Re: Something wrong with __prep_thunderdome in super-intel.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/25/2011 1:43 AM, Kwolek, Adam wrote:

Unfortunately this doesn't close issue.

I've reached the same from IMSM compatibility point of view, but have in mind that unit test suit 11 fails using this approach.
Put focus on test 5 in this suit (I'm using it, as this is the only one that fails for me) for IMSM (note that first test pass is for native metadata).
Using your path tests 5b and 5c fails. My code fails 5c test only. I'm currently working on it.

I am seeing a different failing set (after applying Anna's patches): 1, 1a, 2, 4, 5b, 5c...

One thing too look out for is that failed disks will no longer self identify. Prior to this mdadm would update the metadata on failed disks to show "failed", now the disk must be viewed in relation to others to determine if it is stale or not. This makes the mdadm -f case more in line with the hot removed case.

--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux