> -----Original Message----- > From: NeilBrown [mailto:neilb@xxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 2:31 AM > To: Kwolek, Adam > Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Williams, Dan J; Ciechanowski, Ed; > Neubauer, Wojciech > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Grow_continue, use in assembly (cont.) > > On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:56:41 +0100 Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > The following series implements next part of resuming reshape from > checkpoint. > > In this series call to invoke reshape is included. > > It is required to have backup file to run reshape, so backup file > validation is added > > (without checking in file system) > > Array seams to be configured for reshape, monitor is blocked and > doesn't makes changes > > to process. On the end of reshape monitor unblock is placed also. > > > > In patch: > > Continue reshape after assembling array > > some plans for supporting container operations is placed. > > > > Reshape restoring is not working yet (a few more pathes are still > required) > > I hope some of therm I'll post tomorrow. > > > > BR > > Adam > > > > --- > > > > Adam Kwolek (7): > > FIX: array is frozen after reshape > > Continue reshape after assembling array > > FIX: Block monitor when starting array with reshape in progress > > Add block_subarray() > > FIX: configure disks slot for expansion > > FIX: reshape in md should wait for monitoring process (external > metadata) > > FIX: Verify Backup file name before reshape > > > > > > Assemble.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > --------- > > Grow.c | 15 ++++++++++++- > > Incremental.c | 1 + > > msg.c | 18 ++++++++++++---- > > msg.h | 2 ++ > > 5 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > > > I have applied the patches among these which make sense, and replied to > the > ones that really don't. > > If you think one of the patches that I rejected really is needed, please > provide specific detail of what you try to do, how it doesn't work, and > what > you think is the reason. > > All applied patches have been pushed to my devel-3.2 branch. > > Thanks, > NeilBrown Thanks, I'll review your comments. I think that patches: FIX: Continue reshape in the background FIX: array is frozen after reshape and reworked: FIX: Verify Backup file name before reshape for fork() in Grow_continue() will be needed for container operation support. BR Adam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
