On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:24:12 +1100 NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote: > "read/write/compare checksum" is not a lot of words so I may well not be > understanding exactly what you mean, but I guess you are suggesting that we > could store (say) a 64bit hash of each 4K block somewhere. > e.g. Use 513 4K blocks to store 512 4K blocks of data with checksums. > When reading a block, read the checksum too and report an error if they > don't match. When writing the block, calculate and write the checksum too. > > This is already done by the disk drive - I'm not sure what you hope to gain > by doing it in the RAID layer as well. Consider RAID1/RAID10/RAID5/RAID6, where one or more members are returning bad data for some reason (e.g. are failing or have written garbage to disk during a sudden power loss). Having per-block checksums would allow to determine which members have correct data and which do not, and would help the RAID layer recover from that situation in the smartest way possible (with absolutely no loss or corruption of the user data). -- With respect, Roman
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
