Re: high throughput storage server?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



with more network cards = more network gbps
with better (faster) rams = more disks reads
with more raid0/4/5/6 = more speed on disks reads
with more raid1 mirrors = more security
with more sas/sata/raid controllers = more GB/TB on storage
with more anything ~= more money
just know what numbers you want and make it work

2011/2/17 John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 14/02/2011 23:59, Matt Garman wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> The requirement is basically this: around 40 to 50 compute machines
>> act as basically an ad-hoc scientific compute/simulation/analysis
>> cluster.  These machines all need access to a shared 20 TB pool of
>> storage.  Each compute machine has a gigabit network connection, and
>> it's possible that nearly every machine could simultaneously try to
>> access a large (100 to 1000 MB) file in the storage pool.  In other
>> words, a 20 TB file store with bandwidth upwards of 50 Gbps.
>
> I'd recommend you analyse that requirement more closely. Yes, you have 50
> compute machines with GigE connections so it's possible they could all
> demand data from the file store at once, but in actual use, would they?
>
> For example, if these machines were each to demand a 100MB file, how long
> would they spend computing their results from it? If it's only 1 second,
> then you would indeed need an aggregate bandwidth of 50Gbps[1]. If it's 20
> seconds processing, your filer only needs an aggregate bandwidth of 2.5Gbps.
>
> So I'd recommend you work out first how much data the compute machines can
> actually chew through and work up from there, rather than what their network
> connections could stream through and work down.
>
> Cheers,
>
> John.
>
> [1] I'm assuming the compute nodes are fetching the data for the next
> compute cycle while they're working on this one; if they're not you're
> likely making unnecessary demands on your filer while leaving your compute
> nodes idle.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>



-- 
Roberto Spadim
Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux