Fedora Development Discussion
Thread Index
[
Prev Page
][
Next Page
]
Re: livecds in the future
From
: Peter Jones
Re: livecds in the future
From
: John Reiser
Re: abrt + X Error => zillions of duplicate bug reports?
From
: Matěj Cepl
Re: [RFC] unified i386/x86_64 install media.
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: [RFC] unified i386/x86_64 install media.
From
: Chris Adams
Re: livecds in the future
From
: Peter Jones
Re: abrt + X Error => zillions of duplicate bug reports?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: livecds in the future
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: livecds in the future
From
: Chris Adams
Re: abrt + X Error => zillions of duplicate bug reports?
From
: Peter Jones
Re: livecds in the future
From
: Peter Jones
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Peter Jones
Re: livecds in the future
From
: Sir Gallantmon
Re: [RFC] unified i386/x86_64 install media.
From
: Sir Gallantmon
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Chris Ball
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: James Antill
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: [RFC] unified i386/x86_64 install media.
From
: Itamar Reis Peixoto
Re: [RFC] unified i386/x86_64 install media.
From
: Casey Dahlin
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Chris Ball
[RFC] unified i386/x86_64 install media.
From
: Dennis Gilmore
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Colin Walters
Re: abrt + X Error => zillions of duplicate bug reports?
From
: Yaakov Nemoy
Re: Fedora 12 x86 DVD images
From
: Andre Robatino
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Przemek Klosowski
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: Fedora 12 x86 DVD images
From
: Jesse Keating
PolicyKit and syslog -- now bug #541040
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: Fedora 12 x86 DVD images
From
: Andrea Musuruane
Re: Fedora 12 x86 DVD images
From
: Andre Robatino
Re: Fedora 12 x86 DVD images
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Fedora 12 x86 DVD images
From
: Andre Robatino
Re: Fedora 12 x86 DVD images
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Peter Jones
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Fedora 12 x86 DVD images
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: abrt + X Error => zillions of duplicate bug reports?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Fedora 12 x86 DVD images
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Fedora 12 x86 DVD images
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: tangent: PolicyKit and PAM
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Fedora 12 x86 DVD images
From
: Felix Miata
Re: F12 install stops at screen switch (language select)
From
: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
Re: F12 install stops at screen switch (language select)
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: tangent: PolicyKit and PAM
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Jan Klepek
Re: livecds in the future
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: F12 install stops at screen switch (language select)
From
: Chris Lumens
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: tangent: PolicyKit and PAM
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: F12 install stops at screen switch (language select)
From
: Jos Vos
Re: livecds in the future
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: livecds in the future
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Fedora 12 x86 DVD images
From
: Sir Gallantmon
Re: F12 install stops at screen switch (language select)
From
: Jos Vos
tangent: PolicyKit and PAM
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: F12 install stops at screen switch (language select)
From
: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
Re: PolicyKit and syslog
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: James Antill
Re: PolicyKit and syslog
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: PolicyKit and syslog
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: Bug triage: further change upcoming
From
: Adam Williamson
Hide the kittens and the babies, a message from your friendly KDE-SIG
From
: Steven M. Parrish
Re: Bug triage: further change upcoming
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: PolicyKit and syslog
From
: Seth Vidal
Bug triage: further change upcoming
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: PolicyKit and syslog
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: PolicyKit and syslog
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: PolicyKit and syslog
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Chris Adams
KDE-SIG weekly report (48/2009)
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: PolicyKit and syslog
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
PolicyKit and syslog
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: Fedora 12 x86 DVD images
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Fedora 12 x86 DVD images
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
F12 install stops at screen switch (language select)
From
: Jos Vos
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Roman Rakus
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Jussi Lehtola
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Jeremy Sanders
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Chris Adams
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Jochen Schmitt
Re: Kernel-2.6.31.6-134 seems to have a bug on R600 DRM
From
: Liang Suilong
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: James Antill
Re: livecds in the future
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: livecds in the future
From
: Simon Andrews
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Chris Adams
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
review swaps
From
: Adam Goode
heads-up: Oracle db-4.8.24 in rawhide
From
: Jindrich Novy
rawhide report: 20091124 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Felix Kaechele
Re: Kernel-2.6.31.6-134 seems to have a bug on R600 DRM
From
: Andreas Tunek
Fedora 12 x86 DVD images
From
: Andrea Musuruane
Candidate Questionnaire status (Was: Questions sent)
From
: Thorsten Leemhuis
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Panu Matilainen
RE: Kernel-2.6.31.6-134 seems to have a bug on R600 DRM
From
: Rodd Clarkson
Re: Notification of uploads to the lookaside cache
From
: Tom Lane
Re: Kernel-2.6.31.6-134 seems to have a bug on R600 DRM
From
: Rahul Sundaram
RE: Kernel-2.6.31.6-134 seems to have a bug on R600 DRM
From
: Otto Haliburton
Re: take me off list
From
: Ikem Krueger
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Eric Christensen
Re: Kernel-2.6.31.6-134 seems to have a bug on R600 DRM
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Gregory Maxwell
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Gregory Maxwell
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Notification of uploads to the lookaside cache
From
: Jon Masters
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Chris Adams
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Gregory Maxwell
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Kernel-2.6.31.6-134 seems to have a bug on R600 DRM
From
: Dave Airlie
Re: livecds in the future
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Gregory Maxwell
Re: livecds in the future
From
: John Reiser
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Kernel-2.6.31.6-134 seems to have a bug on R600 DRM
From
: Otto Haliburton
RE: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Otto Haliburton
Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Colin Walters
Re: livecds in the future
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: livecds in the future
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: livecds in the future
From
: Jesse Keating
Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: example content
From
: Ville-Pekka Vainio
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: James Morris
Re: livecds in the future
From
: Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Tom Lane
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Krzysztof Halasa
Re: livecds in the future
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Old/compat package naming
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Kernel-2.6.31.6-134 seems to have a bug on R600 DRM
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Kernel-2.6.31.6-134 seems to have a bug on R600 DRM
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: livecds in the future
From
: Rahul Sundaram
livecds in the future
From
: Ben Williams
Re: Who handles lidclose at login screen?
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Przemek Klosowski
Re: Who handles lidclose at login screen?
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: jack2
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Who handles lidclose at login screen?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Chris Adams
Re: example content
From
: Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Re: Who handles lidclose at login screen?
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: Who handles lidclose at login screen?
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Who handles lidclose at login screen?
From
: Bill Nottingham
No Frozen Rawhide Meeting Summary
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: example content
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: example content
From
: Sebastian Dziallas
Outage Notification - 2009-11-25 22:00 UTC
From
: Dennis Gilmore
Who handles lidclose at login screen?
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Andreas Bierfert
Re: example content
From
: Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Re: [RFA] Font audit results for Fedora 12 (final)
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
example content
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: [RFA] Font audit results for Fedora 12 and 2009-11-22 fedora-devel
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Peter Jones
Re: take me off list
From
: Itamar Reis Peixoto
take me off list
From
: Mark Jurack
Re: jack2
From
: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
Re: [RFA] Your gnu-free-fonts package did not pass QA
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: [RFA] Font audit results for Fedora 12 and 2009-11-22 fedora-devel
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: [RFA] Font audit results for Fedora 12 (final)
From
: Neal Becker
[RFA] Font package differences between Fedora 12 and 2009-11-22 Fedora devel
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
[RFA] Font test result differences between Fedora 12 and 2009-11-22 devel
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
[RFA] Font test result differences between Fedora 11 and Fedora 12
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
[RFA] Font package differences between Fedora 11 and Fedora 12
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: [RFA] Font audit results for Fedora 12 (final)
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
[RFA] Font audit results for Fedora 12 and 2009-11-22 fedora-devel
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Gregory Maxwell
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Felix Kaechele
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: rawhide report screwing up changelogs (was: Re: rawhide report: 20091123 changes)
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: [RFA] Your gnu-free-fonts package did not pass QA
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
From
: Jerry James
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: rawhide report screwing up changelogs (was: Re: rawhide report: 20091123 changes)
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: rawhide report screwing up changelogs (was: Re: rawhide report: 20091123 changes)
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: abrt + X Error => zillions of duplicate bug reports?
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: Right-click for wacom driver?
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2009-11-18 x86_64
From
: Matt Domsch
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Krzysztof Halasa
Re: rawhide report screwing up changelogs (was: Re: rawhide report: 20091123 changes)
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: rawhide report screwing up changelogs (was: Re: rawhide report: 20091123 changes)
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: rawhide report screwing up changelogs (was: Re: rawhide report: 20091123 changes)
From
: Michael Schwendt
rawhide report screwing up changelogs (was: Re: rawhide report: 20091123 changes)
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Otto Haliburton
rawhide report: 20091123 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Christoph Wickert
Package Review Stats for last 15 days ending 22nd Nov
From
: Rakesh Pandit
Re: Head-up - new firefox in rawhide
From
: Martin Stransky
upperlimit for considering a separate doc subpackage
From
: Rakesh Pandit
Re: Kernel-2.6.31.6-134 seems to have a bug on R600 DRM
From
: Andreas Tunek
Re: Head-up - new firefox in rawhide
From
: Martin Stransky
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: texlive 2009 - should set TEXMFCNF?
From
: Jindrich Novy
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Kernel-2.6.31.6-134 seems to have a bug on R600 DRM
From
: Liang Suilong
Re: abrt + X Error => zillions of duplicate bug reports?
From
: Karel Klic
Re: jack2
From
: Andy Shevchenko
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Right-click for wacom driver?
From
: Luya Tshimbalanga
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: Right-click for wacom driver?
From
: Peter Hutterer
Right-click for wacom driver?
From
: Luya Tshimbalanga
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: James Morris
Re: texlive 2009 - should set TEXMFCNF?
From
: Jonathan Underwood
Re: abrt + X Error => zillions of duplicate bug reports?
From
: drago01
Re: Notification of uploads to the lookaside cache
From
: Jon Stanley
Re: Notification of uploads to the lookaside cache
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: Notification of uploads to the lookaside cache
From
: Todd Zullinger
abrt + X Error => zillions of duplicate bug reports?
From
: Martin Sourada
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2009-11-18 x86_64
From
: Gianluca Sforna
Re: Head-up - new firefox in rawhide
From
: Ville-Pekka Vainio
Re: Notification of uploads to the lookaside cache
From
: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
rawhide report: 20091122 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2009-11-18 x86_64
From
: Paul Howarth
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2009-11-18 x86_64
From
: Paul Howarth
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: drago01
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: drago01
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2009-11-18 x86_64
From
: Gianluca Sforna
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Sir Gallantmon
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Jonathan Dieter
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Bill McGonigle
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Krzysztof Halasa
Re: Old/compat package naming
From
: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Notification of uploads to the lookaside cache
From
: Jon Stanley
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: nodata
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Gene Czarcinski
Re: jack2
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Thomas Sailer
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Casey Dahlin
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Tony Nelson
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: F12: where did window properties go?
From
: Gregory Maxwell
rawhide report: 20091121 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: drago01
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Caolán McNamara
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Christian Iseli
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: drago01
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Conrad Meyer
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: drago01
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Jonathan Dieter
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: James Morris
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Stephen John Smoogen
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: James Morris
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: James Morris
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: James Morris
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: James Morris
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Chris Adams
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Julian Sikorski
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Christian Iseli
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Colin Walters
Re: Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Improve the way rpm decides what is newer
From
: Christian Iseli
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Benny Amorsen
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Benny Amorsen
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Colin Walters
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Colin Walters
Re: Old/compat package naming
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: disallow broken push to updates?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: A silly question about our "FC" tag
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: A silly question about our "FC" tag
From
: Alex Lancaster
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Ikem Krueger
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: drago01
Re: Can't seem to make tag
From
: Alex Lancaster
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: No fuse module in Koji builds?
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: disallow broken push to updates?
From
: Alex Lancaster
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2009-11-18 x86_64
From
: Matt Domsch
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Gene Czarcinski
Re: A silly question about our "FC" tag
From
: Casey Dahlin
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2009-11-18 x86_64
From
: Robert Scheck
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Bill McGonigle
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Bill McGonigle
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Conrad Meyer
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Conrad Meyer
FESCo meeting summary for 2009-11-20
From
: Jon Stanley
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: brp-python-bytecompile
From
: David Malcolm
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Simo Sorce
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Tony Nelson
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Seth Vidal
rawhide report: 20091120 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Old/compat package naming
From
: Karsten Hopp
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Frank Ch. Eigler
brp-python-bytecompile
From
: Jerry James
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Owen Taylor
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: Old/compat package naming
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Orion Poplawski
Old/compat package naming
From
: Lubomir Rintel
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Robert Marcano
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Bill Nottingham
FYI: packageDB URL changes coming up
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: No fuse module in Koji builds?
From
: Dennis Gilmore
Re: allow adding repos in preupdate?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Question about tagging
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Fulko Hew
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Neal Becker
Re: F12: where did window properties go?
From
: Pádraig Brady
Re: A silly question about our "FC" tag
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Gregory Maxwell
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Simo Sorce
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Simon Andrews
Re: disallow broken push to updates?
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: disallow broken push to updates?
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Andrew Haley
disallow broken push to updates?
From
: Neal Becker
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Mike A. Harris
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Benny Amorsen
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Neal Becker
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: allow adding repos in preupdate?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Paul Howarth
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Roberto Ragusa
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Neal Becker
allow adding repos in preupdate?
From
: Neal Becker
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Tomasz Torcz
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
Re: abrt and bugzilla
From
: Neal Becker
Re: FC11 packages 'newer' than FC12
From
: Neal Becker
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Peter Robinson
abrt and bugzilla
From
: Matthew Booth
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Benny Amorsen
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Peter Robinson
libmpcdec vs. Musepack SV8
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: A silly question about our "FC" tag
From
: Mat Booth
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: Head-up - new firefox in rawhide
From
: Martin Stransky
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: James Morris
Re: Head-up - new firefox in rawhide
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Nicu Buculei
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Rudolf Kastl
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Rudolf Kastl
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Vote for the bug (was Re: Local users get to play root?)
From
: Mike A. Harris
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Adam Miller
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Conrad Meyer
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: James Morris
Re: A silly question about our "FC" tag
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: A silly question about our "FC" tag
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: Question about tagging
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: F12: where did window properties go?
From
: Bojan Smojver
Re: Vote for the bug (was Re: Local users get to play root?)
From
: Ankur Sinha
Re: A silly question about our "FC" tag
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: A silly question about our "FC" tag
From
: Stu Tomlinson
Re: Vote for the bug (was Re: Local users get to play root?)
From
: Justin
Re: Vote for the bug (was Re: Local users get to play root?)
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: A silly question about our "FC" tag
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Mail Lists
Re: Vote for the bug (was Re: Local users get to play root?)
From
: Justin
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: ilbsndfile update!
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: Vote for the bug (was Re: Local users get to play root?)
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Vote for the bug (was Re: Local users get to play root?)
From
: Jesse Keating
PackageKit policy: background and plans
From
: Owen Taylor
Re: Vote for the bug (was Re: Local users get to play root?)
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Review request...
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Head-up - new firefox in rawhide
From
: Braden McDaniel
Re: Vote for the bug (was Re: Local users get to play root?)
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: Vote for the bug (was Re: Local users get to play root?)
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: Vote for the bug (was Re: Local users get to play root?)
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Vote for the bug (was Re: Local users get to play root?)
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: F12: where did window properties go?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: draco
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Bojan Smojver
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Question about tagging
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Dave Airlie
Plan for tomorrow's (20091120) FESCo meeting
From
: Jon Stanley
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Paul W. Frields
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Bojan Smojver
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Eddie So is out of the office.
From
: Eddie . So
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Bojan Smojver
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: shmuel siegel
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Head-up - new firefox in rawhide
From
: Christopher Aillon
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Ralf Ertzinger
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Bojan Smojver
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Chris Adams
upgrade fedora's pyfribidi
From
: Muayyad AlSadi
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: FC11 packages 'newer' than FC12
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Casey Dahlin
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Chris Adams
Re: F12: where did window properties go?
From
: Adam Williamson
Vote for the bug (was Re: Local users get to play root?)
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Dave Jones
Re: Fedora 12 gold. Well, not so golden
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Bill McGonigle
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Leszek Matok
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Casey Dahlin
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Bojan Smojver
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: drago01
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Casey Dahlin
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Peter Jones
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Casey Dahlin
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Casey Dahlin
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Bojan Smojver
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Bojan Smojver
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Peter Jones
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Dave Airlie
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: ilbsndfile update!
From
: Jeffrey Ollie
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Krzysztof Halasa
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Peter Jones
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Colin Walters
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: drago01
Re: Issue with F13 dracut/kernel/selinux
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Jonathan Underwood
Re: FC11 packages 'newer' than FC12
From
: James Antill
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Tony Nelson
Re: Need help with a FTBFS bug for NQC
From
: Rick L. Vinyard, Jr.
Re: audio group after upgrade
From
: Tomasz Torcz
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: nodata
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Ikem Krueger
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Gregory Maxwell
audio group after upgrade
From
: Christoph Höger
Re: Need help with a FTBFS bug for NQC
From
: Mat Booth
Re: FC11 packages 'newer' than FC12
From
: Stu Tomlinson
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Martyn Foster
Re: Local users get to play root?
From
: Keith G. Robertson-Turner
Re: FC11 packages 'newer' than FC12
From
: James Antill
Re: FC11 packages 'newer' than FC12
From
: Przemek Klosowski
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: FC11 packages 'newer' than FC12
From
: Jeff MacDonald
Need help with a FTBFS bug for NQC
From
: Rick L. Vinyard, Jr.
FC11 packages 'newer' than FC12
From
: Przemek Klosowski
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Justin M. Forbes
Re: Head-up - new firefox in rawhide
From
: Conrad Meyer
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Simo Sorce
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Security policy oversight needed?
From
: Gregory Maxwell
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
