Re: Raid selection questions (10 vs 6, n2 vs f2) on an 8 drive array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 05:44:24PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Larry Schwerzler put forth on 2/18/2011 2:55 PM:
> 
> > 1. In my research of raid10 I very seldom hear of drive configurations
> > with more drives then 4, are there special considerations with having
> > an 8 drive raid10 array? I understand that I'll be loosing 2TB of
> > space from my current setup, but i'm not too worried about that.
> 
> This is because Linux mdraid is most popular with the hobby crowd, not
> business, and most folks in this segment aren't running more than 4
> drives in a RAID 10.  For business solutions using embedded Linux and
> mdraid, mdraid is typically hidden from the user who isn't going to be
> writing posts on the net about mdraid.  He calls his vendor for support.
>  In a nutshell, that's why you see little or no posts about mdraid 10
> arrays larger than 4 drives.

well on https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Performance
there are several performance reports with 6 or 10 spindles, so there...

For an 8 drive Linux MD raid10 maybe you should consider a motherboard
with 8 sata ports.

Best regards
keld
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux