On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 18:03 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Remember that you need to consider %epoch in any explicitly version > Requires/BuildRequires/Obsoletes/Conflicts, too. > > Requires: foo > 2.10 > > would become what to get accurate? And considering upstream's versioning > scheme flaw where 2.3 followed 2.20. Once you add a kind of Epoch to > that dependency, you don't want it to update often, as every bump of > an Epoch-like value can invalidate a versioned dependency. Nasty. good point. in other words, as we've been saying all along, this kind of change is just going to cause lots of pain for a gain that could more properly be made otherwise, so let's not do it. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
