storage server?, Ed W
        • Re: high throughput storage server?, Joe Landman
          • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
        • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
        • Re: high throughput storage server?, Matt Garman
          • Re: high throughput storage server?, Joe Landman
            • Re: high throughput storage server?, Roberto Spadim
              • Re: high throughput storage server?, Drew
                • Re: high throughput storage server?, Roberto Spadim
                  • Re: high throughput storage server?, Christoph Hellwig
                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
                      • Re: high throughput storage server?, Christoph Hellwig
                        • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
                          • Re: high throughput storage server?, Christoph Hellwig
                            • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
                              • Re: high throughput storage server?, Roberto Spadim
                              • Re: high throughput storage server?, NeilBrown
                                • Re: high throughput storage server?, Roberto Spadim
                                • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
                                  • Re: high throughput storage server?, NeilBrown
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Roberto Spadim
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Roberto Spadim
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Keld Jørn Simonsen
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Roberto Spadim
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Roberto Spadim
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Roberto Spadim
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Keld Jørn Simonsen
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Robin Hill
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Keld Jørn Simonsen
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Roberto Spadim
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Joe Landman
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Joe Landman
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Christoph Hellwig
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, NeilBrown
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Roberto Spadim
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
                                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Keld Jørn Simonsen
  • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Roberto Spadim
      • Re: high throughput storage server?, Roberto Spadim
        • Re: high throughput storage server?, Matt Garman
          • Re: high throughput storage server?, Zdenek Kaspar
            • Re: high throughput storage server?, Joe Landman
    • Re: high throughput storage server?, David Brown
      • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
        • Re: high throughput storage server?, Keld Jørn Simonsen
          • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
            • Re: high throughput storage server?, Roberto Spadim
              • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
        • Re: high throughput storage server?, David Brown
          • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
            • Re: high throughput storage server?, David Brown
      • Re: high throughput storage server?, Matt Garman
  • Re: high throughput storage server?, Zdenek Kaspar
    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Roberto Spadim
      • Re: high throughput storage server?, Zdenek Kaspar
        • Re: high throughput storage server?, Matt Garman
      • Re: high throughput storage server?, A. Krijgsman
        • Re: high throughput storage server?, Roberto Spadim
  • Re: high throughput storage server?, John Robinson
    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Roberto Spadim
      • Re: high throughput storage server?, Roberto Spadim
    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
      • Re: high throughput storage server?, Joe Landman
        • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
          • Re: high throughput storage server?, Joe Landman
            • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
  • Re: high throughput storage server?, Mattias Wadenstein
    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
      • Re: high throughput storage server?, Mattias Wadenstein
        • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
          • Re: high throughput storage server?, David Brown
            • Re: high throughput storage server?, Mattias Wadenstein
              • Re: high throughput storage server?, David Brown
            • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
              • Re: high throughput storage server?, David Brown
                • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
                  • Re: high throughput storage server?, David Brown
                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, John Robinson
                      • Re: high throughput storage server?, David Brown
                        • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
                          • Re: high throughput storage server?, David Brown
                      • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
                        • Re: high throughput storage server?, John Robinson
                          • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
                    • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner
                      • Re: high throughput storage server?, David Brown
                        • Re: high throughput storage server?, Stan Hoeppner