Re: [PATCH 1/7] FIX: Verify Backup file name before reshape

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:56:50 +0100 Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> When reshape is continued backup_file is required for user data safety.
> Grow_continue() has to verify if any file name is passed in.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
>  Grow.c |    5 +++++
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Grow.c b/Grow.c
> index 47b8809..1470a91 100644
> --- a/Grow.c
> +++ b/Grow.c
> @@ -3332,6 +3332,11 @@ int Grow_continue(int mdfd, struct supertype *st, struct mdinfo *info,
>  	char *container = NULL;
>  	int err;
>  
> +	if (backup_file == NULL) {
> +		fprintf(stderr, Name ": Backup file name has to be specified "
> +			"for reshape continuation.\n");
> +		return 1;
> +	}
>  	if (!st->ss->external) {
>  		err = sysfs_set_str(info, NULL, "array_state", "readonly");
>  		if (err)


reshape_array already performs checks to ensure that backup_file is set when
needed - it isn't always needed.

Is there some reason those checks are not enough?

NeilBrown

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux