On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:24:53 +0000 "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've met again array_size change problem. A while ago I've indicated it, during array expansion, file system corruption occurs.
> The previous conclusion was that my tests were wrong (too small arrays, on bigger arrays it seems to be ok),
> I've got now reproduction in our lab on quite big arrays (250G) and on my small test arrays also.
>
> This problem is related to array expansion using native and external metadata.
>
> Problem is that after expansion file system on array is corrupted.
> Operation that corrupts file system is array size change via sysfs (and for native metadata during reshape finalization in md).
> In logs I've got information:
> VFS: busy inodes on changed media or resized disks
>
> My investigation in md goes to block_dev.c/inode.c and flush_disk() (called from check_disk_size_change()).
> I've found above text there (about busy inodes).
> My traces shows that in __invalidate_inodes(), inode->i_count == 2 and it is locked. This makes me to look how invalidate_inodes() is called.
> Before invalidate_inodes() is called, cache is cleared by shrink_dcache_sb().
> If I've commented shrink_dcache_sb() file system seems to be safe. It is the same when invalidate_inodes() is commented (shrink_cache_sb() called only).
> If I've changed functions order (1. invalidate_inodes(), 2. shrink_dcache_sb()) in __invalidate_device() (block_dev.c) there is no corruption also.
> When after shrink_dcache_sb() is called invalidate_inodes() on busy inodes corruption occurs (if it called earlier it doesn't matter).
>
> This problem can be reproduced on mounted arrays only. If array is not mounted, file system corruption disappears.
> This means that whole expansion process is correct.
> In some cases (rarely) inodes on mounted device are not locked and then FS corruption doesn't happened.
>
>
> I'd like to know your opinion.
> Do you think that problem is in releasing cache but not all inodes (busy case), commands order...
> ... or probably changing size on mounted array is a mistake (for current code)?
>
> BR
> Adam
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> My test commands:
>
> #create container
> mdadm -C /dev/md/imsm0 -amd -e imsm -n 3 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sde -R
>
> #create volume
> mdadm -C /dev/md/raid5vol_0 -amd -l 5 --chunk 64 --size 104857 -n 3 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sde -R
> mkfs /dev/md/raid5vol_0
> mount /dev/md/raid5vol_0 /mnt/vol
>
> #copy some files from current directory
> cp * /mnt/vol
>
> #add spare
> mdadm --add /dev/md/imsm0 /dev/sdd
>
> #start reshape
> mdadm --grow /dev/md/imsm0 --raid-devices 4 --backup-file=/backup.bak
Thanks for the script - that makes things a lot easier.
I had to add some "mdadm --wait" commands etc to make it work reliably, but
then I could get it to generate filesystem corruption quite easily.
I also had "mdmon" crashing because imsm_num_data_members got a 'map' of NULL,
and then tried to get_imsm_raid_level on it. Something needs to be fixed
there (I hacked it so that if it got a NULL, it tried again with second_map
== 0, but I don't know if that is right).
The problem seems to be in the VFS/VM layer. I can see two ways to fix it.
I'll see if I can find some who wants to take responsibility and make a
decision.
1/ in invalidate_inodes (in fs/inodes.c), inside the loop, add a clause:
if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY)
continue;
That is what is causing the problem - dirty inodes are being discarded.
2/ in check_disk_size_change (in fs/block_dev.c), replace
flush_disk(bdev);
with
if (disk_size == 0 || bdev_size == 0)
flush_disk(bdev);
because I don't think there is any justification for calling flush_bdev if
we are just changing the size of the disk - though I don't really know why
that is there at all, so it is hard to say for sure. Certainly if
disk_size > bdev_size we shouldn't be calling flush disk.
So I suggest you make one of those changes to continue with your testing, and
I'll try to get something sorted out.
If you could look into the circumstances that might make imsm_num_data_members
get a NULL map, I would appreciate that.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
